Natural boundary conditions variational methods

I am working on a problem of the calculus of variations. From the Variational Methods package, I can very conveniently use EulerEquations to get stationarity conditions in the form of Euler-Lagrange equations for my problem. Is there also a way to obtain expressions for the natural boundary conditions that are involved in making the functional stationary?

Answer

As far as I know there is no function currently in the Variational Methods package that does that. This function however should do the trick:

VariationalDBoundaries[f_,(y_)[x_,r___],boundary_]:=

 Module[{varY,Dfuncs,Dtimes,dummyfunc,natural,essential,w},
  w={x,r};
  Dfuncs=Union[Cases[{f},Derivative[__][y][__],Infinity]];
  Dtimes=(Head[Head[#1]]&)/@Dfuncs/.Derivative->List;
  GenerateBoundaryEqn[Dfun_]:=
   Module[{Dtime,DrevList,out},
    Dtime = Head[Head[Dfun/.Derivative->List]];
    DrevList = Transpose[{w,Dtime}];
    Reverse[Table[(-1)^(i+1),{i,Times@@Dtime}]];
    out=Flatten[#,1]&@Table[ReplaceAll[#,w[[j]]->boundary[[j]]]&/@

     {D[D[f,Dfun],Sequence@@ReplacePart[DrevList[[j;;]],{1,2}->Dtime[[j]]-i]],
     D[varY[Sequence@@w],Sequence@@ReplacePart[DrevList[[1;;j]],
     {j,2}->i-1]]},{j,Length[w]},{i,Dtime[[j]]}];
    out[[;;,1]]=out[[;;,1]]*Reverse[Table[(-1)^(i+1),{i,Plus@@Dtime}]];
     out];
  natural=GenerateBoundaryEqn[#]& /@Dfuncs;
  essential=Union[Flatten[natural,1][[;;,2]]];
  natural = Apply[Times,#,{1}]&/@natural/.List->Plus;
  natural=Coefficient[natural,#]&/@essential;
  Transpose[{natural, essential}] /. varY -> y

]

It could be used with single variable fucntionals VariationalDBoundaries[f, u[x],{x1}] or multi-variable functionals VariationalDBoundaries[f, u[x,y,...],{xo,yo,...}].It returns the first variational boundary conditions of the functional defined by the integrand f which is a function of u, its derivatives, and x,y,.... The boundary conditions are evaluated at a single boundary location given by {xo,yo,..} for each variable x,y,...

The function generates a list of ordered pairs where the first element is the natural boundary condition at the given location indicated by {xo,yo,..} and the second one is the associated essential boundary condition. Usually either the natural or the essential boundary condition should be equal to zero.

For example:

L=x*y*u[x,y]*D[u[x,y],x]+x*y*u[x,y]*D[u[x,y],y];
VariationalDBoundaries[L,u[x,y],{xo,yo}]

Output:

Comments

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

Is there a way to do conditional matrix loop using 'continue'

I have the following: n = 3; m = 5; ww = RandomReal[{0, 0.1}, {n, n}]; uu = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {m, n}]; pp = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {n, n}]; ss = RandomInteger[{0, 5}, {m, n}]; Grid[{{"ww", "uu", "pp", "ss"}, {ww // TableForm, uu // TableForm, pp // TableForm, ss // TableForm}}, Spacings -> {5, 2}, Dividers -> All] where I would like to look at every element of matrix ss and produce a matrix tt , with zeroes at the locations in ss which have zeroes, and in all other positions do the following: tt = (-1/Subscript[ww, m]) Log[(1 - uu)/(Subscript[pp, m - 1])], where Subscript[ww, m] is the value at index of ww matrix and where Subscript[pp, m - 1] is the value at index-1 of pp matrix. So for example if the first value ever read from matrix ss happens to be 2, then value taken from matrix ww would be from the row 2, but from pp would be from row 1. Also how to tell difference between a 0 as a valid value from within the matrix elemen...

Blog

Search This Blog