Skip to main content

plotting - GeoProjection for astronomical data - wrong ticks


Here is an excellent answer to what I wanted to do, and it works like a charm. Unfortunately, when I want to change it a bit, it fails. For setting the stage, here is the datafile, and this is my initialization code:



import = Drop[Import["Fermi2", "Table"], 1];

ra = Table[(Take[import[[i]], {2, 4}][[1]] +
Take[import[[i]], {2, 4}][[2]]/60. +
Take[import[[i]], {2, 4}][[3]]/3600.)/24 360, {i, 1,
Length[import]}];

dec = Table[Sign[Take[import[[i]], {5, 7}][[
1]]] (Abs[Take[import[[i]], {5, 7}][[1]]] +
Take[import[[i]], {5, 7}][[2]]/60. +

Take[import[[i]], {5, 7}][[3]]/3600.), {i, 1, Length[import]}];

data = Transpose[{dec, ra}];

Then I use the following code to produce a projection of the points onto the sky:


GeoGraphics[{Black, Point@GeoPosition@data}, 
GeoRange -> {All, {0, 360}}, PlotRangePadding -> Scaled@.01,
GeoGridLinesStyle -> Directive[Black, Dashed],
GeoProjection -> "Sinusoidal", GeoGridLines -> Automatic,
GeoBackground -> White, Frame -> True,

ImagePadding -> {{60, 40}, {40, 15}}, ImageSize -> 800,
FrameTicks -> {Table[{N[i Degree], Row[{i/15 + 12, " h"}]}, {i, -180, 180, 30}],
Table[{N[i Degree], Row[{i, " \[Degree]"}]}, {i, -90, 90, 30}]},
Background -> White, FrameStyle -> Black, TicksStyle -> 15,
FrameLabel -> {{"DEC", None}, {"RA", None}}]

which produces the following image:


enter image description here


Looks perfect. Next, I simply changed Sinusoidal to Mollweide in the above code, and got the following image:


enter image description here



This, contrary to the previous case, places the ticks in wrong places: they do not correspond anymore to the dashed grid lines on the projection.


So, my question is: how to fix this so the ticks are at the right places?


EDIT: Inspired by this post I found out that the Hammer projection suffers the same issue as the Mollweide projection, but Aitoff (very similar to Hammer) works as fine as the Sinusoidal projection.



Answer



I'm sorry for a delay.


The cause of this problem originates from my thoughtless approach and/or abuse of specific case of a Sinusoidal projection.


I was using n Degree to specify ticks position. It was working so I wrongly assumed it gets positions in projection automatically. As we can see, it's not the case.


Answer: we have to project ticks positions too.


getLat = GeoGridPosition[GeoPosition[{#, 0.}], #2][[1, 2]] &
getLon = GeoGridPosition[GeoPosition[{0., #}], #2][[1, 1]] &



With[{
tickSpec = {
Table[{getLon[i, #], Row[{i/15 + 12, " h"}]}, {i, -180, 180, 30}],
Table[{getLat[i, #], Row[{i, " \[Degree]"}]}, {i, -90, 90, 15}]}
},
GeoGraphics[{},
GeoRange -> {All, {0, 360}},
PlotRangePadding -> Scaled@.01,

GeoGridLinesStyle -> Directive[Red, Thick],
GeoProjection -> #,
GeoGridLines -> Automatic,

GeoBackground -> White,
Frame -> True,
ImagePadding -> {{60, 40}, {40, 15}},
ImageSize -> 800,
GridLinesStyle -> Directive[Blue, Thick, Dashing[.01]],
Method -> "GridLinesInFront" -> True,

GridLines -> tickSpec[[;; , ;; , 1]],
FrameTicks -> tickSpec,
Background -> White,
FrameStyle -> Black,
TicksStyle -> 15,
FrameLabel -> {{"DEC", None}, {"RA", None}}
]
] & /@ {"Sinusoidal", "Mollweide", "Bonne"} // Column

enter image description here



Outer longitude ticks in Bonne projection are positioned quite densely. It's expected due to the fact that the equator is curved a lot. One can put ticks that are refering to other parallel, just change 0s in getLong.


