Skip to main content

differential geometry - How to calculate scalar curvature Ricci tensor and Christoffel symbols in Mathematica?


I am seeking a convenient and effective way to calculate such geometric quantities. I've used packages like TensoriaCalc, but they don't work at all time. Sometimes, I run into the following error:



Symbol Tensor is Protected.
Symbol TensorType is Protected.
Symbol TensorName is Protected.



Here is the code I'm using:


Clear [i, j, φ, τ, σ] 
q["case"] = Metric[ SubMinus[i], SubMinus[j],

E^(2 φ[σ]) (\[DifferentialD]τ^2 + \[DifferentialD] σ^2),
CoordinateSystem -> {τ, σ}, TensorName -> "T", StartIndex -> 1 ]

I think the above is correct, since I merely modified the example from the package manual. It gives me the correct answer sometimes (if I only use one notebook).


Also, I ran the codes from the chapter "General Relativity" in the book "Mathmatica for theoretical physics" by Gerd Baumann, but none of them work


Is there more efficient way to calculate them? Please give me some suggestions about this.



Answer



I stumbled upon this question via Google. Thanks for using my TensoriaCalc package!


My response is probably too late, but I believe the problem you cited




Symbol Tensor is Protected.
Symbol TensorType is Protected.
Symbol TensorName is Protected.



is because you loaded TensoriaCalc more than once in the same kernel session.


When writing the package, I had to Protect all the symbols used in the package, such as Tensor, Metric, etc. This means their definitions cannot be altered by an external user, as otherwise, it will create inconsistencies. This is why loading TensoriaCalc more than once gives an error, because you are essentially trying to define these symbols yet again.


Hope this helps.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...