Skip to main content

Is there a way to do conditional matrix loop using 'continue'


enter image description hereI have the following:


n = 3;
m = 5;
ww = RandomReal[{0, 0.1}, {n, n}];
uu = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {m, n}];
pp = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {n, n}];
ss = RandomInteger[{0, 5}, {m, n}];
Grid[{{"ww", "uu", "pp", "ss"}, {ww // TableForm, uu // TableForm, 

   pp // TableForm, ss // TableForm}}, Spacings -> {5, 2}, 
 Dividers -> All]

where I would like to look at every element of matrix ss and produce a matrix tt, with zeroes at the locations in ss which have zeroes, and in all other positions do the following:


tt = (-1/Subscript[ww, m]) Log[(1 - uu)/(Subscript[pp, m - 1])],

where Subscript[ww, m] is the value at index of ww matrix and where Subscript[pp, m - 1] is the value at index-1 of pp matrix.


So for example if the first value ever read from matrix ss happens to be 2, then value taken from matrix ww would be from the row 2, but from pp would be from row 1.


Also how to tell difference between a 0 as a valid value from within the matrix elements to end of matrix if I do not know the actual size of the matrix beforehand?


Given the data as above, tt matrix would be like this: enter image description here




Answer



Two gaps in the information provided in the question : First, the elements of ss cannot be greater than 3 (row dimension of ww and pp). Second, how do you process the case ss[[i, j]] = 1 ? (Which row of pp do you use?) You need to change the rule so that either ss does not contain any 1s or treat the 1s as you treat 0s. In the following I restricted ss to values in {0, 2, 3}.


n = 3; m = 5;
ww = RandomReal[{0, 0.1}, {n, n}];
uu = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {m, n}];
pp = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {n, n}];
ss = RandomChoice[{0, 2, 3}, {m, n}];

Define tt as


tt = SparseArray[{i_, j_} /; ss[[i, j]] != 0 :>

   (-1/ww[[ss[[i, j]], j]]) Log[(1 - uu[[i, j]])/ pp[[ss[[i, j]] - 1, j]]], {m, n}]

With this,


Grid[Transpose@{{"ww", "uu", "pp", "ss", "tt"}, 
  TableForm /@ {ww, uu, pp, ss, Normal[tt]}}, Spacings -> {5, 2}, Dividers -> All]

enter image description here


UPDATE: Incorporating OP's latest clarifications:


ww2 = Prepend[ww, {a, b, c}];
f2[i_, j_] := (-1/ww2[[ss[[i, j]] + 1, j]]) Log[(1 - uu[[i, j]])/pp[[ss[[i, j]], j]]];

tt2 = SparseArray[{i_, j_} /; ss[[i, j]] != 0 :> f2[i, j], {m, n}];
Grid[Transpose@{{"uu", "ww", "pp", "ss", "ww2", "tt2"}, 
    TableForm /@ {uu, ww, pp, ss, ww2, Normal[tt2]}},
 Spacings -> {5, 2}, 
 Dividers -> {{All, {1 -> Thick, -1 -> Thick}}, 
              {All, {5 -> Thick, 1 -> Thick, -1 -> Thick}}}]

enter image description here


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...
Post a Comment
Read more

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...
Post a Comment
Read more