Skip to main content

manipulate - Question about making TabView remember what tab to open


Background: Consider the following ( for the purpose of illustrating this question ) simplified, but working snippet of code.


 TabView[

{
{patt, "Pattern" -> 1},
{motif, "Motif" -> Column[{
Button["Type", Print[" NOT IMPLEMENTED YET"], ImageSize -> 100],
Button["New shape", Print[" NOT IMPLEMENTED YET"], ImageSize -> 100],
Button["Pixel", Print[" NOT IMPLEMENTED YET"], ImageSize -> 100]}]}
},
Dynamic[tab]]

I have a GUI in a Module / Manipulate construction which contains a tabview that displays several views of the same data on its tabs. Each tab contains a series of buttons to further specify the particular view on that tab. Each tab consists several buttons and other controls, i.e. setterbars, 2D sliders. After each click or other action on a control the data is modified and all views are recalculated and displayed on the tabs.



The issue is that after each tab the tabview always returns to page 1. I have already made accomodations by using the following format of TabView:


  TabView[{ 
{value1, "Tabname"->CodeOnTab1},
{valueN, "Tabname"->CodeOnTabn} },
Dynamic[VAR]

As I understand the Tabview opens tabN if VAR is set to valueN. This leads to the following question: what is the best =coding strategy= to make a TabView aware of the tab it should display ( open ) when it is re-displayed ( considering the last user action ) ? The goal / criteria is: minimal code use.



Answer



I may have misunderstood your problem, but it looks like you just need to create a persistent local variable keeping the value of the tab which was last open. One way to do this:


DynamicModule[{tab},

myCustomTab[] :=
TabView[
{
{patt, "Pattern" -> 1},
{motif, "Motif" ->
Column[{
Button["Type", Print[" NOT IMPLEMENTED YET"], ImageSize -> 100],
Button["New shape", Print[" NOT IMPLEMENTED YET"], ImageSize -> 100],
Button["Pixel", Print[" NOT IMPLEMENTED YET"], ImageSize -> 100]}]}
},

Dynamic[tab]]
]

What matters is that you create a closure, so the variable tab is not local to the function myCustomTab (in the sense that it is not re-initialized on every function's invocation).


EDIT


Ok, it is probably a good time to explain what I mean by code generation, since I mentioned this technique many times already. Basically, I mean that you will be better off by creating your own DSL for UI. I will illustrate it here simplistically with rule application, but generally I would rather use recursion, which is more powerful. You can notice that your code is full of repeated elements, and this is true even for such a small code snippet. Here is one way to reduce the boilerplate:


This is a function written by @Szabolcs, which will be handy here


ClearAll[withRules]
SetAttributes[withRules, HoldAll]
withRules[rules_, expr_] :=

First@PreemptProtect@Internal`InheritedBlock[
{Rule, RuleDelayed},
SetAttributes[{Rule, RuleDelayed}, HoldFirst];
Hold[expr] /. rules
]

This is the starting point:


myTab = 
myTabView[
{"Pattern" -> 1,

"Motif" -> Column[{
myButton["Type", noimpl[]],
myButton["New shape", noimpl[]],
myButton["Pixel", noimpl[]]}]
}];

This is an auxiliary function:


Clear[dressTabView];
dressTabView[lrules_] :=
t : myTabView[{__Rule}] :>

DynamicModule[{tab},
Append[
Replace[t, e : (label_ -> w_) :> {withRules[lrules, label], e}, 2],
Dynamic[tab]]];

This is a chain of transformations needed to generate your widget with tab memory:


myTab /. dressTabView[{"Motif" :> motif, "Pattern" :> patt}] /.
myButton[args__] :> Button[args, ImageSize -> 100] /.
noimpl[] :> Print[" NOT IMPLEMENTED YET"] /.
myTabView -> TabView


The main point is, as usual, to separate the specific from the general.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...