Skip to main content

graphics - How can I sequentially apply different graph embeddings?


Imagine I have some graph G, and I perform a graph embedding using a command like:


G = Graph[GraphEdges, GraphLayout -> {"SpringElectricalEmbedding"}]

I then want to apply a "GridEmbedding" to the post-Spring/Electrical embedded graph.


How can I do this?


Specifically, I have a graph I know to be a rectangular lattice, but the vertices are at random positions initially. Attempting a direct "GridEmbedding" yields junk; however the "SpringElectricalEmbedding" almost works, but begins to fail around the edges of the graph. Does anyone have advice for dealing with this?


Alternatively, can "GridEmbedding" be made to respect edge lengths / weights akin to what is possible for "SpringElectricalEmbedding"?




Answer



Here's the one way:


g = Graph[RandomSample[EdgeList[GridGraph[{10, 12}]], 218], 
GraphLayout -> {"GridEmbedding", "Dimension" -> {10, 12}}]

enter image description here


Apply SpringElectricalEmbedding to see how it work:


SetProperty[g, GraphLayout -> "SpringElectricalEmbedding"]

enter image description here



Since you know your graph is rectangular, you can pick four corners by checking vertex degree.


In[356]:= corners = VertexList[g, x_ /; VertexDegree[g, x] == 2]
Out[356]= {111, 120, 10, 1}

Get possible tuples of corners:


In[357]:= tuples = Subsets[corners, {2}]
Out[357]= {{111, 120}, {111, 10}, {111, 1}, {120, 10}, {120, 1}, {10, 1}}

Generate shortest path function for further computation:


shortpath = FindShortestPath[g];


By checking lengths of paths between corners, you could find two boundary paths:


In[359]:= bound = shortpath @@@ tuples;
{m, n} = Most[Sort[Union[Length /@ bound]]];
paths = Select[bound, Length[#] == m &]
Out[361]= {{111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120}, {10, 9,
8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1}}

Compute grids of vertex indices:


pairs = If[Length[shortpath[paths[[1, 1]], paths[[2, 1]]]] == n,

Transpose[paths], paths[[1]] = Reverse[paths[[1]]];
Transpose[paths]];
grids = (VertexIndex[g, #] & /@ shortpath[##]) & @@@ pairs;

Compute coordinates using "SpringElectricalEmbedding":


coords = GraphEmbedding[g, "SpringElectricalEmbedding"];

Now straighten coords by the mean of each grid lines:


Table[coords[[i, 2]] = Mean[coords[[i, 2]]];, {i, grids}];
Table[

coords[[i, 1]] = Mean[coords[[i, 1]]];, {i, Transpose[grids]}];

Here's the results:


SetProperty[g, VertexCoordinates -> coords]

enter image description here


You could make function to do all steps:


gridCoordinates[g_] :=
Block[{coords, corners, tuples, shortpath, bound, m, n, paths, pairs,
grids},

coords = GraphEmbedding[g, "SpringElectricalEmbedding"];
corners = VertexList[g, x_ /; VertexDegree[g, x] == 2];
tuples = Subsets[corners, {2}];
shortpath = FindShortestPath[g];
bound = shortpath @@@ tuples;
{m, n} = Most[Sort[Union[Length /@ bound]]];
paths = Select[bound, Length[#] == m &];
pairs = If[Length[shortpath[paths[[1, 1]], paths[[2, 1]]]] == n,
Transpose[paths], paths[[1]] = Reverse[paths[[1]]];
Transpose[paths]];

grids = (VertexIndex[g, #] & /@ shortpath[##]) & @@@ pairs;
Table[coords[[i, 2]] = Mean[coords[[i, 2]]];, {i, grids}];
Table[coords[[i, 1]] = Mean[coords[[i, 1]]];, {i, Transpose[grids]}];
coords
]

Here's the version that generate coordinate on unit grid:


  gridUnitCoordinates[g_] :=
Block[{coords, corners, tuples, shortpath, bound, m, n, paths, pairs,
grids},

corners = VertexList[g, x_ /; VertexDegree[g, x] == 2];
tuples = Subsets[corners, {2}];
shortpath = FindShortestPath[g];
bound = shortpath @@@ tuples;
{m, n} = Most[Sort[Union[Length /@ bound]]];
paths = Select[bound, Length[#] == m &];
pairs = If[Length[shortpath[paths[[1, 1]], paths[[2, 1]]]] == n,
Transpose[paths], paths[[1]] = Reverse[paths[[1]]];
Transpose[paths]];
grids = (VertexIndex[g, #] & /@ shortpath[##]) & @@@ pairs;

{m, n} = Dimensions[grids];
coords = Flatten[Table[{j, i}, {i, m}, {j, n}], 1];
coords[[Ordering[Flatten[grids]]]]
]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Adding a thick curve to a regionplot

Suppose we have the following simple RegionPlot: f[x_] := 1 - x^2 g[x_] := 1 - 0.5 x^2 RegionPlot[{y < f[x], f[x] < y < g[x], y > g[x]}, {x, 0, 2}, {y, 0, 2}] Now I'm trying to change the curve defined by $y=g[x]$ into a thick black curve, while leaving all other boundaries in the plot unchanged. I've tried adding the region $y=g[x]$ and playing with the plotstyle, which didn't work, and I've tried BoundaryStyle, which changed all the boundaries in the plot. Now I'm kinda out of ideas... Any help would be appreciated! Answer With f[x_] := 1 - x^2 g[x_] := 1 - 0.5 x^2 You can use Epilog to add the thick line: RegionPlot[{y < f[x], f[x] < y < g[x], y > g[x]}, {x, 0, 2}, {y, 0, 2}, PlotPoints -> 50, Epilog -> (Plot[g[x], {x, 0, 2}, PlotStyle -> {Black, Thick}][[1]]), PlotStyle -> {Directive[Yellow, Opacity[0.4]], Directive[Pink, Opacity[0.4]],