Skip to main content

functions - FullSimplify does not work on this expression with no unknowns


I can't reproduce this simple example from Habrat, 2010 ("Mathematica : a Problem-Centered Approach"). It is supposed to demonstrate the functionality of FullSimplify, however I can't make it work in Mathematica 9. When I try this:


FullSimplify[ Cot[ (5 Pi)/22 ] + 4 Sin[ (2 Pi)/11 ]]

Mathematica 9 returns the input unchanged:


Cot[ (5 Pi)/22 ] + 4 Sin[ (2 Pi)/11 ]

As shown in the book however, I would rather have expected Sqrt[11]. On the other trying


FullSimplify[ Cot[ (5 Pi)/22 ] + 4 Sin[ (2 Pi)/11 ] == Sqrt[11] ]


Mathematica 9 returns


True

so why not return Sqrt[11] in the first place?



Answer



Before Mathematica 9 FullSimplify[ Cot[ (5 Pi)/22 ] + 4 Sin[ (2 Pi)/11 ]] yielded simply Sqrt[11] while in the newest version we should play a bit with ComplexityFunction. For some reason the ComplexityFunction behavior in FullSimplify has been changed. One can guess that it is just a different gauge of this option. To shed light on this issue let's define the following function :


cfs[n_][e_] :=  n Count[e, _Sin, {0, Infinity}] + LeafCount[e]

After playing a bit we can figure out the threshold values :



FullSimplify[ Cot[(5 Pi)/22] + 4 Sin[(2 Pi)/11], ComplexityFunction -> #] & /@ {
cfs[5], cfs[6], cfs[37], cfs[38] } // Column

enter image description here


In Mathematica 8 and earlier all these complexity functions yield Sqrt[11]. We could find this threshold therein :


FullSimplify[Cot[(5 Pi)/22] + 4 Sin[(2 Pi)/11], ComplexityFunction -> #] & /@ {
cfs[-10], cfs[-9]} // Column

enter image description here


I.e. we have a direct jump between the final results in earlier versions while in ver.9 there are intermediate values where cfs provided an intermediate result. So in the newer version ComplexityFunction is more customizable and therfore it is advantageous.



Another possibility in ver. 9 to get Sqrt[11] might be e.g. :


FullSimplify[ Cot[(5 Pi)/22] + 4 Sin[(2 Pi)/11], TransformationFunctions -> RootReduce]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.