Skip to main content

differential equations - How to access and change the state variable values in NDsolve`Iterate?


Essentially I am trying to calculate the Lyapunov exponent the naive way; i.e., using the method described here by Vaggelis_Z.


In each pass of the loop over time a new trajectory is spawned by adding a small displacement vector to the state and running it for a single time step. This is repeated at each time step after renormalisation of the displacement vector.


While invoking the complete NDSolve within the loop works OK, I can see that the costs for a 10+ dimensional system of ODEs will be prohibitive.


I want to speed up things by accessing and changing the state variables and resubmitting them in NDSolve`Iterate inside the loop. How can I do that?


MarcoB, here's the code I have got


 (* original ODE's for the Sprott system *)
 f1 = (y1[t]*z1[t] + 0.01);
 f2 = x1[t]*x1[t] - y1[t];

 f3 = 1 - 4*x1[t] ;
(* cloned ODE's for shadowing the system *)
 f4 = (y2[t]*z2[t] + 0.01);
 f5 = x2[t]*x2[t] - y2[t];
 f6 = 1 - 4*x2[t] ;
 (* starting initial conditions for the original trajectory *)
 x10 = 1; y10 = 1; z10 = 0;
 dx0 = 10^-8;
 (* starting initial conditions for the shadowing trajectory *)
 x20 = x10 + dx0; y20 = y10; z20 = z10;

 tin = 0; tfin = 1000;
 dt = .01;
 iterat = tfin/dt;
 acc = 12;

 lexp = {};
  sum = 0;
 d0 = Sqrt[(x10 - x20)^2 + (y10 - y20)^2 + (z10 - z20)^2];
 Timing[For[i = 1, i < iterat, i++, 
  eqns = {x1'[t] == f1, y1'[t] == f2, z1'[t] == f3, x2'[t] == f4, 

  y2'[t] == f5, z2'[t] == f6, x1[0] == x10, y1[0] == y10, 
  z1[0] == z10, x2[0] == x20, y2[0] == y20, z2[0] == z20};
  sol = NDSolve[
  eqns, {x1[t], y1[t], z1[t], x2[t], y2[t], z2[t]}, {t, 0, dt}, 
  MaxSteps -> Infinity, PrecisionGoal -> acc, AccuracyGoal -> acc];
  (* solution functions  *)
  xx1[t_] = x1[t] /. sol[[1]]; 
  yy1[t_] = y1[t] /. sol[[1]]; 
  zz1[t_] = z1[t] /. sol[[1]]; 
  xx2[t_] = x2[t] /. sol[[1]]; 

  yy2[t_] = y2[t] /. sol[[1]]; 
  zz2[t_] = z2[t] /. sol[[1]]; 
  d1 = Sqrt[(xx1[dt] - xx2[dt])^2 + (yy1[dt] - 
    yy2[dt])^2 + (zz1[dt] - zz2[dt])^2]; 
  sum += Log[d1/d0]; 
  lyap = sum/(dt*i); 
  AppendTo[lexp, {dt*i, Log10[lyap]}]; 
  (* components of  displacement vector normalised to d0 *)
  vc1 = (xx1[dt] - xx2[dt])*(d0/d1); 
  vc2 = (yy1[dt] - yy2[dt])*(d0/d1); 

  vc3 = (zz1[dt] - zz2[dt])*(d0/d1); 
  (*new initial conditions for the original trajectory *)
  x10 = xx1[dt]; 
  y10 = yy1[dt]; 
  z10 = zz1[dt]; 
  (*  new initial conditions spawned for the shadowing trajectory *)
  x20 = x10 + vc1; 
  y20 = y10 + vc2; 
  z20 = z10 + vc3;
   i = i++;

   If[Mod[dt*i, 10] == 0, 
    Print["  t = ", dt*i, " , ", "largest Lyapunov  = ", lyap]]]]

Answer



The run time of the code in the question is 202 seconds on my PC. Even before employing the component structure of NDSolve, it is helpful to eliminate unnecessary code to both increase speed and increase readability. Doing so yields,


f1 = (y1[t]*z1[t] + 0.01);
f2 = x1[t]*x1[t] - y1[t];
f3 = 1 - 4*x1[t] ;
f4 = (y2[t]*z2[t] + 0.01);
f5 = x2[t]*x2[t] - y2[t];
f6 = 1 - 4*x2[t] ;

x10 = 1; y10 = 1; z10 = 0; dx0 = 10^-8;
x20 = x10 + dx0; y20 = y10; z20 = z10;
tin = 0; tfin = 1000; dt = .01; iterat = Round[tfin/dt]; acc = 12;
eqns = {x1'[t] == f1, y1'[t] == f2, z1'[t] == f3, 
        x2'[t] == f4, y2'[t] == f5, z2'[t] == f6};

