Skip to main content

plotting - How to plot periodic function's graphic?


How to plot periodic function's graphic?



For example, $f(t) = t$ when $-5

f[t] := If[-5 <= t <= 5, t, f[t + 10] = f[t]];
Plot[f[t], {t, -20, 20}]

Output



Answer



What about this?


This defines a rather general function myperiodicthat translate a normal function to periodic form, the second parameter {val, min, max} specify a periodic interval of your desired periodic function:


myperiodic[func_, {val_Symbol, min_?NumericQ, max_?NumericQ}] :=
func /. (val :> Mod[val - min, max - min] + min)


Then you can use it to plot things:


Plot[myperiodic[t, {t, -5, 5}] // Evaluate, {t, -40, 40}]

enter image description here


Plot[myperiodic[t^2, {t, -3, 5}] // Evaluate, {t, -40, 40}]

enter image description here






We can extend this function in a couple of possibly useful ways. It may be noted that if t has a global value the plots above will fail, because Evaluate breaks the scoping of Plot. This could be remedied by using the Evaluated option but it would be nice not to need either. We can achieve that by holding arguments unevaluated using HoldAll and then holding at least the Symbol and expression unevaluated while making the substitution. These methods come to mind:



  • Adding Unevaluated and HoldPattern to the existing replacement

  • leveraging the attributes of Pattern and RuleDelayed in an inverted rule form (injector pattern)

  • Using Function which holds parameter name and body

  • An undocumented syntax for With (:=) that does not evaluate substitution expressions


In code:


SetAttributes[{periodic1, periodic2, periodic3, periodic4}, HoldAll]


periodic1[expr_, {s_Symbol, min_?NumericQ, max_?NumericQ}] :=
Unevaluated[expr] /. HoldPattern[s] :> Mod[s, max - min, min]

Quiet[
periodic2[expr_, {s_Symbol, min_?NumericQ, max_?NumericQ}] :=
Mod[s, max - min, min] /. s_ :> expr
]

periodic3[expr_, {s_Symbol, min_?NumericQ, max_?NumericQ}] :=
Function[s, expr][Mod[s, max - min, min]]


periodic4[expr_, {s_Symbol, min_?NumericQ, max_?NumericQ}] :=
With[{s := Mod[s, max - min, min]}, expr]

Testing indicates that the last method is the fastest:


First @ AbsoluteTiming @ Do[#[7 + t^2, {t, -5, 5}], {t, -40, 40, 0.001}] & /@
{periodic1, periodic2, periodic3, periodic4}


{0.35492, 0.382667, 0.237522, 0.235105}


Demonstration of use:


Plot[periodic4[7 + t^2, {t, -5, 5}], {t, -40, 40}, Frame -> True]

enter image description here


The next extension that can be valuable it to have periodic return a function rather than a bare expression. While the functions above evaluate correctly internally in the presence of a global assignment to the declared Symbol the result evaluates with that global value and therefore cannot be reused. Returning a function allows us to use it more generally such as mapping over a list of values, which can have advantage as I will show.


Proposal


SetAttributes[periodic, HoldAll]

periodic[expr_, {s_Symbol, min_?NumericQ, max_?NumericQ}] :=

Join[s &, With[{s := Mod[s, max - min, min]}, expr &]]

(Note that Join works on any head. Function acts to hold the parts of the final Function before it is assembled.)


Now:


periodic[7 + t^2, {t, -5, 5}]


Function[t, 7 + Mod[t, 5 - -5, -5]^2]

Plot[periodic[7 + t^2, {t, -5, 5}][x], {x, -40, 40}, Frame -> True]


enter image description here


(Note that x was used above for clarity but using t would not conflict.)


If the somewhat awkward from of Function returned is a concern know that it will be optimized by Compile, either manually or automatically:


Compile @@ periodic[7 + t^2, {t, -5, 5}]


CompiledFunction[{t}, 7 + (Mod[t + 5, 10] - 5)^2, -CompiledCode-]

The function-generating form does not perform quite as well (as e.g. periodic4) when used naively:



Table[periodic[7 + t^2, {t, -5, 5}][t], {t, -40, 40, 0.001}] // AbsoluteTiming // First


0.3600206

However it allows for superior performance if applied optimally, using Map, which auto-compiles:


periodic[7 + t^2, {t, -5, 5}] /@ Range[-40, 40, 0.001] // AbsoluteTiming // First


0.0130007


As a final touch we can give our function proper syntax highlighting:


SyntaxInformation[periodic] =
{"LocalVariables" -> {"Table", {2}}, "ArgumentsPattern" -> {_, {_, _, _}}};

enter image description here


Mr.Wizard


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

front end - keyboard shortcut to invoke Insert new matrix

I frequently need to type in some matrices, and the menu command Insert > Table/Matrix > New... allows matrices with lines drawn between columns and rows, which is very helpful. I would like to make a keyboard shortcut for it, but cannot find the relevant frontend token command (4209405) for it. Since the FullForm[] and InputForm[] of matrices with lines drawn between rows and columns is the same as those without lines, it's hard to do this via 3rd party system-wide text expanders (e.g. autohotkey or atext on mac). How does one assign a keyboard shortcut for the menu item Insert > Table/Matrix > New... , preferably using only mathematica? Thanks! Answer In the MenuSetup.tr (for linux located in the $InstallationDirectory/SystemFiles/FrontEnd/TextResources/X/ directory), I changed the line MenuItem["&New...", "CreateGridBoxDialog"] to read MenuItem["&New...", "CreateGridBoxDialog", MenuKey["m", Modifiers-...

How to thread a list

I have data in format data = {{a1, a2}, {b1, b2}, {c1, c2}, {d1, d2}} Tableform: I want to thread it to : tdata = {{{a1, b1}, {a2, b2}}, {{a1, c1}, {a2, c2}}, {{a1, d1}, {a2, d2}}} Tableform: And I would like to do better then pseudofunction[n_] := Transpose[{data2[[1]], data2[[n]]}]; SetAttributes[pseudofunction, Listable]; Range[2, 4] // pseudofunction Here is my benchmark data, where data3 is normal sample of real data. data3 = Drop[ExcelWorkBook[[Column1 ;; Column4]], None, 1]; data2 = {a #, b #, c #, d #} & /@ Range[1, 10^5]; data = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {10^6, 4}]; Here is my benchmark code kptnw[list_] := Transpose[{Table[First@#, {Length@# - 1}], Rest@#}, {3, 1, 2}] &@list kptnw2[list_] := Transpose[{ConstantArray[First@#, Length@# - 1], Rest@#}, {3, 1, 2}] &@list OleksandrR[list_] := Flatten[Outer[List, List@First[list], Rest[list], 1], {{2}, {1, 4}}] paradox2[list_] := Partition[Riffle[list[[1]], #], 2] & /@ Drop[list, 1] RM[list_] := FoldList[Transpose[{First@li...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...