geography - Neighboring counties (within the State of Florida) for every county in the State of Florida

When I attempt evaluating:

 Entity[Alachua County, Florida, United States(administrative division)]   [EntityProperty["AdministrativeDivision","BorderingCounties"]]

I get: Missing["UnknownEntity", {"AdministrativeDivision", {"AlachuaCounty", "Florida", "UnitedStates"}}]

The "BorderingCounties" attribute does NOT work on my computer for some unknown reason. Other attributes (like "BorderingStates") work just fine. I'm attempting to find an alternative way to get the result that I'm seeking. I'm attempting to get a list of neighboring counties (within the State of Florida) for every county in the State of Florida. For example; after evaluating:

 counties=EntityList[US counties in Florida (administrative divisions)];

I first try to build a list of neighboring counties; surrounding Escambia county; within the State of Florida as follows:

 counties[[16]

gives: "Escambia County, Florida, United States" but,

Cases[GeoNearest["USCounty", counties[[16]]], Except[counties[[16]]]]

gives: {"Baldwin County, Alabama, United States", "Escambia County, Alabama, United States", "Santa Rosa, Florida, United States"} (which excludes Escambia County, as I want) but, gives me unwanted neighboring counties from the State of Alabama. How can I accommodate another Except within GeoNearest[] to isolate only the counties in Florida? The only neighboring county to Escambia County within the State of Florida should be Santa Rosa County. Similarly;

 counties[45]

gives: "Nassau County, Florida, United States" and

 Cases[GeoNearest["USCounty", counties[[45]]], Except[counties[[45]]]]

gives: {"Baker County, Florida, United States", "Camden County, Georgia, United States", "Charlton County, Georgia, United States", "Charlton County, Georgia, United States","Duval County, Florida, United States"} but, the answer that I'm seeking is: {"Baker County, Florida, United States", "Duval County, Florida, United States"}. The Except command should eliminate those counties located in Alabama and Georgia to isolate the counties in Florida. Thank you!

Comments

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.

Blog

Search This Blog