Skip to main content

formatting - How does MakeBoxes handle an n-ary operator?


I want to format results from Reduce using the $\cup$ symbol instead of the $\lor$ symbol. For example, Reduce[x^2 > 4, x, Reals] produces $x<-2\lor x>2$ while I would like it to produce $x<-2\cup x>2$.


My current solution is to add the head xO to use in place of the Or head and associate the appropriate formatting with the xO head using MakeBoxes.


xO /: MakeBoxes[xO[x_, y_], form_] :=                                                             
RowBox[{MakeBoxes[x, form], "\[Union]", MakeBoxes[y, form]}];


When I want to invoke the special formatting, I simply substitute xO for Or.


Reduce[x^2 > 4, x, Reals] /. Or -> xO

This produces the desired result of $(x<-2)\cup (x>2)$. I am feeling like a master bit-twiddler at this point.


Of course, my next test case didn't work.


Reduce[x^3 + 2 x^2 - x - 2 == 0] /. Or -> xO
(* xO(x==-2,x==-1,x==1) *)

My MakeBoxes[xO[x_, y_]] definition above does not match the case when xO has three arguments. I added the following to limp along a little further.



xO /: MakeBoxes[xO[x_, y_, z_], form_] :=                                                         
RowBox[{MakeBoxes[x, form], "\[Union]", MakeBoxes[y, form], "\[Union]", MakeBoxes[z, form]}];

This works for three arguments, but is clearly not a robust solution. What is the general method for an n-ary function?


I tried several variations of the following:


xO /: MakeBoxes[xO[x_, y__], form_] :=                                                            
RowBox[{MakeBoxes[x, form], "\[Union]", MakeBoxes[y, form]}];

which produced the error:


MakeBoxes::argt: "MakeBoxes called with 3 arguments; 1 or 2 arguments are expected"


when applied to the Reduce[x^3 + 2 x^2 - x - 2 == 0] /. Or -> xO test case.


I am probably missing something obvious. Any ideas?



Answer



You were almost there. You just need to use the multiple-argument pattern, and generalize your code accordingly to create the internals of RowBox programmatically:


xO /: MakeBoxes[xO[x___], form_] :=
RowBox[
Riffle[
Map[MakeBoxes[#, form] &, {x}],
"\[Union]"

]
]

Note however that the above implementation leaks evaluation. It may or may not be a problem, but for example here:


x = 1;
xO[x == 1, x > 1, x < 1]

one may argue that the desired result should not be sensitive to the possible global values that x may have, so the result:


(* True \[Union] False \[Union] False *)


may be unsatisfacory. Thus, here is a more careful version:


ClearAll[xO];
SetAttributes[xO, HoldAllComplete];
xO /: MakeBoxes[xO[x___], form_] :=
RowBox@Riffle[
List @@ Replace[
HoldComplete[x],
elem_ :> With[{eval = MakeBoxes[elem, form]}, eval /; True],
{1}
],

"\[Union]"
]

which now gives


xO[x == 1, x > 1, x < 1]

(* x == 1 \[Union] x > 1 \[Union] x < 1 *)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...