Skip to main content

differential equations - Power::infy: "Infinite expression 1/0. encountered" (ODE Solution using NDSolve)


While solving the following ode,


Eq1 = f'''[x] - f'[x]*f'[x] + f[x]*f''[x] - K1*(2  f'[x]* f'''[x] - f[x]* f''''[x] - f''[x]*f''[x]) - f'[x] == 0

with the conditions


deqsys = {Eq1, f[0] == 0, f'[0] == 1, f'[N1] == 0, f''[N1] == 0}

and


K1 = 1.0;


Here N1=2, which is an approximation of N1=Infinity. It does not sound right but even for N1=2, I am unable to obtain a solution using NDSolve.


Now calling upon the numerical solver


NDSolve[deqsys, f, {x, 0, N1}]

I'm facing this persistent error,



Power::infy: "Infinite expression 1/0. encountered."



I have no idea, whether there is something wrong with the syntax, or the ode is a stiff one, or there is no solution to it?



Answer




Here's a way that gets fairly close. Perhaps further tweaking could improve the result.


Block[{K1 = 1},
{sol} = NDSolve[deqsys, f, {x, 0, 2},
Method -> {"Shooting",
"StartingInitialConditions" ->
{f[0] == 10^-4, f'[0] == 1, f''[0] == 0.1, f'''[0] == -0.1},
Method -> "StiffnessSwitching"}]
]

This avoids the singularity when f[x] == 0 by starting the boundary condition f[0] close to zero. Then the shooting method tries to get the initial conditions so that the boundary conditions are satisfied. They get close, but not close enough for the default NDSolve measure:




NDSolve::berr: There are significant errors {0.00267854,-4.06858*10^-11,0.0000859285,0.000110968} in the boundary value residuals. Returning the best solution found. >>



Plot[{f[x], f'[x], f''[x]} /. First[sol] // Evaluate, {x, 0, 2}]

Mathematica graphics


One can try raising "MaxIterations" higher than 100.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.