Skip to main content

programming - How can I overload a function with multiple bracket-slots so f[a][b] and f[a] can coexist?


Maybe this is not even possible:


I want to create a function f that can have two input brackets like:


f[a_][b_:1]:= a*b

and alternatively just one input bracket:


f[a_]:= a

But with overloading the definitions the second definition interferes with the first definition, because the pattern f[a_] is replaced in a expression like:



In:


f[2][3]

Out:


2[3]

with the result of f[2] (in this case)


Of course, I could use just one bracket slot like f[a_,b_:1], instead of f[a_][b_:1], but thats not the point.


So i am asking for an optional bracket slot. Is that possible?


(BTW, I dont know the correct name of the []-Pattern, and called it bracket slot)




Answer



In the Standard Evaluation Sequence the heads of expressions are evaluated first:




  1. If the expression is a raw object (e.g., Integer, String, etc.), leave it unchanged.




  2. Evaluate the head h of the expression.





  3. Evaluate each element of the expression in turn ...




Therefore since f[1] is the head of f[1][2] it will evaluate if it has a definition that matches. This is unavoidable in standard evaluation. To get around this requires Stack trickery that Leonid illustrated here. It works on the principle that f is the head of f[1] itself and is therefore evaluated first of all.


Here is a meta-function to automate his method:


SetAttributes[deepDefine, HoldAll]

deepDefine[s_Symbol, LHS_, RHS_] :=
s :=
With[{stack = Stack[_]},

With[{fcallArgs = Cases[stack, HoldForm[LHS] :> RHS]},
(First@fcallArgs &) & /; fcallArgs =!= {}
]
]

We now apply it like this:


ClearAll[f]

deepDefine[f, f[a_][b_: 1], a*b]


f[a_] := a

Test:


f[x]
f[x][y]
f[z][]


x


x y

z

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...