Skip to main content

list manipulation - Confused about how Partition works


I have a problem about the padding list about Partition command. For instance,


Partition[{a, b, c, d, e, f, g}, 3, 1, {-2, 1}, {x, y, z}]


{{z, a, b}, {a, b, c}, {b, c, d}, {c, d, e}, {d, e, f}, {e, f, g}, {f,g, y}, {g, y, z}}

However, my understanding about padding list shown as below:




enter image description here



Another example


Partition[{a, b, c, d, e, f}, 3, 3, {1, 1}]


 {{a, b, c}, {d, e, f}}

My understanding:




enter image description here



Question


Can someone give me a good explanation?



Answer



Example #1


Let me make your example a bit smaller for brevity:


Partition[{a, b, c, d}, 3, 1, {-2, 1}, {x, y, z}]



{{z, a, b}, {a, b, c}, {b, c, d}, {c, d, y}, {d, y, z}}

This is in effect:


PadRight[{a, b, c, d}, 7, {x, y, z}, 1]

Partition[%, 3, 1]


{z, a, b, c, d, y, z}


{{z, a, b}, {a, b, c}, {b, c, d}, {c, d, y}, {d, y, z}}

Think instead:


enter image description here +
enter image description here Equals
enter image description here


Example #2


The documentation states:


enter image description here



Critical to your example is: "appear at or after position kR in the last sublist."


Therefore in this case it does not matter if kR is any of: 1, 2, 3, -1, -2, -3, because each will be satisfied by:


{{a, b, c}, {d, e, f}}

Partition does not violate the cyclic order of the list. For the output to be as you anticipated:


{{a, b, c}, {d, e, f}, {f, a, b}}

The element f would have to be taken out of sequence; the next element should be a.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...
Post a Comment
Read more

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...
Post a Comment
Read more