Skip to main content

programming - Threading a compiled function over multiple arguments of different lengths


I am interested in threading a compiled function over multiple argument lists of different lengths.


I will explain this in two steps:


Suppose f is some function. Then one can define another function,


ppost[arg_, context_] := Apply[f[arg, ##] &, context]

which can be used as


In[2]:= ppost[a, {b, c}]

Out[2]= f[a, b, c]


or in a more complex scenario let,


In[3]:= argList = {{a1, b1}, {a2, b2, c2}};

In[4]:= mList = {{m1, n1}, {m2, n2, o2}};

In[5]:= contextList = {mList, y, z}

Out[5]= {{{m1, n1}, {m2, n2, o2}}, y, z}


We can thread the function over the argList and the contextList as follows:


In[6]:= Thread[ppost[argList, contextList]]

Out[6]= {f[{a1, b1}, {m1, n1}, y, z],
f[{a2, b2, c2}, {m2, n2, o2}, y, z]}

The above works, as needed.


Question: I need to do the same when f is a compiled function. As an example,


fc = Compile[{{arg, _Real, 1}, {c1, _Real, 1}, {c2, _Real}, {c3, _Real}},
c3*arg + c2*c1

]

ppost1[arg_, context_] := Apply[fc[arg, ##] &, context]

In[9]:= nargList = {{1, 2}, {3, 4, 5}} // N;

In[10]:= nmList = {{6, 7}, {8, 9, 10}} // N;

In[11]:= ncontextList = {nmList, 50, 55} // N


Out[11]= {{{6., 7.}, {8., 9., 10.}}, 50., 55.}

In[12]:= ppost1[nargList[[1]], {nmList[[1]], 50, 55}]

Out[12]= {355., 460.}

So far, so good, but then the following does not work properly, and uses the uncompiled version.


In[14]:= Thread[ppost1[nargList, ncontextList]]

During evaluation of

In[14]:= CompiledFunction::cfta: Argument {{1.,2.},{3.,4.,5.}} at position 1
should be a rank 1 tensor of machine-size real numbers. >>

During evaluation of
In[14]:= Thread::tdlen: Objects of unequal length in
{{355.,460.},{565.,670.,775.}} cannot be combined. >>`

Out[14]= {{355., 460.}, {565., 670., 775.}}

So, how can I thread the compiled function over the arguments nargList, ncontextList?




Answer



I think your problem is equivalent to trying to get something like this


l := Power[2, 2]

f /@ l

return f[2]^f[2] instead of 4


You can control argument evaluation in MMA, for it to be either evaluated or not evaluated, but not half evaluated. If you wanted that you would have to either redesign your variables, or use things like replacement rules of OwnValues/DownValuess


In your case, you are expecting ppost1 to evaluate to fc, but fc not try to evaluate its arguments (until Thread had a chance to act)


If someone understood better than I did what your goal is, perhaps he can help you do it in some way



EDIT


Perhaps what you're looking for then can be achieved by masking the compiled function with a function that knows how to stay symbolically unevaluated


With[{cmp = 
Compile[{{arg, _Real, 1}, {c1, _Real,
1}, {c2, _Real}, {c3, _Real}}, c3*arg + c2*c1]},
fc[arg : {___Real}, c1 : {___Real}, c2_Real, c3_Real] :=
cmp[arg, c1, c2, c3]
]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....