Skip to main content

numerical integration - Elliptic integrals


In trying to reproduce results from one paper I stumbled upon a problem with definition of some elliptic integrals (this is my guess of what could be the problem).


I will first present in a simplified form what I am trying to calculate, details are in the original paper (PRL 99, 226801, see Google Scholar for PDF)





The goal is to compute the following 2D integral


$$I(k)=-\iint_{\Omega_c}\frac{\mathrm{d}^2\vec q}{4\pi q}\left(1-\cos\theta(\vec k,\vec {k}-\vec {q})\right),$$


where $\theta(\vec a,\vec b)$ is the angle between $\vec a$ and $\vec b$, $q=|\vec q|$. For those who would like to compare with the paper, this is essentially Eq.(2a), where for simplicity I set $e=\kappa=1$, selected the case $s=1$ and substituted all the definitions into one equation.


The integration domain is $\Omega_c: |k|\le k_c$, where $k_c$ is a positive number.


The analytic result is known to be [cf. Eq. (3a)]:


$$I(k)=\tfrac{1}{\pi}k_c\left[h\!\left(k/k_c\right)-f\!\left(k/k_c\right)\right],\quad I(0)=-\tfrac{1}{2}k_c.$$


Assuming, we want to know the result for $k, there are following definitions


$$f(x)=E(x),\quad h(x)=x\left[\tfrac{\pi}{4}\log(4/x)-\tfrac{\pi}{8}\right] -x\int_{0}^x\!\mathrm{d}y\, y^{-3}\left[K(y)-E(y)-\tfrac{\pi}{4}y^2\right].$$ Here $K(x)$ and $E(x)$ are the complete elliptic integral of the first and second kinds, respectively. I do not know, how this integral can be computed, neither by hand or with mathematica...


What is disturbing is that I was not able verify the integral numerically.


In the following, I will first rewrite all the equations in MA language.



i[1]=Integrate[EllipticK[y^2]-EllipticE[y^2],{y,0,1/x},
Assumptions->x>1]
i[2]=Integrate[(EllipticK[y^2]-EllipticE[y^2]-Ï€/4 y^2)/y^3,{y,0,x},
Assumptions->0<=x<=1]
f[x_]=EllipticE[x^2]
h[x_]=x(Ï€/4Log[4/x]-Ï€/8)-x i[2]

Notice, it takes a while to compute i[2]. Now, we will be interested in the $\Delta I(k)=I(k)-I(0)$ function


xi[k_,kc_]:=kc/Ï€(h[k/kc]-f[k/kc])
Δxi[k_,kc_]:=xi[k,kc]+kc/2


Now we define the numerical integral (adding a small cut-off a) transforming it to polar coordinates and assuming $\vec k\parallel \vec e_x$


Δni[k_?NumericQ,kc_?NumericQ,a_?NumericQ]:=1/(4 π) NIntegrate[((k- q Cos[θ])/Sqrt[k^2+q^2-2 k q Cos[θ]]),{q,a,kc},{θ,0,2π},PrecisionGoal->4]

and compare


dataI=Table[{k,Δni[k,30,10^-5]},{k,0.1,2,0.1}]
Plot[Δxi[k,30],{k,0,2},Epilog->{PointSize[Medium],Point[dataI]},PlotRange->{0,2.3}]

enter image description here


The points should exactly fall onto the analytic curve, but they are not... I would be happy with any of the answers:




  1. showing how the integral can be computed analytically with MA starting from the definition (basically confirming that my interpretation of the formula in the paper is correct),

  2. fixing a problem with MA numerics.


Notice, I can easily verify Fig.1 of that paper with MA. But the integral considered here is not plotted there.



Answer



The article "Density Dependent Exchange Contribution to $\partial \mu/\partial n$ and Compressibility in Graphene" by E.H. Hwang,Ben Yu-Kuang Hu, and S. Das Sarma has a typo in the definition of $h$ (there must be a plus before $\frac {\pi}{8}$). After correction, the results match (I wrote down the finished results for the integrals, so as not to waste time every time to calculate them)


(*i[1]=Integrate[EllipticK[y^2]-EllipticE[y^2],{y,0,1/x},Assumptions\
\[Rule]x>1]
i[2]=Integrate[(EllipticK[y^2]-EllipticE[y^2]-\[Pi]/4 \

y^2)/y^3,{y,0,x},Assumptions\[Rule]0\[LessEqual]x\[LessEqual]1]*)

i1[x_] := (\[Pi] (-HypergeometricPFQ[{-(1/2), 1/2, 1/2}, {1, 3/2}, 1/
x^2] + HypergeometricPFQ[{1/2, 1/2, 1/2}, {1, 3/2}, 1/x^2]))/(
2 x)
i2[x_] :=
3/256 \[Pi] x^2 (HypergeometricPFQ[{1, 1, 3/2, 5/2}, {2, 3, 3},
x^2] + 3 HypergeometricPFQ[{1, 1, 5/2, 5/2}, {2, 3, 3}, x^2])
f[x_] := If[x <= 1, EllipticE[x^2],
x EllipticE[1/x^2] - (x - 1/x) EllipticK[1/x^2]]

h[x_] := If[x <= 1, x (\[Pi]/4 Log[4/x] + \[Pi]/8) - x i2[x], x i1[x]]

xi[k_, kc_] := kc/\[Pi] (h[k/kc] - f[k/kc])
\[CapitalDelta]xi[k_, kc_] := xi[k, kc] + kc/2

\[CapitalDelta]ni[k_?NumericQ, kc_?NumericQ, a_?NumericQ] :=
1/(4 \[Pi]) NIntegrate[((k - q Cos[\[Theta]])/
Sqrt[k^2 + q^2 - 2 k q Cos[\[Theta]]]), {q, a, kc}, {\[Theta], 0,
2 \[Pi]}]


dataI = Table[{k, \[CapitalDelta]ni[k, 30, 10^-10]}, {k, 0.1, 2, 0.1}]
Plot[\[CapitalDelta]xi[k, 30], {k, 0, 2},
Epilog -> {PointSize[Medium], Point[dataI]}, PlotRange -> {0, 2.3}]

Figure 1


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...