plotting - Probability density histogram with unequal bin widths

I am confused by output of Histogram and HistogramList for probability density ("PDF") when bin widths are not equal.

According to this and this pages and other sources, density histograms are computed by dividing counts by bar widths and total number of observations. But Histogram obviously uses another algorithm as one can see from the following example:

SeedRandom[1];
data = RandomVariate[NormalDistribution[0, 1], 15];
HistogramList[data, {{-2, 0, 1}}, "PDF"][[2]]
BinCounts[data, {{-2, 0, 1}}]/((Length[data] - 3) Differences[{-2, 0, 1}])

{1/6, 2/3}

{1/6, 2/3}

The outputs are identical when bin counts are divided by total number of observations minus 3 in this case. Why is it? What algorithm Histogram uses for determining this difference (in other cases I got other numbers)?

An addition

Rod has answered the original question but there is another issue: if one gives upper bin boundary equal to the upper datapoint value then this value will be excluded from the histogram. It does not contradict the documentation where stated that {{b1,b2,...}} will use the bins [b1,b2),[b2,b3),.... Here is an illustration:

HistogramList[data, {{-2, 0, Max[data] - 10^-13}}, 
   "PDF"][[2]] - HistogramList[data, {{-2, 0, Max[data]}}, "PDF"][[2]]
HistogramList[data, {{-2, 0, Max[data] + 10^-13}}, "PDF"][[2]] - 
 HistogramList[data, {{-2, 0, Max[data]}}, "PDF"][[2]]

{0, 2.99205*10^-14}

{-(1/105), 0.0123342}

One can see that subtraction of 10^-13 does not alter the result significantly as expected but addition of 10^-13 changes it considerably because now the point Max[data] is included in the histogram. One can check this directly:

HistogramList[data, {{-2, 0, Max[data]}}, "PDF"][[2]]
BinCounts[data, {{-2, 0, Max[data]}}]/ 
  Differences[{-2, 0, Max[data]}]/(Length[data] - 1)

HistogramList[data, {{-2, 0, Max[data] + 10^-13}}, "PDF"][[2]]
BinCounts[data, {{-2, 0, Max[data] + 10^-13}}]/ 

  Differences[{-2, 0, Max[data]}]/Length[data]

{1/7, 0.462531}

{1/7, 0.462531}

{2/15, 0.474865}

{2/15, 0.474865}

Answer

Using SeedRandom[1] you get 3 observations higher than 1. When you use Histogram[data,{{-2,0,1}}] you're excluding those 3 observations...

If you exclude those 3 observations, now your probability (i.e., "PDF") should be based on 12 observations, and not 15...

Comments

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Adding a thick curve to a regionplot

Suppose we have the following simple RegionPlot: f[x_] := 1 - x^2 g[x_] := 1 - 0.5 x^2 RegionPlot[{y < f[x], f[x] < y < g[x], y > g[x]}, {x, 0, 2}, {y, 0, 2}] Now I'm trying to change the curve defined by $y=g[x]$ into a thick black curve, while leaving all other boundaries in the plot unchanged. I've tried adding the region $y=g[x]$ and playing with the plotstyle, which didn't work, and I've tried BoundaryStyle, which changed all the boundaries in the plot. Now I'm kinda out of ideas... Any help would be appreciated! Answer With f[x_] := 1 - x^2 g[x_] := 1 - 0.5 x^2 You can use Epilog to add the thick line: RegionPlot[{y < f[x], f[x] < y < g[x], y > g[x]}, {x, 0, 2}, {y, 0, 2}, PlotPoints -> 50, Epilog -> (Plot[g[x], {x, 0, 2}, PlotStyle -> {Black, Thick}][[1]]), PlotStyle -> {Directive[Yellow, Opacity[0.4]], Directive[Pink, Opacity[0.4]],

Blog

Search This Blog