Skip to main content

plotting - GeoProjection for astronomical data - wrong ticks


Here is an excellent answer to what I wanted to do, and it works like a charm. Unfortunately, when I want to change it a bit, it fails. For setting the stage, here is the datafile, and this is my initialization code:



import = Drop[Import["Fermi2", "Table"], 1];

ra = Table[(Take[import[[i]], {2, 4}][[1]] +
Take[import[[i]], {2, 4}][[2]]/60. +
Take[import[[i]], {2, 4}][[3]]/3600.)/24 360, {i, 1,
Length[import]}];

dec = Table[Sign[Take[import[[i]], {5, 7}][[
1]]] (Abs[Take[import[[i]], {5, 7}][[1]]] +
Take[import[[i]], {5, 7}][[2]]/60. +

Take[import[[i]], {5, 7}][[3]]/3600.), {i, 1, Length[import]}];

data = Transpose[{dec, ra}];

Then I use the following code to produce a projection of the points onto the sky:


GeoGraphics[{Black, Point@GeoPosition@data}, 
GeoRange -> {All, {0, 360}}, PlotRangePadding -> Scaled@.01,
GeoGridLinesStyle -> Directive[Black, Dashed],
GeoProjection -> "Sinusoidal", GeoGridLines -> Automatic,
GeoBackground -> White, Frame -> True,

ImagePadding -> {{60, 40}, {40, 15}}, ImageSize -> 800,
FrameTicks -> {Table[{N[i Degree], Row[{i/15 + 12, " h"}]}, {i, -180, 180, 30}],
Table[{N[i Degree], Row[{i, " \[Degree]"}]}, {i, -90, 90, 30}]},
Background -> White, FrameStyle -> Black, TicksStyle -> 15,
FrameLabel -> {{"DEC", None}, {"RA", None}}]

which produces the following image:


enter image description here


Looks perfect. Next, I simply changed Sinusoidal to Mollweide in the above code, and got the following image:


enter image description here



This, contrary to the previous case, places the ticks in wrong places: they do not correspond anymore to the dashed grid lines on the projection.


So, my question is: how to fix this so the ticks are at the right places?


EDIT: Inspired by this post I found out that the Hammer projection suffers the same issue as the Mollweide projection, but Aitoff (very similar to Hammer) works as fine as the Sinusoidal projection.



Answer



I'm sorry for a delay.


The cause of this problem originates from my thoughtless approach and/or abuse of specific case of a Sinusoidal projection.


I was using n Degree to specify ticks position. It was working so I wrongly assumed it gets positions in projection automatically. As we can see, it's not the case.


Answer: we have to project ticks positions too.


getLat = GeoGridPosition[GeoPosition[{#, 0.}], #2][[1, 2]] &
getLon = GeoGridPosition[GeoPosition[{0., #}], #2][[1, 1]] &



With[{
tickSpec = {
Table[{getLon[i, #], Row[{i/15 + 12, " h"}]}, {i, -180, 180, 30}],
Table[{getLat[i, #], Row[{i, " \[Degree]"}]}, {i, -90, 90, 15}]}
},
GeoGraphics[{},
GeoRange -> {All, {0, 360}},
PlotRangePadding -> Scaled@.01,

GeoGridLinesStyle -> Directive[Red, Thick],
GeoProjection -> #,
GeoGridLines -> Automatic,

GeoBackground -> White,
Frame -> True,
ImagePadding -> {{60, 40}, {40, 15}},
ImageSize -> 800,
GridLinesStyle -> Directive[Blue, Thick, Dashing[.01]],
Method -> "GridLinesInFront" -> True,

GridLines -> tickSpec[[;; , ;; , 1]],
FrameTicks -> tickSpec,
Background -> White,
FrameStyle -> Black,
TicksStyle -> 15,
FrameLabel -> {{"DEC", None}, {"RA", None}}
]
] & /@ {"Sinusoidal", "Mollweide", "Bonne"} // Column

enter image description here



Outer longitude ticks in Bonne projection are positioned quite densely. It's expected due to the fact that the equator is curved a lot. One can put ticks that are refering to other parallel, just change 0s in getLong.


Like so:


getLat = GeoGridPosition[GeoPosition[{#, 0.}], #2][[1, 2]] &
getLon = GeoGridPosition[GeoPosition[{-30, #}], #2][[1, 1]] &


With[{tickSpec = {
Table[{getLon[i, #], Row[{i/15 + 12, " h"}]}, {i, -180, 180, 30}],
Table[{getLat[i, #], Row[{i, " \[Degree]"}]}, {i, -90, 90, 30}]}}
,

GeoGraphics[
{Orange, AbsolutePointSize@12,
Point@Table[GeoPosition[{-30, i}], {i, 0, 360, 30}],
Point@Table[GeoPosition[{i, 180}], {i, -90, 90, 30}]
}
,
GeoRange -> {All, {0, 360}},
PlotRangePadding -> Scaled@.01,
GeoGridLinesStyle -> Directive[Lighter@Red],
GeoProjection -> #,

GeoGridLines -> {
Prepend[{-30, Directive[Green, Thick]}] @ Table[i, {i, -90, 90, 30}],
Prepend[{180, Directive[Green, Thick]}] @ Table[i, {i, 0, 360, 30}]
},
GeoBackground -> White,
Frame -> True,
ImagePadding -> {{60, 40}, {40, 15}},
ImageSize -> 800,
GridLinesStyle -> Directive[Blue, Dashing[.01]],
Method -> "GridLinesInFront" -> True,

GridLines -> tickSpec[[;; , ;; , 1]],
FrameTicks -> tickSpec,
Background -> White,
FrameStyle -> Black,
TicksStyle -> 15,
FrameLabel -> {{"DEC", None}, {"RA", None}}]
] &["Bonne"]

enter image description here


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....