Skip to main content

simplifying expressions - Eliminate a variable from a differential equation and an algebra equation then collect the remaining variables


Recently, I am attempting to eliminate a variable from a differential equation (DE) and an algebra equation (AE), then collect the remaining variables as a new (grand) parameter. Actually, I have worked on this problem more than one week. Due to my incompetence, today I seek someone's help on this forum. To show this idea, this is a working example:


Implement the following code step by step:


eq1 = h'[t] == Log[(1 - xi)/(1 - x0)];
eq2 = h[t] == (xw - xi)/(-(1 - xw)*Log[(1 - xi)/(1 - x0)]);
Eliminate[{eq1, eq2}, xi] // FullSimplify

Then I get a DE



E^Derivative[1][h][ t] + ((-1 + xw) (-1 + h[t] Derivative[1][h][t]))/(-1 + x0) == 0




Next, I want to replace the remaining variables $\frac{1-x0}{1-xw}$ by a new parameter $c$, in other word, the desired DE is $e^{h'[t]}-\frac{1}{c}(1-h[t]h'[t])=0$, which is a preferred form for parameter study. So I tried


%/. (1 - x0)/(1 - xw) -> c

unfortunately, this replacement does not work, which follows my first question: how to replace a combination of variable by a parameter. This question appears to be silly, someone may say that why not replace it manually? The reason is in some more complicated equation a number of parameters are often distributed, so it is not easy to combine them manually. You have gotten my point:)


This is my full problem:


First, parameter $\Xi$ consists of known parameters


Ξ = (EE*((1 + B KK) Sqrt[M] Log[(1 - x0)/(1 - xw)] - 
B Δ Subscript[Θ, ∞])^2)/(\
Δ^2*(Γ*(1 - xw)*(Log[(1 - x0)/(1 - xw)] -

Δ/Sqrt[M]*B*Subscript[Θ, ∞]) -
KK*B*Subscript[Θ, ∞]));

Second, function $g_1$ and $g_2$ contain unknown variable $xi$


g1 = ((Δ*Γ*(xi - xw) + KK*Sqrt[M]*
Log[(1 - x0)/(1 - xi)])*(Subscript[Θ, ∞] -
\Γ*(xi - xw)))/((Subscript[Θ, ∞] -
\Γ*(xi - xw))*Δ*B -
Sqrt[M]*(1 + KK*B)*Log[(1 - x0)/(1 - xi)]);


g2 = ((Δ*Γ*(xi - xw) +
KK*Sqrt[M]*Log[(1 - x0)/(1 - xi)])*(1 + KK*B))/(Δ*
B*(Subscript[Θ, ∞] -
Γ*(xi - xw)) - (1 + KK*B)*Sqrt[M]*Log[(1 - x0)/(1 - xi)]);

Third, DE and AE for $H[T]$:


eq1 = H'[T] == 1/Ξ*(EE*(Γ*(xi-xw)-B*g1))/(KK + g2);

eq2 = H[T] == (Δ*Γ*(xi - xw) +
KK*Sqrt[M]*Log[(1 - x0)/(1 - xi)])/(Δ*

B*(Subscript[Θ, ∞] -
Γ*(xi-xw)) -Sqrt[M]*(1 + KK*B)*Log[(1 - x0)/(1 - xi)]);

Fourth, eliminate $xi$:


Eliminate[{eq1, eq2}, xi]

Note from which my second question arises: how to speed up the long-time running of Mathematica?


Finally, the last question is how to combine those parameter(known) in the above resulting differential equation into the following two new (grand) parameters:


Σ = ((Δ*Γ*Sqrt[M]*(1 - xw) -
KK*M*(1 + B KK) )*Log[(1 - x0)/(1 - xw)]^2)/((1 + B KK) Sqrt[M]*

Log[(1 - x0)/(1 - xw)] -
B Δ Subscript[Θ, ∞])^2;

and


Π = (Δ^2*B*
Subscript[Θ, ∞]*Γ*(1 - xw)*
Log[(1 - x0)/(1 - xw)])/((1 + B KK) Sqrt[M] Log[(1 - x0)/(1 - xw)] -
B Δ Subscript[Θ, ∞])^2;

Some Hints: the final DE might contain the following terms $H[T]$, $H'[T]$, $\Sigma$, $\Pi$, and the exponential function.



I am so sorry for the complicated expressions. And many thanks for your time!




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...