Skip to main content

Create complicated text formulas in graphics


I want to put somewhat complicated, or at least non-standardly formatted, text on some of my graphics. For example, I'd like to be able to use f^[4](x) (where the ^[4] should obviously be a superscript rather than f^(4)[x] for the fourth derivative as a plot label. I'd like to control the formatting of various mathematical objects (for example, I'd like x^2+x+1 to be written that way rather than as 1+x+x^2), and the like.


The only way I've found for doing this is actually building up the string using StyleBox'es, which is both time-consuming and ugly. Am I missing something?



Answer



The general answer for what you appear to be doing is to wrap your expressions in HoldForm. However, it depends on how you include the expression. For example, here I'm using PlotLabel and have no problem:



Plot[x^2 + x + 1, {x, 0, 1}, PlotLabel -> x^2 + x + 1] 

plotlabel


However, what if I want to permute the order of the terms to x + 1 + x^2? Then HoldForm does the job:


Plot[x^2 + x + 1, {x, 0, 1}, PlotLabel -> HoldForm[x + 1 + x^2]]

plotlabel 2


Edit


I just noticed the second part of your question about the derivative format. The documentation on formatting is indeed somewhat confusing because it's spread through different pages. Maybe that has to do with the fact that there are so many different methods that it's hard to identify the "officially preferred" approach. I'm thinking, for example, of the Notation package which seems like it's supposed to make custom notation easier but which is actually a bit clumsy to use.


The default style for labels in plots is TraditionalForm, so I'll restrict the style modifications to that particular output form. Here is one way that you could make plot labels appear with the formatting for derivatives that you describe in the question:



Derivative /: 
MakeBoxes[Derivative[\[Alpha]__][f1_][vars__Symbol],
TraditionalForm] := RowBox[
Flatten@{SuperscriptBox[ToBoxes[f1],
RowBox[Flatten@{"[", Riffle[Map[ToBoxes, {\[Alpha]}], ","],
"]"}]], "(", Riffle[Map[ToBoxes, {vars}], ","], ")"}]

Now you should be able to do the following:


Plot[x^2 + x + 1, {x, 0, 1}, PlotLabel -> HoldForm[f'[x]]]


and the plot label will look like this:



$f^{[1]}(x)$



I added some extra logic to the style definition to make it work with higher-order derivatives and many variables, too.


As another example, you would input a mixed higher-order derivative like HoldForm[Derivative[1, 2][f][x, y]] and the display would be



$f^{[1,2]}(x,y)$



This modification will affect the display of all derivatives that were entered using the Derivative keyword when the output format is TraditionalForm. So if you want it to appear that way when TraditionalForm isn't the default, you'll have to wrap the expression in TraditionalForm explicitly. Also note that the TraditionalForm display of the alternative derivative D[f[x],x] is not affected by the new format, whereas f'[x] is. So you can still choose between two different TraditionalForm appearances for derivatives - a nontraditional and a traditional one...



Edit 2


Some additional links:



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...