Like so:


getLat = GeoGridPosition[GeoPosition[{#, 0.}], #2][[1, 2]] &
getLon = GeoGridPosition[GeoPosition[{-30, #}], #2][[1, 1]] &


With[{tickSpec = {
Table[{getLon[i, #], Row[{i/15 + 12, " h"}]}, {i, -180, 180, 30}],
Table[{getLat[i, #], Row[{i, " \[Degree]"}]}, {i, -90, 90, 30}]}}
,

GeoGraphics[
{Orange, AbsolutePointSize@12,
Point@Table[GeoPosition[{-30, i}], {i, 0, 360, 30}],
Point@Table[GeoPosition[{i, 180}], {i, -90, 90, 30}]
}
,
GeoRange -> {All, {0, 360}},
PlotRangePadding -> Scaled@.01,
GeoGridLinesStyle -> Directive[Lighter@Red],
GeoProjection -> #,

GeoGridLines -> {
Prepend[{-30, Directive[Green, Thick]}] @ Table[i, {i, -90, 90, 30}],
Prepend[{180, Directive[Green, Thick]}] @ Table[i, {i, 0, 360, 30}]
},
GeoBackground -> White,
Frame -> True,
ImagePadding -> {{60, 40}, {40, 15}},
ImageSize -> 800,
GridLinesStyle -> Directive[Blue, Dashing[.01]],
Method -> "GridLinesInFront" -> True,

GridLines -> tickSpec[[;; , ;; , 1]],
FrameTicks -> tickSpec,
Background -> White,
FrameStyle -> Black,
TicksStyle -> 15,
FrameLabel -> {{"DEC", None}, {"RA", None}}]
] &["Bonne"]

enter image description here


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

calculus and analysis - Integral of the Sinc product

Let us consider the following integral $$ B_n = \int_0^\infty \prod_{k=1,3,5,\dots}^n\frac{\sin (x/k)}{x/k}dx $$ By definition, Sinc[x] == Sin[x]/x , therefore B[n_?OddQ] := Integrate[Product[Sinc[x/k], {k, 1, n, 2}], {x, 0, Infinity}] B /@ Range[1, 13, 2] {Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2} OK, everything is fine. But... B[15] 467807924713440738696537864469 Pi/935615849440640907310521750000 What's going on? Answer As Eckhard wrote in comments B[n] is the n-th Borwein integral . (The letter B was not accidental :) ) This funny properties of Borwein integrals is related to the Fourier transform of Sinc function FourierTransform[Sinc[x], x, k] 1/2 Sqrt[Pi/2] (Sign[1 - k] + Sign[1 + k]) Plot[%, {k, -2, 2}, Filling -> 0] which is the box function. The result is $\pi/2$ while the sum $$ 1/3+1/5+\dots+1/n $$ B_n = \frac{\pi}{2} - \pi \bigg(\sum_{k=3,5,\ldots}^n\frac{1}{k} -1\biggr)^\frac{n-1}{2}\prod_{k=3,5,\dots}^n\frac{k}{k-1}. $$ For $n=15$ it is equal to $$ \frac{46780...

list manipulation - Selecting multiple columns from a matrix?

Sample data: data = { {{2013, 1, 1}, 24.13, 167.67, 231.82}, {{2013, 1, 2}, 32.15, 170.92, 225.99}, {{2013, 1, 3}, 35.43, 172.68, 221.67}, {{2013, 1, 4}, 36.73, 173.05, 218.32}, {{2013, 1, 5}, 58.19, 165.96, 197.05}, {{2013, 1, 6}, 69.99, 163.50, 187.52}, {{2013, 1, 7}, 71.37, 154.21, 175.58}, {{2013, 1, 8}, 72.51, 149.66, 163.25}}; I want a DateListPlot with three graphs, so for a matrix formed by columns 1 and 2, one for columns 1 and 3, and 1 for columns 1 and 4. At the moment I'm using this code: data2 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 2]]}]; data3 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 3]]}]; data4 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 4]]}]; DateListPlot[{data2, data3, data4}, Joined -> True, Filling -> {3 -> {1}}] but I have a hunch that this can be done more efficiently. I don't like the Transpose s in particular. Any ideas? edit (for extra credit) What if I need to multiply the second column by 2, which in my solution is simp...