Skip to main content

programming - Using Goto and Label in different cells?


I'd like to solve an optimization problem, which involves changing the parameters and re-evaluating. The problem is that I can't find a way to jump from one cell to another.


For example:



  1. Set some parameters


  2. Define a system

  3. Evaluate with current parameters

  4. Check if a condition is met

  5. Change parameters and re-evaluate if necessary


I know that Goto[] does not work when Label[] is not in the same compound expression but here is what I want to do:


Example code with Goto and Label


The real code is a bit more lengthy thus Goto[] and Label[] cannot be written in the same compound expression. Is there a simple way to solve this problem or do I have to create a separate notebook/package for the iterative parts of the code?



Answer



I think you are in a context where you have a "real life" problem and you don't care about computer science, good practise for program developpers etc...



Your program is not aimed to be shared, to be reusable, except by you, later, assuming that you have memorized (partly in mind) some traces of what you have done.


Briefly summarized, you write code for yourself, and there's "no holds-barred", only the result of your calculus is interesting.


So you develop some code, interactively, like a script, until you have the result ( - period)


Say you want to use a formula you have found in a book, for example, the calculus of altitude of a geostationary satellit.


Here is the code :


(* constants *) 
gravitationConstant=6.6 10^-11;
earthMass=5.9 10^24;
earthRotationalSpeed= 2 Pi/(3600 24.);
earthRadius=12.700 10^6/2;


(* formula *)
geostationaryAltitude=(earthMass gravitationConstant/(earthRotationalSpeed^2))^(1/3);
result=(geostationaryAltitude-earthRadius) /1000


35563.6



Until here you think of gravitationConstant, earthMass, earthRotationalSpeed as constants. But now you want to try with different values of the earthMass (generally speaking, according to Murphy' s law N°III.3. : "a constant is always variable")


Here is how to modify the code with minimum typing effort :



(* constants *) 
gravitationConstant=6.6 10^-11;
earthMass=5.9 10^24;
earthRotationalSpeed= 2 Pi/(3600 24.);
earthRadius=12.700 10^6/2;

(* formula *)
automatisedScript00[]:=(
geostationaryAltitude=(earthMass gravitationConstant/(earthRotationalSpeed^2))^(1/3);
result=(geostationaryAltitude-earthRadius) /1000

)

and then :


earthMass=5.8 10^24;
automatisedScript00[]
earthMass=6.0 10^24;
automatisedScript00[]


35325.4

35799.



Notes :




  • No need to use Module[...]. Module is intended to localize some variables, it is not a kind of box for automatised-code embedding (function, module, routine etc... in other languages).




  • You could write automatisedScript00 instead of automatisedScript00[]. So far I know, Mathematica's interpretation is the same, but using [] allows you to easily pass the Symbol name without unintentional evaluation.





  • It is easy to "debug" : you can afterward inspect the final state of the variables. Thanks to Dynamic[], you can even observe the variables in "real time".




  • These are informations for computer users, not programmers, for people who want to automatize some action in the way they want, not in the way some people think they "should" use computer with predefined automatized processes, finally for people who refuse to be computer victims.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.