Skip to main content

assignment - Assigning values to a list of variable names


As part of a calculation I need to do something like this


Evaluate[{aaa, bbb, ccc}[[ index]]] = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}

so if index is 1 then {1, 2, 3, 4, 5} will be stored into the variable aaa.
But if I re-evaluate this it does not work because aaa is now a list and not a variable. I tried various options with Hold[] etc but did not manage to solve this.




Answer



This is a fairly natural question and I feel it is worthy of attention. I am going to answer in two parts. First, I am going to show a method that is more appropriate for Mathematica programming and which I recommend you use instead. Then I will show how to force the action you are attempting.





The common way to accomplish programmatically selected assignments is to use indexed variables. This allows you to assemble a "variable" from inert parts. For example, one would use a single variable var and simply make assignments (SeedRandom[1] for a consistent result):


SeedRandom[1]

Do[
var[i] = RandomInteger[9],
{i, {1, 2, 3, 2, 3, 1, 3}}

]

Or recall them:


var /@ {1, 2, 3}


{0, 7, 8}

If you desire a certain name be attached to a value you can index with Strings.


names = {"aaa", "bbb", "ccc"};


i = 1;

var[ names[[i]] ] = Sqrt[2]; (* dummy first assignment *)

var[ names[[i]] ] = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5};

var["aaa"]



{1, 2, 3, 4, 5}

In passing, depending on your application you may find Rules applicable.


Associations


Mathematica 10 introduced Associations which are like self-contained "indexed variables." Use is similar but you need to start with an (optionally empty) Association before you make assignments. Example:


SeedRandom[1]

asc = <||>;

Do[asc[i] = RandomInteger[9], {i, {1, 2, 3, 2, 3, 1, 3}}]


asc


<|1 -> 0, 2 -> 7, 3 -> 8|>

Values may be recalled using Map, Replace, or Lookup; for a comparison see:



For some ideas of when and why one might use associations over "indexed variables" see:







Suppose you need the behavior you asked for to keep a large program working without extensive modification.


Method #1


This works because Part preserves the head of the expression, here Unevaluated.


Ignore the syntax highlighting in Unevaluated: this is a nonstandard but safe use.


This could easily use the same syntax as Method #2: assign[symbols_, idx_, val_] :=


ClearAll[aaa, bbb, ccc, assign]
assign[idx_, val_] := (# = val) & @ symbols[[1, {idx}]]


symbols = Hold @ Unevaluated[aaa, bbb, ccc];

assign[1, "dummy"];
assign[1, Range@5];

aaa


{1, 2, 3, 4, 5}


Method #2


This uses the injector pattern in preference to Unevaluated.


ClearAll[aaa, bbb, ccc, f1, assign]
assign[symbols_, idx_, val_] := symbols[[{idx}]] /. _[x_] :> (x = val)

symbols = Hold[aaa, bbb, ccc];

assign[symbols, 1, "dummy"];
assign[symbols, 1, Range@5];


aaa


{1, 2, 3, 4, 5}

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.