Skip to main content

list manipulation - Adding points limits


With 4 points I set a path where your total length was subdivided into 300 points


Clear["Global`*"]  
points={{0,0},{5,8.07774721},{10,4.24499363},{20,9.28880172}}  
Needs["GraphUtilities`"]  

n=300;  
pts=LineScaledCoordinate[points,N@(#/n)]&/@Range[0,n];


However with this code were not included in the list points. Then with the function below I've added.


pts=Insert[pts,points[[2]],107];  
pts=Insert[pts,points[[3]],177];

I added these points in the correct position because I searched by hand and applied the function.
This is the first question:
How do you find these positions in an automatic way?


With that done, with these new items i created divisions where these points are at the end of each list.
How could I do that these points are reference for these divisions?



list1=pts[[#,1]]&/@Range[107];  
list2=pts[[#,1]]&/@Range[108,177];  
list3=pts[[#,1]]&/@Range[178,303];

Answer



This is a answer based on the solution of Michael E2.


I would like to offer my attempts without damaging the response that does not belong to me.


My attempts


Here is the list pts without the values from the list points


Clear["Global`*"]
points = {{0, 0}, {5, 8.07774721}, {10, 4.24499363}, {20, 9.28880172}};

Needs["GraphUtilities`"]

n = 300;
pts = LineScaledCoordinate[points, N@(#/n)] & /@ Range[0, n];

With the function below it is possible to structure the points from the list points in pairs with offset value 1.


Partition[points, 2, 1]


$\left( \begin{array}{cc} \{0,0\} & \{5,8.07775\} \\ \{5,8.07775\} & \{10,4.24499\} \\ \{10,4.24499\} & \{20,9.2888\} \\ \end{array} \right)$




With the function below it is possible to get the lengths between the pairs mentioned above


partialPath = EuclideanDistance @@@ Partition[points, 2, 1] // N

enter image description here



$\{9.5,6.3,11.2\}$



With the function below it is possible to make the accumulated form sum


Accumulate[partialPath]



$\{9.5,15.8,27.\}$



With the function below it is possible to delete the last element of the accumulated numbers list


Most@Accumulate[partialPath]


$\{9.5,15.8\}$




With the function below it is possible to use the last element of the accumulated numbers list


Last@Accumulate[partialPath]


$27$



With the function below it is possible to get the percentage of each path with the full path


porcentPath = {#/Last@Accumulate[partialPath]} & /@Most@Accumulate[partialPath]

enter image description here




$\left( \begin{array}{c} 0.351852 \\ 0.585185 \\ \end{array} \right)$



With the function below, it is possible to separate the points in the points list that are not included in the pts list


valuesPositions = Rest@Most@points

enter image description here



$\left( \begin{array}{cc} 5 & 8.07775 \\ 10 & 4.24499 \\ \end{array} \right)$




With the function below it is possible to identify which positions in should be inserted the values {5,8.07774721} and {10,4.24499363}


pos = Flatten@Transpose[Ceiling[n*porcentPath] + 1]

enter image description here



$\{107,177\}$



With the function below it is possible to define a list to be added values, the values to be added and the positions they should be inserted.


InsertValuePosition[list_, values_, positions_] := 
 Fold[Insert[#, #2[[1]], #2[[2]]] &, list, Transpose[{values, positions}]]

pts = InsertValuePosition[pts, valuesPositions, Transpose[{pos}]]

With the function below it is possible to subdivide the pts list in three other lists where the entered values are at the end of the two first lists


FoldPairList[TakeDrop, pts, Flatten@{0, pos, Length@pts} // Differences]

enter image description here


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.
Post a Comment
Read more