Skip to main content

graphics - Character edge finding


The following line of code finds the edge of a character:


pic = Binarize[GradientFilter[Rasterize[Style["\[Euro]", FontFamily -> "Times"], 
                              ImageSize -> 200] // Image, 1]]

Mathematica graphics


The coordinates of the edges can be found as follows:


pdata = Position[ImageData[pic], 1];

Test:



Graphics[Point[pdata]]

Mathematica graphics


However, the points are not sorted in an order usable by Line or Polygon:


Graphics[Polygon[pdata]]

Mathematica graphics


This brings me to my question:



  • What would be an efficient method to sort the coordinates so that it would plot properly with Line or Polygon?



Additionally,



  • How to thin and smooth the set of points?

  • How to deal with characters with holes in them, like the ones below?


Mathematica graphics or Mathematica graphics



Answer



I think there is a neat solution. We have curios function ListCurvePathPlot:


pic = Thinning@Binarize[GradientFilter[Rasterize[Style["\[Euro]", 

FontFamily -> "Times"], ImageSize -> 200] // Image, 1]];

pdata = Position[ImageData[pic], 1];

lcp = ListCurvePathPlot[pdata]

enter image description here


Now this is of course Graphics containing Line with set of points


lcp[[1, 1, 3, 2]]


enter image description here


So of course we can do something like


Graphics3D[Table[{Orange, Opacity[.5],Polygon[(#~Join~{10 n})&
/@ lcp[[1, 1, 3, 2, 1]]]}, {n, 10}], Boxed -> False]

enter image description here


I think it works nicely with "8" and Polygon:


pic = Thinning@Binarize[GradientFilter[
Rasterize[Style["8", FontFamily -> "Times"], ImageSize -> 500] //Image, 1]]; 
pdata = Position[ImageData[pic], 1]; lcp = ListCurvePathPlot[pdata]


enter image description here


And you can do polygons 1-by-1 extraction:


Graphics3D[{{Orange, Thick, Polygon[(#~Join~{0}) & /@ lcp[[1, 1, 3, 2, 1]]]},
  {Red, Thick, Polygon[(#~Join~{1}) & /@ lcp[[1, 1, 3, 3, 1]]]},
  {Blue, Thick, Polygon[(#~Join~{200}) & /@ lcp[[1, 1, 3, 4, 1]]]}}]

enter image description here


=> To smooth the curve set ImageSize -> "larger number" in your pic = code.


=> To thin the curve to 1 pixel wide use Thinning:



 Row@{Thinning[#], Identity[#]} &@Binarize[GradientFilter[
 Rasterize[Style["\[Euro]", FontFamily -> "Times"], 
 ImageSize -> 200] // Image, 1]]

enter image description here


You can do curve extraction more efficiently with Mathematica. A simple example would be


text = First[
   First[ImportString[
     ExportString[
      Style["\[Euro] 9 M-8 ", Italic, FontSize -> 24, 

       FontFamily -> "Times"], "PDF"], "PDF", 
     "TextMode" -> "Outlines"]]];

Graphics[{EdgeForm[Black], FaceForm[], text}]

enter image description here


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...
Post a Comment
Read more

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...
Post a Comment
Read more