Skip to main content

list manipulation - Convert frequency counts to long notation in Mathematica


I have a series of frequencies of values, e.g. 5 times 1, 10 times 2 and 5 times 3, as in


list={{1,5},{2,10},{3,5}}


and I would like to convert this to long notation as in


list2={1,1,1,1,1,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,3,3,3,3,3}

what is the most elegant way to do this in Mathematica?



Answer



I added timings - 3rd from the bottom is fastest. I am sure there are faster versions. If speed is important you can parallelize or come up with a Compile-ed solution.


In[1]:= list = RandomInteger[{3, 12}, {10^7, 2}];

In[2]:= list // Developer`PackedArrayQ

Out[2]= True

In[3]:= Table[#1, {#2}] & @@@ list // Flatten; // AbsoluteTiming
Out[3]= {22.015290, Null}

In[4]:= Join @@ (Table[#1, {#2}] & @@@ list); // AbsoluteTiming
Out[4]= {18.528328, Null}

In[13]:= Join @@ ConstantArray @@@ list; // AbsoluteTiming
Out[13]= {18.261945, Null}


In[5]:= ConstantArray[#1, #2] & @@@ list // Flatten; // AbsoluteTiming
Out[5]= {43.177745, Null}

In[6]:= NestList[# &, #1, #2 - 1] & @@@ list // Flatten; // AbsoluteTiming
Out[6]= {30.278883, Null}

In[7]:= Join @@MapThread[ConstantArray, Thread[list]]; // AbsoluteTiming
Out[7]= {15.465663, Null}


In[8]:= Flatten@ MapThread[ConstantArray, Thread[list]]; // AbsoluteTiming
Out[8]= {40.184748, Null}

In[9]:= Join @@ MapThread[Table[#1, {#2}] &, Thread[list]]; // AbsoluteTiming
Out[9]= {18.716637, Null}

In[3]:= Inner[ConstantArray, Sequence @@ Transpose@list, Join]; // AbsoluteTiming
Out[3]= {16.525300, Null}

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...