Skip to main content

calculus and analysis - Pulling constants out of integrations




The following is the code and output of a Mathematica command


How do I get Mathematica to remove $g(y)$ outside the integral?



Answer



This is some code I adapted from a package I wrote to manipulate Sums, instead of integrals. But it should work in bringing out expression that do not depend on the integration variable too. After all, integrals are sums pushed to the limit. EDIT: cleaned up code, there is no need to separate rules here.



outrules = {
Integrate[f_ + g_, it:{x_Symbol, __}] :> Integrate[f, it] + Integrate[g, it],
Integrate[c_ f_, it:{x_Symbol, __}] :> c Integrate[f, it] /; FreeQ[c, x],
Integrate[c_, it:{x_Symbol, __}] :> c Integrate[1, it] /; FreeQ[c, x]
};


(You could apply the rules directly as in expr //. outrules, but I like to define an ordinary procedure like BringOut - or PullOut if you prefer)



BringOut[s_] := s //. outrules

It works in your simple example


g[y] Integrate[f[x1, y]/g[y], {x1, 0, x}] // BringOut

(* Integrate[f[x1, y], {x1, 0, x}] *)


and it also works with more complex integrands (basically, it exploits the linear property of the integral)


Integrate[y(f[x1, y]/(1 + g[y]) - h[y]), {x1, 0, x}] // BringOut

(* y (Integrate[f[x1, y], {x1,0,x}]/(1 + g[y]) - x h[y]) *)

Sometimes you might want to wrap and Expand, or an Apart or some other expression manipulation procedure to the integrand. Since the action usually depends on the expression, I found no use into incorporating this into BringOut. It's cleaner to apply the desired simplification where you need it and only when you need it, usually after BringOut has done its work:


BringOut[Integrate[y(f[x1, y]/(1 + g[y]) - h[y]), {x1, 0, x}]] // Factor

(* (Integrate[f[x1, y], {x1,0,x}] - x h[y] + x g[y] h[y]) y / (1 + g[y]) *)


Caveat emptor: the original code worked on a user defined and unevaluated version of Sum, and I have not tested it thoroughly with a built-in procedure like Integrate. But I do not see why it shouldn't work.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.