Skip to main content

plotting - Problem regarding 3D plot of a Möbius strip from a set of 2D points


First time posting here, although an experienced user of WM. I have a problem regarding graphics which I cannot seem to fix, so I am asking for your help.



  1. I start with a set of points $(x,y)$ in the range of $[0,1]\times[0,1]$, so a 2D rectangle. With these points I generate a triangle mesh which I later use with Finite Element Method for solving the eigenmodes of this rectangle OR a coat of cylinder, torus, or Möbius, depending on what kind of boundary conditions I use in FEM.

  2. If the membrane is a coat of a 3D object, like in this case for a moebius strip, I want to draw the surface of a Möbius strip as a set of points $(x',y',z')$ in 3D. Normally I do this using parametrisation equations. I have found the equations for a Möbius strip and they work perfectly. Here are the transformations


    • x' = (R + S Cos[0.5 t]) Cos[t]

    • y' = (R + S Cos[0.5 t]) Sin[t]

    • z' = S Sin[0.5 t]




where t$\in$ [0, 2 Pi] = 2 Pi x and S$\in$[-0.5, 0.5] = y - 0.5.




  1. With these new 3D points I can now do a surface plot in 3D, which shoud look something like this for the case of a cylinder: Cylinder But if I draw these points as a Möbius strip, I get weird anomalies. Here are the two cases I tried:




    • ListSurfacePlot3D -> I get weird anomalies. I tried tweaking MaxPlotPoints but it didn't do the trick. First case

    • ListPlot3D -> Works a bit better, but it also fills the hole in between and draws a weird joint. Second case




Here is the data sample of a 2D rectangle: Original


Here is the same data sample, but transformed for the case of Möbius: Transformed


Plot codes for the data


p1 = Graphics3D[Point[data3d], Boxed -> False, AspectRatio -> 1, 

BoxRatios -> Automatic, SphericalRegion -> True, PlotRange -> All,
ImageSize -> 350]
p2=
ListPlot3D[data3d, Boxed -> False, Axes -> False,
SphericalRegion -> True, AspectRatio -> 1, BoxRatios -> Automatic,
MaxPlotPoints -> 30, PlotRange -> All, ImageSize -> 350,
Mesh -> Automatic, PlotStyle -> Magenta]

Show[{p1, p2}]


Where ListPlot3D can also be changed with ListSurfacePlot3D.


I really appreciate your help.



Answer



Let u be the list of 2D points on a rectangle and x their transformed 3D coordinates on the Möbius strip.


{u, x} =
Import["http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=" <> #, "Package"] & /@
{"x4W9hB59", "3sfTBxhV"};

Because you were doing FEM, you must also have a triangulation of the points. But you haven't provided it, so I'll assume it to be the Delaunay triangulation of u.


t = First@Cases[ListDensityPlot[Join[#, {0}] & /@ u], Polygon[idx_] :> idx, Infinity];


Render x with this triangulation:


Graphics3D[GraphicsComplex[x, {EdgeForm[], Polygon /@ t}]]

enter image description here


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

list manipulation - Selecting multiple columns from a matrix?

Sample data: data = { {{2013, 1, 1}, 24.13, 167.67, 231.82}, {{2013, 1, 2}, 32.15, 170.92, 225.99}, {{2013, 1, 3}, 35.43, 172.68, 221.67}, {{2013, 1, 4}, 36.73, 173.05, 218.32}, {{2013, 1, 5}, 58.19, 165.96, 197.05}, {{2013, 1, 6}, 69.99, 163.50, 187.52}, {{2013, 1, 7}, 71.37, 154.21, 175.58}, {{2013, 1, 8}, 72.51, 149.66, 163.25}}; I want a DateListPlot with three graphs, so for a matrix formed by columns 1 and 2, one for columns 1 and 3, and 1 for columns 1 and 4. At the moment I'm using this code: data2 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 2]]}]; data3 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 3]]}]; data4 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 4]]}]; DateListPlot[{data2, data3, data4}, Joined -> True, Filling -> {3 -> {1}}] but I have a hunch that this can be done more efficiently. I don't like the Transpose s in particular. Any ideas? edit (for extra credit) What if I need to multiply the second column by 2, which in my solution is simp...