Skip to main content

Defined Mesh Coordinates are Outside of Data Range for Interpolation Function


This relates to a previous question I had about formulating an interpolation over an unstructured grid.


A new issue I am running into (in this test example) is that some of the coordinates that are used to create the interpolation function are considered to be outside of the data range, and I am assuming extrapolation is then performed.


Here is my trial example: Instead of in the link above where I define my own points, in this case I am just forming the mesh from an implicit region, but the same problem arises in my previous trial in the link above.


Create region and mesh across said region:


Needs["NDSolve`FEM`"]
impReg = ImplicitRegion[z <= x^2 && x >= 0 && z >= 0, {x, z}]
impMesh = ToElementMesh[impReg, {{-1, 10}, {-1, 100}}]


(I put the bounds in the region for positive x and z values and then in the second line started the boundaries at -1 because when I do not do this points are created in the mesh that are not on the boundaries, which is something I need.)


Here is the highlighted mesh:


mesh from region


Here is the trial function I am interpolating over and then interpolation:


gImp = Function[{x, z}, Sqrt[x^2 + z^2]] @@@ impMesh["Coordinates"];
ifImp = ListInterpolation[gImp, impMesh]

When I run through plugging in each coordinate from the mesh, I get 4 points that are extrapolated:


ifImp @@@ impMesh["Coordinates"];


InterpolatingFunction::femdmval: Input value {0.,0.} lies outside the range of data in the interpolating function.
InterpolatingFunction::femdmval: Input value {0.25,0.} lies outside the range of data in the interpolating function.
InterpolatingFunction::femdmval: Input value {0.125,0.} lies outside the range of data in the interpolating function.
InterpolatingFunction::femdmval: Input value {0.375,0.} lies outside the range of data in the interpolating function.

Further investigation that I will not show reveals that many points around these 4 points give this error message, but I just found it odd that coordinates that were used in forming the interpolation function is giving this error. What is going on? How do I fix this?



Answer



I can not quite say if this is a bug or not, but I do have some workarounds for you. The problem is that the curved (second order) elements in the left lower part of the mesh are quite distorted and it's unclear at the moment why ElementMesh does not warn about that though.


Needs["NDSolve`FEM`"]

impReg = ImplicitRegion[z <= x^2 && x >= 0 && z >= 0, {x, z}];
impMesh = ToElementMesh[impReg, {{-1, 10}, {-1, 100}}]


coords = impMesh["Coordinates"];
coords[[1]]
{0.`, 0.`}

pp = Position[ElementIncidents[impMesh["MeshElements"]], 1][[1, {1, 2}]]
{1, 155}


ele = ElementIncidents[impMesh["MeshElements"]][[Sequence @@ pp]]
{145, 1, 146, 576, 577, 578}

Graphics[{
Line[coords[[ele]][[{1, 4, 2, 5, 3, 6, 1}]]]
, {Red, Point[coords[[ele]]]}
}]

enter image description here



Here are a few things you can do: One option may be to use a first order mesh (and perhaps refine the boundary of the mesh to get a good approximation):


impMesh = 
ToElementMesh[impReg, {{-1, 10}, {-1, 100}}, "MeshOrder" -> 1];
gImp = Function[{x, z}, Sqrt[x^2 + z^2]] @@@ impMesh["Coordinates"];
ifImp = ElementMeshInterpolation[{impMesh}, gImp];
ifImp[0, 0]
0.

Or to not allow curved elements (also in conjunction with a possible boundary refinement):


impMesh = 

ToElementMesh[impReg, {{-1, 10}, {-1, 100}},
"ImproveBoundaryPosition" -> False];
gImp = Function[{x, z}, Sqrt[x^2 + z^2]] @@@ impMesh["Coordinates"];
ifImp = ElementMeshInterpolation[{impMesh}, gImp];
ifImp[0, 0]
-5.55112*10^-17

I am going to file this as a bug/suggestion for improvement.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...