Skip to main content

assignment - Assigning values to a list of variable names


As part of a calculation I need to do something like this


Evaluate[{aaa, bbb, ccc}[[ index]]] = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}

so if index is 1 then {1, 2, 3, 4, 5} will be stored into the variable aaa.
But if I re-evaluate this it does not work because aaa is now a list and not a variable. I tried various options with Hold[] etc but did not manage to solve this.




Answer



This is a fairly natural question and I feel it is worthy of attention. I am going to answer in two parts. First, I am going to show a method that is more appropriate for Mathematica programming and which I recommend you use instead. Then I will show how to force the action you are attempting.





The common way to accomplish programmatically selected assignments is to use indexed variables. This allows you to assemble a "variable" from inert parts. For example, one would use a single variable var and simply make assignments (SeedRandom[1] for a consistent result):


SeedRandom[1]

Do[
var[i] = RandomInteger[9],
{i, {1, 2, 3, 2, 3, 1, 3}}

]

Or recall them:


var /@ {1, 2, 3}


{0, 7, 8}

If you desire a certain name be attached to a value you can index with Strings.


names = {"aaa", "bbb", "ccc"};


i = 1;

var[ names[[i]] ] = Sqrt[2]; (* dummy first assignment *)

var[ names[[i]] ] = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5};

var["aaa"]



{1, 2, 3, 4, 5}

In passing, depending on your application you may find Rules applicable.


Associations


Mathematica 10 introduced Associations which are like self-contained "indexed variables." Use is similar but you need to start with an (optionally empty) Association before you make assignments. Example:


SeedRandom[1]

asc = <||>;

Do[asc[i] = RandomInteger[9], {i, {1, 2, 3, 2, 3, 1, 3}}]


asc


<|1 -> 0, 2 -> 7, 3 -> 8|>

Values may be recalled using Map, Replace, or Lookup; for a comparison see:



For some ideas of when and why one might use associations over "indexed variables" see:







Suppose you need the behavior you asked for to keep a large program working without extensive modification.


Method #1


This works because Part preserves the head of the expression, here Unevaluated.


Ignore the syntax highlighting in Unevaluated: this is a nonstandard but safe use.


This could easily use the same syntax as Method #2: assign[symbols_, idx_, val_] :=


ClearAll[aaa, bbb, ccc, assign]
assign[idx_, val_] := (# = val) & @ symbols[[1, {idx}]]


symbols = Hold @ Unevaluated[aaa, bbb, ccc];

assign[1, "dummy"];
assign[1, Range@5];

aaa


{1, 2, 3, 4, 5}


Method #2


This uses the injector pattern in preference to Unevaluated.


ClearAll[aaa, bbb, ccc, f1, assign]
assign[symbols_, idx_, val_] := symbols[[{idx}]] /. _[x_] :> (x = val)

symbols = Hold[aaa, bbb, ccc];

assign[symbols, 1, "dummy"];
assign[symbols, 1, Range@5];


aaa


{1, 2, 3, 4, 5}

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

front end - keyboard shortcut to invoke Insert new matrix

I frequently need to type in some matrices, and the menu command Insert > Table/Matrix > New... allows matrices with lines drawn between columns and rows, which is very helpful. I would like to make a keyboard shortcut for it, but cannot find the relevant frontend token command (4209405) for it. Since the FullForm[] and InputForm[] of matrices with lines drawn between rows and columns is the same as those without lines, it's hard to do this via 3rd party system-wide text expanders (e.g. autohotkey or atext on mac). How does one assign a keyboard shortcut for the menu item Insert > Table/Matrix > New... , preferably using only mathematica? Thanks! Answer In the MenuSetup.tr (for linux located in the $InstallationDirectory/SystemFiles/FrontEnd/TextResources/X/ directory), I changed the line MenuItem["&New...", "CreateGridBoxDialog"] to read MenuItem["&New...", "CreateGridBoxDialog", MenuKey["m", Modifiers-...

How to thread a list

I have data in format data = {{a1, a2}, {b1, b2}, {c1, c2}, {d1, d2}} Tableform: I want to thread it to : tdata = {{{a1, b1}, {a2, b2}}, {{a1, c1}, {a2, c2}}, {{a1, d1}, {a2, d2}}} Tableform: And I would like to do better then pseudofunction[n_] := Transpose[{data2[[1]], data2[[n]]}]; SetAttributes[pseudofunction, Listable]; Range[2, 4] // pseudofunction Here is my benchmark data, where data3 is normal sample of real data. data3 = Drop[ExcelWorkBook[[Column1 ;; Column4]], None, 1]; data2 = {a #, b #, c #, d #} & /@ Range[1, 10^5]; data = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {10^6, 4}]; Here is my benchmark code kptnw[list_] := Transpose[{Table[First@#, {Length@# - 1}], Rest@#}, {3, 1, 2}] &@list kptnw2[list_] := Transpose[{ConstantArray[First@#, Length@# - 1], Rest@#}, {3, 1, 2}] &@list OleksandrR[list_] := Flatten[Outer[List, List@First[list], Rest[list], 1], {{2}, {1, 4}}] paradox2[list_] := Partition[Riffle[list[[1]], #], 2] & /@ Drop[list, 1] RM[list_] := FoldList[Transpose[{First@li...

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...