Skip to main content

animation - Simulation of a Camshaft


This is a new question which I will reuse the codes of a previous question (When to use GeometricTransformation or Rotate) that belongs to me.


I am doing this way because these questions have different goals and I am progressing this way.


With the help of the user Sjoerd C. de Vries I learned how to rotate an object graph that I am calling of cam.


Now I came across another problem. How to make my valve stays tangent in the whole course of the cam?


Here is a link to what I'm trying to show: CamShaft


My code:



r1 = 15; r2 = 8; c = 50; γ = ArcSin[(r1 - r2)/c] // N;

l1 = (2 γ + π) r1;
l2 = (π - 2 γ) r2;
l3 = 2 c Cos[γ];
L = 2 c Cos[γ] + (2 γ + π) r1 + (π -
2 γ) r2;

cam = {Circle[{0, 0}, r1, {Pi/2 - γ, ((3*Pi))/2 + γ}],
Circle[{c, 0}, r2, {Pi/2 - γ, -(Pi/2) + γ}],

Line[{{Cos[Pi/2 - γ]*r1,
Sin[Pi/2 - γ]*r1}, {Cos[Pi/2 - γ]*r2 + c,
Sin[Pi/2 - γ]*r2}}],
Line[{{Cos[((3*Pi))/2 + γ]*r1,
Sin[((3*Pi))/2 + γ]*r1}, {Cos[-(Pi/2) + γ]*r2 + c,
Sin[-(Pi/2) + γ]*r2}}], PointSize[0.03], Point[{0, 0}]};

g = Graphics[cam];

valve = Graphics[

{
Red,
Thickness[0.008],
Circle[{0, posição = 15 + rValve}, rValve = 4, {0, -Pi}],
Line[{{-rValve, posição}, {-rValve, posição + 20}}],
Line[{{rValve, posição}, {rValve, posição + 20}}],
Line[{{-rValve, posição + 20}, {rValve, posição + 20}}]
}
];


Show[g, valve]

enter image description here


The code is represented an initial position of my study because I cannot develop the next steps.


I do not know how to make the valve tap the cam throughout the course.




Answer



RegionDistance can be useful here.


cambd = RegionUnion[
Circle[{0, 0}, r1, {Pi/2 - γ, ((3*Pi))/2 + γ}],

Circle[{c, 0}, r2, {-(Pi/2) + γ, Pi/2 - γ}],
Line[{{Cos[Pi/2 - γ]*r1, Sin[Pi/2 - γ]*r1}, {Cos[Pi/2 - γ]*r2 + c, Sin[Pi/2 - γ]*r2}}],
Line[{{Cos[((3*Pi))/2 + γ]*r1, Sin[((3*Pi))/2 + γ]*r1}, {Cos[-(Pi/2) + γ]*r2 + c, Sin[-(Pi/2) + γ]*r2}}]
];

posiçãoVal[α_?NumericQ] :=
With[{cambdα = TransformedRegion[cambd, RotationTransform[α]]},
y /. Quiet[FindRoot[RegionDistance[cambdα, {0, y}] == rValve, {y, 60}]]
]


Table[posiçãoVal[α], {α, 0, 2π - π/6, π/6}]


{19., 20.4853, 30.8282, 62., 30.8282, 20.4853, 19., 19., 19., 19., 19., 19.}

frames = Table[
Graphics[{
GeometricTransformation[cam, RotationMatrix[α]],
posição = posiçãoVal[α];
{Red, Thickness[0.008],

Circle[{0, posição}, rValve = 4, {-Pi, 0}],
Line[{{-rValve, posição}, {-rValve, posição + 20}}],
Line[{{rValve, posição}, {rValve, posição + 20}}],
Line[{{-rValve, posição + 20}, {rValve, posição + 20}}]}
},
PlotRange -> {{-59, 59}, {-59, 83}}
],
{α, 0, 2π - π/12, π/12}
];


Export["Desktop/cam.gif", frames];

enter image description here


Here's a plot of the valve height relative to the cam center point:


Plot[posiçãoVal[α], {α, 0, 2π}, PlotRange -> {15, 66}]

enter image description here


In polar coordinates, we can see we're indeed tracing the isocurve of distance 4 from the cam:


Show[
PolarPlot[posiçãoVal[α+π/2], {α, 0, 2π}, PolarAxes -> {True, False}, PolarTicks -> {"Degrees", Automatic}],

Graphics[{Red, Thick, cam}]
]

enter image description here


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....