Skip to main content

How to remap graph properties?


Graph objects support both custom properties, which do not have special meanings, and standard properties, which may be used by some functions.


When importing from formats such as GraphML, we usually get a result with custom properties.


What is the simplest way to remap one property to another, e.g. to remap a custom property to a standard one so it can be used with various functions?




Example: Let's get Zachary's karate club network with edge weights and vertex names from here: http://nexus.igraph.org/api/dataset_info?id=1&format=html


g = Import[

"http://nexus.igraph.org/api/dataset?id=1&format=GraphML", {"ZIP", "karate.GraphML"}]

I can remap "name" to VertexLabels and "weights" to EdgeWeight like this:


sp[prop_][g_] := SetProperty[g, prop]

g2 = g //
sp[EdgeWeight -> (PropertyValue[{g, #}, "weight"] & /@ EdgeList[g])] //
sp[VertexLabels -> (# -> PropertyValue[{g, #}, "name"] & /@ VertexList[g])]

I do find this quite tedious though. I am wondering if there are easier, more streamlined ways to do it.



For example, with igraph this is usually as easy as g.betweeness(weights="weight") (Python) to use the "weight" attribute as edge weights for a betweenness calculation. I know that WeightedAdjacencyMatrix does support such a simple syntax: WeightedAdjacencyMatrix[g, EdgeWeight -> "weight"] uses the "weight" attribute for the matrix. But I don't know if there are simple syntaxes like this in other situations.



Answer



Slightly more cumbersome alternative to your sp (hopefully little less tedious to use):


ClearAll[mapF]
mapF[pr1_ -> pr2_][g_] := SetProperty[g,
pr1 -> Cases[Options@g, Rule[a_, {___, Rule[pr2, v_], ___}] :> Rule[a, v], Infinity]];

mapF[r : (_ -> _) ..][g_] := Fold[mapF[#2][#] &, g, {r}];

g3 = g // mapF[VertexLabels -> "name"]


Mathematica graphics


g4 = g // mapF[VertexLabels -> "name", EdgeWeight -> "weight", VertexSize -> "Faction"]; 

PropertyValue[{g4, #}, VertexLabels] & /@ VertexList[g4]


Mathematica graphics



PropertyValue[g4, EdgeWeight]



{"4", "5", "3", "3", "3", "3", "2", "2", "2", "3", "1", "3", "2", "2", "2", "2", "6", "3", "4", "5", "1", "2", "2", "2", "3", "4", "5", "1", "3", "2", "2", "2", "3", "3", "3", "2", "3", "5", "3", "3", "3", "3", "3", "4", "2", "3", "3", "2", "3", "4", "1", "2", "1", "3", "1", "2", "3", "5", "4", "3", "5", "4", "2", "3", "2", "7", "4", "2", "4", "2", "2", "4", "2", "3", "3", "4", "4", "5"}



Note: the values of weight are strings.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...