Skip to main content

simplifying expressions - Eliminate a variable from a differential equation and an algebra equation then collect the remaining variables


Recently, I am attempting to eliminate a variable from a differential equation (DE) and an algebra equation (AE), then collect the remaining variables as a new (grand) parameter. Actually, I have worked on this problem more than one week. Due to my incompetence, today I seek someone's help on this forum. To show this idea, this is a working example:


Implement the following code step by step:


eq1 = h'[t] == Log[(1 - xi)/(1 - x0)];
eq2 = h[t] == (xw - xi)/(-(1 - xw)*Log[(1 - xi)/(1 - x0)]);
Eliminate[{eq1, eq2}, xi] // FullSimplify

Then I get a DE



E^Derivative[1][h][ t] + ((-1 + xw) (-1 + h[t] Derivative[1][h][t]))/(-1 + x0) == 0




Next, I want to replace the remaining variables $\frac{1-x0}{1-xw}$ by a new parameter $c$, in other word, the desired DE is $e^{h'[t]}-\frac{1}{c}(1-h[t]h'[t])=0$, which is a preferred form for parameter study. So I tried


%/. (1 - x0)/(1 - xw) -> c

unfortunately, this replacement does not work, which follows my first question: how to replace a combination of variable by a parameter. This question appears to be silly, someone may say that why not replace it manually? The reason is in some more complicated equation a number of parameters are often distributed, so it is not easy to combine them manually. You have gotten my point:)


This is my full problem:


First, parameter $\Xi$ consists of known parameters


Ξ = (EE*((1 + B KK) Sqrt[M] Log[(1 - x0)/(1 - xw)] - 
B Δ Subscript[Θ, ∞])^2)/(\
Δ^2*(Γ*(1 - xw)*(Log[(1 - x0)/(1 - xw)] -

Δ/Sqrt[M]*B*Subscript[Θ, ∞]) -
KK*B*Subscript[Θ, ∞]));

Second, function $g_1$ and $g_2$ contain unknown variable $xi$


g1 = ((Δ*Γ*(xi - xw) + KK*Sqrt[M]*
Log[(1 - x0)/(1 - xi)])*(Subscript[Θ, ∞] -
\Γ*(xi - xw)))/((Subscript[Θ, ∞] -
\Γ*(xi - xw))*Δ*B -
Sqrt[M]*(1 + KK*B)*Log[(1 - x0)/(1 - xi)]);


g2 = ((Δ*Γ*(xi - xw) +
KK*Sqrt[M]*Log[(1 - x0)/(1 - xi)])*(1 + KK*B))/(Δ*
B*(Subscript[Θ, ∞] -
Γ*(xi - xw)) - (1 + KK*B)*Sqrt[M]*Log[(1 - x0)/(1 - xi)]);

Third, DE and AE for $H[T]$:


eq1 = H'[T] == 1/Ξ*(EE*(Γ*(xi-xw)-B*g1))/(KK + g2);

eq2 = H[T] == (Δ*Γ*(xi - xw) +
KK*Sqrt[M]*Log[(1 - x0)/(1 - xi)])/(Δ*

B*(Subscript[Θ, ∞] -
Γ*(xi-xw)) -Sqrt[M]*(1 + KK*B)*Log[(1 - x0)/(1 - xi)]);

Fourth, eliminate $xi$:


Eliminate[{eq1, eq2}, xi]

Note from which my second question arises: how to speed up the long-time running of Mathematica?


Finally, the last question is how to combine those parameter(known) in the above resulting differential equation into the following two new (grand) parameters:


Σ = ((Δ*Γ*Sqrt[M]*(1 - xw) -
KK*M*(1 + B KK) )*Log[(1 - x0)/(1 - xw)]^2)/((1 + B KK) Sqrt[M]*

Log[(1 - x0)/(1 - xw)] -
B Δ Subscript[Θ, ∞])^2;

and


Π = (Δ^2*B*
Subscript[Θ, ∞]*Γ*(1 - xw)*
Log[(1 - x0)/(1 - xw)])/((1 + B KK) Sqrt[M] Log[(1 - x0)/(1 - xw)] -
B Δ Subscript[Θ, ∞])^2;

Some Hints: the final DE might contain the following terms $H[T]$, $H'[T]$, $\Sigma$, $\Pi$, and the exponential function.



I am so sorry for the complicated expressions. And many thanks for your time!




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...