Skip to main content

mathematical optimization - Find the maximum Z in {(X + Y)==Z} using all the digits 0-9 only once


II want to add two integers with different digits to get a third integer with different digits. At the end, all 10 digits have to be different. So there should be 10 digits in total. How you distribute them is your (or Mathematica's) decision.


Lets say these numbers are $X$, $Y$ and $Z$, so that $X + Y = Z$. There is no rule how many digits a number should have. For example $X$ can have two digits or it can have three digits. What is the maximum possible value for $Z$?


How can I tell Mathematica to chose such two numbers in order to get a third one which satisfies the conditions I impose above? Please explain your answer in simple terms. I am a beginner, and I want to understand the code in the answer so I could do it on my own at some later time.



Answer



Brute forcing it: (The edit at the end is a much faster alternative)



n = 9;
IntegerPartitions[n + 1, {3}]
(* {{8, 1, 1}, {7, 2, 1}, {6, 3, 1}, {6, 2, 2}, {5, 4, 1},
{5, 3, 2}, {4, 4, 2}, {4, 3, 3}}*)

are the ways to split ten digits.
The numbers on the first row can't produce viable sums, so we need to check only the partitions on the bottom row.
Then:


k = {{5, 3, 2}, {4, 4, 2}, {4, 3, 3}};


and we run (due to memory constraints) the following for each k (x = 1 ...3) (you may use Map instead of Outer)


nums = Union @@ 
Outer[((If[#[[1]] == #[[2]] + #[[3]], #, ## &[]]) &@(FromDigits /@
Internal`PartitionRagged[##])) &, Permutations[Range[0, n]],
k[[x ;; x]], 1];

The first k returns no results and the other two return a bunch.


The larger Z returned is 6021 made by:


{{6021, 5934, 87}, {6021, 5937, 84}, {6021, 5943, 78}, {6021, 5948, 73}, 
{6021, 5973, 48}, {6021, 5978, 43}, {6021, 5984, 37}, {6021, 5987, 34}}




Edit, much faster and less memory usage: (uses this FromDigits syntax )


n = 9;
k = IntegerPartitions[n + 1, {3}];
pn = Permutations[Range[0, n]];
res = {};
Monitor[For[i = 6, i <= Length@k, i++,
aa = Internal`PartitionRagged[Transpose@pn, k[[i]]];
bb = FromDigits /@

(If[Length@#< 3, Prepend[#, r@@ConstantArray[0, {3-Length@#, (n + 1)!}]], #]/.
r -> Sequence & /@ aa);
AppendTo[ res, (If[#[[1]] == #[[2]] + #[[3]], -#, ## &[]] & /@ Transpose@bb)]];
(* Memory recovery *)
aa =.; bb =.; Share[];, i]
final = Flatten[-Union[Sort /@ res], 1]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

list manipulation - Selecting multiple columns from a matrix?

Sample data: data = { {{2013, 1, 1}, 24.13, 167.67, 231.82}, {{2013, 1, 2}, 32.15, 170.92, 225.99}, {{2013, 1, 3}, 35.43, 172.68, 221.67}, {{2013, 1, 4}, 36.73, 173.05, 218.32}, {{2013, 1, 5}, 58.19, 165.96, 197.05}, {{2013, 1, 6}, 69.99, 163.50, 187.52}, {{2013, 1, 7}, 71.37, 154.21, 175.58}, {{2013, 1, 8}, 72.51, 149.66, 163.25}}; I want a DateListPlot with three graphs, so for a matrix formed by columns 1 and 2, one for columns 1 and 3, and 1 for columns 1 and 4. At the moment I'm using this code: data2 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 2]]}]; data3 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 3]]}]; data4 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 4]]}]; DateListPlot[{data2, data3, data4}, Joined -> True, Filling -> {3 -> {1}}] but I have a hunch that this can be done more efficiently. I don't like the Transpose s in particular. Any ideas? edit (for extra credit) What if I need to multiply the second column by 2, which in my solution is simp...

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...