Skip to main content

programming - How can I overload a function with multiple bracket-slots so f[a][b] and f[a] can coexist?


Maybe this is not even possible:


I want to create a function f that can have two input brackets like:


f[a_][b_:1]:= a*b

and alternatively just one input bracket:


f[a_]:= a

But with overloading the definitions the second definition interferes with the first definition, because the pattern f[a_] is replaced in a expression like:



In:


f[2][3]

Out:


2[3]

with the result of f[2] (in this case)


Of course, I could use just one bracket slot like f[a_,b_:1], instead of f[a_][b_:1], but thats not the point.


So i am asking for an optional bracket slot. Is that possible?


(BTW, I dont know the correct name of the []-Pattern, and called it bracket slot)




Answer



In the Standard Evaluation Sequence the heads of expressions are evaluated first:




  1. If the expression is a raw object (e.g., Integer, String, etc.), leave it unchanged.




  2. Evaluate the head h of the expression.





  3. Evaluate each element of the expression in turn ...




Therefore since f[1] is the head of f[1][2] it will evaluate if it has a definition that matches. This is unavoidable in standard evaluation. To get around this requires Stack trickery that Leonid illustrated here. It works on the principle that f is the head of f[1] itself and is therefore evaluated first of all.


Here is a meta-function to automate his method:


SetAttributes[deepDefine, HoldAll]

deepDefine[s_Symbol, LHS_, RHS_] :=
s :=
With[{stack = Stack[_]},

With[{fcallArgs = Cases[stack, HoldForm[LHS] :> RHS]},
(First@fcallArgs &) & /; fcallArgs =!= {}
]
]

We now apply it like this:


ClearAll[f]

deepDefine[f, f[a_][b_: 1], a*b]


f[a_] := a

Test:


f[x]
f[x][y]
f[z][]


x


x y

z

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.