Skip to main content

animation - Simulation of a Camshaft


This is a new question which I will reuse the codes of a previous question (When to use GeometricTransformation or Rotate) that belongs to me.


I am doing this way because these questions have different goals and I am progressing this way.


With the help of the user Sjoerd C. de Vries I learned how to rotate an object graph that I am calling of cam.


Now I came across another problem. How to make my valve stays tangent in the whole course of the cam?


Here is a link to what I'm trying to show: CamShaft


My code:



r1 = 15; r2 = 8; c = 50; γ = ArcSin[(r1 - r2)/c] // N;

l1 = (2 γ + π) r1;
l2 = (π - 2 γ) r2;
l3 = 2 c Cos[γ];
L = 2 c Cos[γ] + (2 γ + π) r1 + (π -
2 γ) r2;

cam = {Circle[{0, 0}, r1, {Pi/2 - γ, ((3*Pi))/2 + γ}],
Circle[{c, 0}, r2, {Pi/2 - γ, -(Pi/2) + γ}],

Line[{{Cos[Pi/2 - γ]*r1,
Sin[Pi/2 - γ]*r1}, {Cos[Pi/2 - γ]*r2 + c,
Sin[Pi/2 - γ]*r2}}],
Line[{{Cos[((3*Pi))/2 + γ]*r1,
Sin[((3*Pi))/2 + γ]*r1}, {Cos[-(Pi/2) + γ]*r2 + c,
Sin[-(Pi/2) + γ]*r2}}], PointSize[0.03], Point[{0, 0}]};

g = Graphics[cam];

valve = Graphics[

{
Red,
Thickness[0.008],
Circle[{0, posição = 15 + rValve}, rValve = 4, {0, -Pi}],
Line[{{-rValve, posição}, {-rValve, posição + 20}}],
Line[{{rValve, posição}, {rValve, posição + 20}}],
Line[{{-rValve, posição + 20}, {rValve, posição + 20}}]
}
];


Show[g, valve]

enter image description here


The code is represented an initial position of my study because I cannot develop the next steps.


I do not know how to make the valve tap the cam throughout the course.




Answer



RegionDistance can be useful here.


cambd = RegionUnion[
Circle[{0, 0}, r1, {Pi/2 - γ, ((3*Pi))/2 + γ}],

Circle[{c, 0}, r2, {-(Pi/2) + γ, Pi/2 - γ}],
Line[{{Cos[Pi/2 - γ]*r1, Sin[Pi/2 - γ]*r1}, {Cos[Pi/2 - γ]*r2 + c, Sin[Pi/2 - γ]*r2}}],
Line[{{Cos[((3*Pi))/2 + γ]*r1, Sin[((3*Pi))/2 + γ]*r1}, {Cos[-(Pi/2) + γ]*r2 + c, Sin[-(Pi/2) + γ]*r2}}]
];

posiçãoVal[α_?NumericQ] :=
With[{cambdα = TransformedRegion[cambd, RotationTransform[α]]},
y /. Quiet[FindRoot[RegionDistance[cambdα, {0, y}] == rValve, {y, 60}]]
]


Table[posiçãoVal[α], {α, 0, 2π - π/6, π/6}]


{19., 20.4853, 30.8282, 62., 30.8282, 20.4853, 19., 19., 19., 19., 19., 19.}

frames = Table[
Graphics[{
GeometricTransformation[cam, RotationMatrix[α]],
posição = posiçãoVal[α];
{Red, Thickness[0.008],

Circle[{0, posição}, rValve = 4, {-Pi, 0}],
Line[{{-rValve, posição}, {-rValve, posição + 20}}],
Line[{{rValve, posição}, {rValve, posição + 20}}],
Line[{{-rValve, posição + 20}, {rValve, posição + 20}}]}
},
PlotRange -> {{-59, 59}, {-59, 83}}
],
{α, 0, 2π - π/12, π/12}
];


Export["Desktop/cam.gif", frames];

enter image description here


Here's a plot of the valve height relative to the cam center point:


Plot[posiçãoVal[α], {α, 0, 2π}, PlotRange -> {15, 66}]

enter image description here


In polar coordinates, we can see we're indeed tracing the isocurve of distance 4 from the cam:


Show[
PolarPlot[posiçãoVal[α+π/2], {α, 0, 2π}, PolarAxes -> {True, False}, PolarTicks -> {"Degrees", Automatic}],

Graphics[{Red, Thick, cam}]
]

enter image description here


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...