Skip to main content

assignment - Assigning values to a list of variable names


As part of a calculation I need to do something like this


Evaluate[{aaa, bbb, ccc}[[ index]]] = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}

so if index is 1 then {1, 2, 3, 4, 5} will be stored into the variable aaa.
But if I re-evaluate this it does not work because aaa is now a list and not a variable. I tried various options with Hold[] etc but did not manage to solve this.




Answer



This is a fairly natural question and I feel it is worthy of attention. I am going to answer in two parts. First, I am going to show a method that is more appropriate for Mathematica programming and which I recommend you use instead. Then I will show how to force the action you are attempting.





The common way to accomplish programmatically selected assignments is to use indexed variables. This allows you to assemble a "variable" from inert parts. For example, one would use a single variable var and simply make assignments (SeedRandom[1] for a consistent result):


SeedRandom[1]

Do[
var[i] = RandomInteger[9],
{i, {1, 2, 3, 2, 3, 1, 3}}

]

Or recall them:


var /@ {1, 2, 3}


{0, 7, 8}

If you desire a certain name be attached to a value you can index with Strings.


names = {"aaa", "bbb", "ccc"};


i = 1;

var[ names[[i]] ] = Sqrt[2]; (* dummy first assignment *)

var[ names[[i]] ] = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5};

var["aaa"]



{1, 2, 3, 4, 5}

In passing, depending on your application you may find Rules applicable.


Associations


Mathematica 10 introduced Associations which are like self-contained "indexed variables." Use is similar but you need to start with an (optionally empty) Association before you make assignments. Example:


SeedRandom[1]

asc = <||>;

Do[asc[i] = RandomInteger[9], {i, {1, 2, 3, 2, 3, 1, 3}}]


asc


<|1 -> 0, 2 -> 7, 3 -> 8|>

Values may be recalled using Map, Replace, or Lookup; for a comparison see:



For some ideas of when and why one might use associations over "indexed variables" see:







Suppose you need the behavior you asked for to keep a large program working without extensive modification.


Method #1


This works because Part preserves the head of the expression, here Unevaluated.


Ignore the syntax highlighting in Unevaluated: this is a nonstandard but safe use.


This could easily use the same syntax as Method #2: assign[symbols_, idx_, val_] :=


ClearAll[aaa, bbb, ccc, assign]
assign[idx_, val_] := (# = val) & @ symbols[[1, {idx}]]


symbols = Hold @ Unevaluated[aaa, bbb, ccc];

assign[1, "dummy"];
assign[1, Range@5];

aaa


{1, 2, 3, 4, 5}


Method #2


This uses the injector pattern in preference to Unevaluated.


ClearAll[aaa, bbb, ccc, f1, assign]
assign[symbols_, idx_, val_] := symbols[[{idx}]] /. _[x_] :> (x = val)

symbols = Hold[aaa, bbb, ccc];

assign[symbols, 1, "dummy"];
assign[symbols, 1, Range@5];


aaa


{1, 2, 3, 4, 5}

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...