Skip to main content

plotting - Probability density histogram with unequal bin widths



I am confused by output of Histogram and HistogramList for probability density ("PDF") when bin widths are not equal.


According to this and this pages and other sources, density histograms are computed by dividing counts by bar widths and total number of observations. But Histogram obviously uses another algorithm as one can see from the following example:


SeedRandom[1];
data = RandomVariate[NormalDistribution[0, 1], 15];
HistogramList[data, {{-2, 0, 1}}, "PDF"][[2]]
BinCounts[data, {{-2, 0, 1}}]/((Length[data] - 3) Differences[{-2, 0, 1}])


{1/6, 2/3}


{1/6, 2/3}




The outputs are identical when bin counts are divided by total number of observations minus 3 in this case. Why is it? What algorithm Histogram uses for determining this difference (in other cases I got other numbers)?


An addition


Rod has answered the original question but there is another issue: if one gives upper bin boundary equal to the upper datapoint value then this value will be excluded from the histogram. It does not contradict the documentation where stated that {{b1,b2,...}} will use the bins [b1,b2),[b2,b3),.... Here is an illustration:


HistogramList[data, {{-2, 0, Max[data] - 10^-13}}, 
   "PDF"][[2]] - HistogramList[data, {{-2, 0, Max[data]}}, "PDF"][[2]]
HistogramList[data, {{-2, 0, Max[data] + 10^-13}}, "PDF"][[2]] - 
 HistogramList[data, {{-2, 0, Max[data]}}, "PDF"][[2]]



{0, 2.99205*10^-14}


{-(1/105), 0.0123342}



One can see that subtraction of 10^-13 does not alter the result significantly as expected but addition of 10^-13 changes it considerably because now the point Max[data] is included in the histogram. One can check this directly:


HistogramList[data, {{-2, 0, Max[data]}}, "PDF"][[2]]
BinCounts[data, {{-2, 0, Max[data]}}]/ 
  Differences[{-2, 0, Max[data]}]/(Length[data] - 1)

HistogramList[data, {{-2, 0, Max[data] + 10^-13}}, "PDF"][[2]]
BinCounts[data, {{-2, 0, Max[data] + 10^-13}}]/ 

  Differences[{-2, 0, Max[data]}]/Length[data]


{1/7, 0.462531}


{1/7, 0.462531}


{2/15, 0.474865}


{2/15, 0.474865}




Answer



Using SeedRandom[1] you get 3 observations higher than 1. When you use Histogram[data,{{-2,0,1}}] you're excluding those 3 observations...



If you exclude those 3 observations, now your probability (i.e., "PDF") should be based on 12 observations, and not 15...


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...
Post a Comment
Read more

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?
Post a Comment
Read more

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...
Post a Comment
Read more