Skip to main content

programming - Threading a compiled function over multiple arguments of different lengths


I am interested in threading a compiled function over multiple argument lists of different lengths.


I will explain this in two steps:


Suppose f is some function. Then one can define another function,


ppost[arg_, context_] := Apply[f[arg, ##] &, context]

which can be used as


In[2]:= ppost[a, {b, c}]

Out[2]= f[a, b, c]


or in a more complex scenario let,


In[3]:= argList = {{a1, b1}, {a2, b2, c2}};

In[4]:= mList = {{m1, n1}, {m2, n2, o2}};

In[5]:= contextList = {mList, y, z}

Out[5]= {{{m1, n1}, {m2, n2, o2}}, y, z}


We can thread the function over the argList and the contextList as follows:


In[6]:= Thread[ppost[argList, contextList]]

Out[6]= {f[{a1, b1}, {m1, n1}, y, z],
f[{a2, b2, c2}, {m2, n2, o2}, y, z]}

The above works, as needed.


Question: I need to do the same when f is a compiled function. As an example,


fc = Compile[{{arg, _Real, 1}, {c1, _Real, 1}, {c2, _Real}, {c3, _Real}},
c3*arg + c2*c1

]

ppost1[arg_, context_] := Apply[fc[arg, ##] &, context]

In[9]:= nargList = {{1, 2}, {3, 4, 5}} // N;

In[10]:= nmList = {{6, 7}, {8, 9, 10}} // N;

In[11]:= ncontextList = {nmList, 50, 55} // N


Out[11]= {{{6., 7.}, {8., 9., 10.}}, 50., 55.}

In[12]:= ppost1[nargList[[1]], {nmList[[1]], 50, 55}]

Out[12]= {355., 460.}

So far, so good, but then the following does not work properly, and uses the uncompiled version.


In[14]:= Thread[ppost1[nargList, ncontextList]]

During evaluation of

In[14]:= CompiledFunction::cfta: Argument {{1.,2.},{3.,4.,5.}} at position 1
should be a rank 1 tensor of machine-size real numbers. >>

During evaluation of
In[14]:= Thread::tdlen: Objects of unequal length in
{{355.,460.},{565.,670.,775.}} cannot be combined. >>`

Out[14]= {{355., 460.}, {565., 670., 775.}}

So, how can I thread the compiled function over the arguments nargList, ncontextList?




Answer



I think your problem is equivalent to trying to get something like this


l := Power[2, 2]

f /@ l

return f[2]^f[2] instead of 4


You can control argument evaluation in MMA, for it to be either evaluated or not evaluated, but not half evaluated. If you wanted that you would have to either redesign your variables, or use things like replacement rules of OwnValues/DownValuess


In your case, you are expecting ppost1 to evaluate to fc, but fc not try to evaluate its arguments (until Thread had a chance to act)


If someone understood better than I did what your goal is, perhaps he can help you do it in some way



EDIT


Perhaps what you're looking for then can be achieved by masking the compiled function with a function that knows how to stay symbolically unevaluated


With[{cmp = 
Compile[{{arg, _Real, 1}, {c1, _Real,
1}, {c2, _Real}, {c3, _Real}}, c3*arg + c2*c1]},
fc[arg : {___Real}, c1 : {___Real}, c2_Real, c3_Real] :=
cmp[arg, c1, c2, c3]
]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

list manipulation - Selecting multiple columns from a matrix?

Sample data: data = { {{2013, 1, 1}, 24.13, 167.67, 231.82}, {{2013, 1, 2}, 32.15, 170.92, 225.99}, {{2013, 1, 3}, 35.43, 172.68, 221.67}, {{2013, 1, 4}, 36.73, 173.05, 218.32}, {{2013, 1, 5}, 58.19, 165.96, 197.05}, {{2013, 1, 6}, 69.99, 163.50, 187.52}, {{2013, 1, 7}, 71.37, 154.21, 175.58}, {{2013, 1, 8}, 72.51, 149.66, 163.25}}; I want a DateListPlot with three graphs, so for a matrix formed by columns 1 and 2, one for columns 1 and 3, and 1 for columns 1 and 4. At the moment I'm using this code: data2 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 2]]}]; data3 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 3]]}]; data4 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 4]]}]; DateListPlot[{data2, data3, data4}, Joined -> True, Filling -> {3 -> {1}}] but I have a hunch that this can be done more efficiently. I don't like the Transpose s in particular. Any ideas? edit (for extra credit) What if I need to multiply the second column by 2, which in my solution is simp...