Skip to main content

How to remap graph properties?


Graph objects support both custom properties, which do not have special meanings, and standard properties, which may be used by some functions.


When importing from formats such as GraphML, we usually get a result with custom properties.


What is the simplest way to remap one property to another, e.g. to remap a custom property to a standard one so it can be used with various functions?




Example: Let's get Zachary's karate club network with edge weights and vertex names from here: http://nexus.igraph.org/api/dataset_info?id=1&format=html


g = Import[

"http://nexus.igraph.org/api/dataset?id=1&format=GraphML", {"ZIP", "karate.GraphML"}]

I can remap "name" to VertexLabels and "weights" to EdgeWeight like this:


sp[prop_][g_] := SetProperty[g, prop]

g2 = g //
sp[EdgeWeight -> (PropertyValue[{g, #}, "weight"] & /@ EdgeList[g])] //
sp[VertexLabels -> (# -> PropertyValue[{g, #}, "name"] & /@ VertexList[g])]

I do find this quite tedious though. I am wondering if there are easier, more streamlined ways to do it.



For example, with igraph this is usually as easy as g.betweeness(weights="weight") (Python) to use the "weight" attribute as edge weights for a betweenness calculation. I know that WeightedAdjacencyMatrix does support such a simple syntax: WeightedAdjacencyMatrix[g, EdgeWeight -> "weight"] uses the "weight" attribute for the matrix. But I don't know if there are simple syntaxes like this in other situations.



Answer



Slightly more cumbersome alternative to your sp (hopefully little less tedious to use):


ClearAll[mapF]
mapF[pr1_ -> pr2_][g_] := SetProperty[g,
pr1 -> Cases[Options@g, Rule[a_, {___, Rule[pr2, v_], ___}] :> Rule[a, v], Infinity]];

mapF[r : (_ -> _) ..][g_] := Fold[mapF[#2][#] &, g, {r}];

g3 = g // mapF[VertexLabels -> "name"]


Mathematica graphics


g4 = g // mapF[VertexLabels -> "name", EdgeWeight -> "weight", VertexSize -> "Faction"]; 

PropertyValue[{g4, #}, VertexLabels] & /@ VertexList[g4]


Mathematica graphics



PropertyValue[g4, EdgeWeight]



{"4", "5", "3", "3", "3", "3", "2", "2", "2", "3", "1", "3", "2", "2", "2", "2", "6", "3", "4", "5", "1", "2", "2", "2", "3", "4", "5", "1", "3", "2", "2", "2", "3", "3", "3", "2", "3", "5", "3", "3", "3", "3", "3", "4", "2", "3", "3", "2", "3", "4", "1", "2", "1", "3", "1", "2", "3", "5", "4", "3", "5", "4", "2", "3", "2", "7", "4", "2", "4", "2", "2", "4", "2", "3", "3", "4", "4", "5"}



Note: the values of weight are strings.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

list manipulation - Selecting multiple columns from a matrix?

Sample data: data = { {{2013, 1, 1}, 24.13, 167.67, 231.82}, {{2013, 1, 2}, 32.15, 170.92, 225.99}, {{2013, 1, 3}, 35.43, 172.68, 221.67}, {{2013, 1, 4}, 36.73, 173.05, 218.32}, {{2013, 1, 5}, 58.19, 165.96, 197.05}, {{2013, 1, 6}, 69.99, 163.50, 187.52}, {{2013, 1, 7}, 71.37, 154.21, 175.58}, {{2013, 1, 8}, 72.51, 149.66, 163.25}}; I want a DateListPlot with three graphs, so for a matrix formed by columns 1 and 2, one for columns 1 and 3, and 1 for columns 1 and 4. At the moment I'm using this code: data2 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 2]]}]; data3 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 3]]}]; data4 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 4]]}]; DateListPlot[{data2, data3, data4}, Joined -> True, Filling -> {3 -> {1}}] but I have a hunch that this can be done more efficiently. I don't like the Transpose s in particular. Any ideas? edit (for extra credit) What if I need to multiply the second column by 2, which in my solution is simp...

calculus and analysis - Integral of the Sinc product

Let us consider the following integral $$ B_n = \int_0^\infty \prod_{k=1,3,5,\dots}^n\frac{\sin (x/k)}{x/k}dx $$ By definition, Sinc[x] == Sin[x]/x , therefore B[n_?OddQ] := Integrate[Product[Sinc[x/k], {k, 1, n, 2}], {x, 0, Infinity}] B /@ Range[1, 13, 2] {Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2} OK, everything is fine. But... B[15] 467807924713440738696537864469 Pi/935615849440640907310521750000 What's going on? Answer As Eckhard wrote in comments B[n] is the n-th Borwein integral . (The letter B was not accidental :) ) This funny properties of Borwein integrals is related to the Fourier transform of Sinc function FourierTransform[Sinc[x], x, k] 1/2 Sqrt[Pi/2] (Sign[1 - k] + Sign[1 + k]) Plot[%, {k, -2, 2}, Filling -> 0] which is the box function. The result is $\pi/2$ while the sum $$ 1/3+1/5+\dots+1/n $$ B_n = \frac{\pi}{2} - \pi \bigg(\sum_{k=3,5,\ldots}^n\frac{1}{k} -1\biggr)^\frac{n-1}{2}\prod_{k=3,5,\dots}^n\frac{k}{k-1}. $$ For $n=15$ it is equal to $$ \frac{46780...