Skip to main content

plotting - How to plot periodic function's graphic?


How to plot periodic function's graphic?



For example, $f(t) = t$ when $-5

f[t] := If[-5 <= t <= 5, t, f[t + 10] = f[t]];
Plot[f[t], {t, -20, 20}]

Output



Answer



What about this?


This defines a rather general function myperiodicthat translate a normal function to periodic form, the second parameter {val, min, max} specify a periodic interval of your desired periodic function:


myperiodic[func_, {val_Symbol, min_?NumericQ, max_?NumericQ}] :=
func /. (val :> Mod[val - min, max - min] + min)


Then you can use it to plot things:


Plot[myperiodic[t, {t, -5, 5}] // Evaluate, {t, -40, 40}]

enter image description here


Plot[myperiodic[t^2, {t, -3, 5}] // Evaluate, {t, -40, 40}]

enter image description here






We can extend this function in a couple of possibly useful ways. It may be noted that if t has a global value the plots above will fail, because Evaluate breaks the scoping of Plot. This could be remedied by using the Evaluated option but it would be nice not to need either. We can achieve that by holding arguments unevaluated using HoldAll and then holding at least the Symbol and expression unevaluated while making the substitution. These methods come to mind:



  • Adding Unevaluated and HoldPattern to the existing replacement

  • leveraging the attributes of Pattern and RuleDelayed in an inverted rule form (injector pattern)

  • Using Function which holds parameter name and body

  • An undocumented syntax for With (:=) that does not evaluate substitution expressions


In code:


SetAttributes[{periodic1, periodic2, periodic3, periodic4}, HoldAll]


periodic1[expr_, {s_Symbol, min_?NumericQ, max_?NumericQ}] :=
Unevaluated[expr] /. HoldPattern[s] :> Mod[s, max - min, min]

Quiet[
periodic2[expr_, {s_Symbol, min_?NumericQ, max_?NumericQ}] :=
Mod[s, max - min, min] /. s_ :> expr
]

periodic3[expr_, {s_Symbol, min_?NumericQ, max_?NumericQ}] :=
Function[s, expr][Mod[s, max - min, min]]


periodic4[expr_, {s_Symbol, min_?NumericQ, max_?NumericQ}] :=
With[{s := Mod[s, max - min, min]}, expr]

Testing indicates that the last method is the fastest:


First @ AbsoluteTiming @ Do[#[7 + t^2, {t, -5, 5}], {t, -40, 40, 0.001}] & /@
{periodic1, periodic2, periodic3, periodic4}


{0.35492, 0.382667, 0.237522, 0.235105}


Demonstration of use:


Plot[periodic4[7 + t^2, {t, -5, 5}], {t, -40, 40}, Frame -> True]

enter image description here


The next extension that can be valuable it to have periodic return a function rather than a bare expression. While the functions above evaluate correctly internally in the presence of a global assignment to the declared Symbol the result evaluates with that global value and therefore cannot be reused. Returning a function allows us to use it more generally such as mapping over a list of values, which can have advantage as I will show.


Proposal


SetAttributes[periodic, HoldAll]

periodic[expr_, {s_Symbol, min_?NumericQ, max_?NumericQ}] :=

Join[s &, With[{s := Mod[s, max - min, min]}, expr &]]

(Note that Join works on any head. Function acts to hold the parts of the final Function before it is assembled.)


Now:


periodic[7 + t^2, {t, -5, 5}]


Function[t, 7 + Mod[t, 5 - -5, -5]^2]

Plot[periodic[7 + t^2, {t, -5, 5}][x], {x, -40, 40}, Frame -> True]


enter image description here


(Note that x was used above for clarity but using t would not conflict.)


If the somewhat awkward from of Function returned is a concern know that it will be optimized by Compile, either manually or automatically:


Compile @@ periodic[7 + t^2, {t, -5, 5}]


CompiledFunction[{t}, 7 + (Mod[t + 5, 10] - 5)^2, -CompiledCode-]

The function-generating form does not perform quite as well (as e.g. periodic4) when used naively:



Table[periodic[7 + t^2, {t, -5, 5}][t], {t, -40, 40, 0.001}] // AbsoluteTiming // First


0.3600206

However it allows for superior performance if applied optimally, using Map, which auto-compiles:


periodic[7 + t^2, {t, -5, 5}] /@ Range[-40, 40, 0.001] // AbsoluteTiming // First


0.0130007


As a final touch we can give our function proper syntax highlighting:


SyntaxInformation[periodic] =
{"LocalVariables" -> {"Table", {2}}, "ArgumentsPattern" -> {_, {_, _, _}}};

enter image description here


Mr.Wizard


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....