lexp = ConstantArray[0, iterat - 1]; sum = 0;
d0 = Norm[{x10 , y10, z10} - {x20 , y20, z20}];
Timing[Do [
    ic = {x1[0] == x10, y1[0] == y10, z1[0] == z10, 

          x2[0] == x20, y2[0] == y20, z2[0] == z20};
    sol = Last /@ Flatten@NDSolve[{eqns, ic}, {x1[dt], y1[dt], z1[dt], 
        x2[dt], y2[dt], z2[dt]}, {t, 0, dt}, 
        MaxSteps -> Infinity, PrecisionGoal -> acc, AccuracyGoal -> acc];
    d1 = Norm[sol[[1 ;; 3]] - sol[[4 ;; 6]]]; 
    sum += Log[d1/d0]; 
    lyap = sum/(dt*i); 
    lexp[[i]] = {dt*i, Log10[lyap]}; 
    {x10 , y10, z10} = sol[[1 ;; 3]]; 
    {x20 , y20, z20} = {x10 , y10, z10} + (sol[[1 ;; 3]] - sol[[4 ;; 6]]) (d0/d1); 

    If[Mod[dt*i, 10] == 0, 
    Print["  t = ", dt*i, " , ", "largest Lyapunov  = ", lyap]], {i, iterat - 1}]]

The run time now is only 114 seconds. Although many changes were made, most of the savings were achieved by replacing AppendTo[lexp, {dt*i, Log10[lyap]}] by lexp[[i]] = {dt*i, Log10[lyap]}. AppendTo is notoriously slow for large arrays, here 100 000 elements. Asking NDSolve to return only the final values, {x1[dt], y1[dt], z1[dt], x2[dt], y2[dt], z2[dt]}, instead of {x1[t], y1[t], z1[t], x2[t], y2[t], z2[t]} also helps.


Now, employ the NDSolve Component Structure, which requires only minor modifications to the preceding code.


f1 = (y1[t]*z1[t] + 0.01);
f2 = x1[t]*x1[t] - y1[t];
f3 = 1 - 4*x1[t] ;
f4 = (y2[t]*z2[t] + 0.01);
f5 = x2[t]*x2[t] - y2[t];

f6 = 1 - 4*x2[t] ;
x10 = 1; y10 = 1; z10 = 0; dx0 = 10^-8;
x20 = x10 + dx0; y20 = y10; z20 = z10;
tin = 0; tfin = 1000; dt = .01; iterat = Round[tfin/dt]; acc = 12;
eqns = {x1'[t] == f1, y1'[t] == f2, z1'[t] == f3, 
        x2'[t] == f4, y2'[t] == f5, z2'[t] == f6};
ic = {x1[0] == x10, y1[0] == y10, z1[0] == z10, x2[0] == x20, y2[0] == y20, z2[0] == z20};
state = First@NDSolve`ProcessEquations[{eqns, ic}, 
    {x1[dt], y1[dt], z1[dt], x2[dt], y2[dt], z2[dt]}, t , 
    MaxSteps -> Infinity, PrecisionGoal -> acc, AccuracyGoal -> acc];


lexp = ConstantArray[0, iterat - 1]; sum = 0;
d0 = Norm[{x10 , y10, z10} - {x20 , y20, z20}];
Timing[Do [
    ic = {x1[0] == x10, y1[0] == y10, z1[0] == z10, 
          x2[0] == x20, y2[0] == y20, z2[0] == z20};
    newstate = First@NDSolve`Reinitialize[state, ic];
    NDSolve`Iterate[newstate, dt];
    sol = Last /@ NDSolve`ProcessSolutions[newstate]; 
    d1 = Norm[sol[[1 ;; 3]] - sol[[4 ;; 6]]]; 

    sum += Log[d1/d0]; 
    lyap = sum/(dt*i); 
    lexp[[i]] = {dt*i, Log10[lyap]}; 
    {x10 , y10, z10} = sol[[1 ;; 3]]; 
    {x20 , y20, z20} = {x10 , y10, z10} + (sol[[1 ;; 3]] - sol[[4 ;; 6]]) (d0/d1); 
    If[Mod[dt*i, 10] == 0, Print["  t = ", dt*i, " , ", "largest Lyapunov  = ", lyap]], 
{i, iterat - 1}]]

Run time now is only 34 seconds. This large additional savings results from moving NDSolve`ProcessEquations out of the loop


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...
Post a Comment
Read more

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...
Post a Comment
Read more