Skip to main content

functions - What Method options does FindInstance accept?


While answering Trouble getting FindInstance to return multiple results for certain constraints it became clear that for this problem FindInstance would be better starting with small numbers, but it does not.



The function has the Method option:


Options[FindInstance, Method]   (*  Out: {Method -> Automatic}  *)

Yet, I cannot find documentation for the methods (and methods sub-options) that it accepts.



  • What Method values does FindInstance accept?

  • Will any of them scan an Integer search space small-values first?



Answer



Here is a partial answer. I believe for Method -> {opts}, opts may be any of the following, and they will have whatever effect they have:



Internal`InequalitySolverOptions[]
Internal`ReduceOptions[]
Internal`NSolveOptions[]
(*
{"ARSDecision" -> False, "BrownProjection" -> True, "CAD" -> True, 
 "CADAlgebraicCoefficients" -> True, "CADBacksubstitution" -> Automatic,
 "CADCombineCells" -> True, "CADConstruction" -> Automatic,
 "CADDefaultPrecision" -> 30.103, "CADExtraPrecision" -> 30.103, "CADMethod" -> Automatic, 
 "CADNRootsMethod" -> Automatic, "CADSortVariables" -> Automatic, 
 "CADZeroTest" -> {0, ∞}, "EquationalConstraintsCAD" -> Automatic, 

 "FGLMBasisConversion" -> False, "FGLMElimination" -> Automatic, 
 "GenericCAD" -> True, "GroebnerCAD" -> True, 
 "LinearDecisionMethodCrossovers" -> {0, 30, 20, Automatic}, 
 "LinearEquations" -> True, "LinearQE" -> True, "LWDecision" -> True, 
 "LWPreprocessor" -> Automatic, "ProjectAlgebraic" -> Automatic, 
 "ProveMultiplicities" -> True, "QuadraticQE" -> Automatic, 
 "QVSPreprocessor" -> False, "ReducePowers" -> Automatic, 
 "RootReduced" -> False, "Simplex" -> True, 
 "SimplifyInequalities" -> Automatic, "ThreadOr" -> True, "ZengDecision" -> False}


{"ADDSolveBound" -> 8, "AlgebraicNumberOutput" -> True, 
 "BDDEliminate" -> Automatic, "BooleanInstanceMethod" -> Automatic, 
 "BranchLinearDiophantine" -> False, "CacheReduceResults" -> Automatic,
 "DiscreteSolutionBound" -> 10, "ExhaustiveSearchMaxPoints" -> {1000, 10000}, 
 "FactorEquations" -> Automatic, "FactorInequalities" -> False, 
 "FinitePrecisionGB" -> False, "ImplicitIntegerSolutions" -> Automatic, 
 "IntervalRootsOptions" -> {"AllowIncomplete" -> True, "FailDepth" -> 20,
   "MaxDepth" -> 50, "MaxFailures" -> 100, "MaxIncomplete" -> 1000,
   "MaxSimplified" -> 1000, "MaxSteps" -> 100000, "MinPrecision" -> 12}, 
 "LatticeReduceDiophantine" -> True, "LinearEliminationMaxDepth" -> ∞, 

 "MaxFrobeniusGraph" -> 1000000, "MaxModularPoints" -> 1000000, 
 "MaxModularRoots" -> 1000000, "MaxPrimeIndex" -> 1000000000, 
 "NIntegrateTimeConstraint" -> 60, "PresburgerQE" -> Automatic, 
 "QuickReduce" -> False, "RandomInstances" -> Automatic, 
 "RealRootsOptions" -> {"MaxExtensionDegree" -> 5, "MaxFactorSquareFreeDegree" -> 10000, 
   "MaxNestedRootsDegree" -> 100, "SparsityThreshold" -> 0.02}, 
 "ReorderVariables" -> Automatic, "SieveMaxPoints" -> {10000, 1000000}, 
 "SolveDiscreteSolutionBound" -> 1000000, "SyntacticSolveAssumptions" -> False, 
 "TranscendentalRecursionLimit" -> 12, "UseNestedRoots" -> Automatic, 
 "UseOldReduce" -> False, "UseTranscendentalRoots" -> Automatic, 

 "UseTranscendentalSolve" -> True}

{"ComplexEquationMethod" -> Automatic, "MonomialOrder" -> Automatic, 
 "ReorderVariables" -> True, "SelectCriterion" -> (True &), 
 "Tolerance" -> 0, "UseSlicingHyperplanes" -> True}
*)

I do not know if there are other settings that may be used. Building on comments by belisarius and Mr. Wizard, many (or maybe all) of the above are SystemOptions that may be passed via the Method option to FindInstance. I do not know what all these options do. Here is an example to show they, or at least one of them, have an effect when passed through the Method option (see the discussion of the "SieveMaxPoints" option in Diophantine Polynomial Systems for an example that was the basis for this one):


FindInstance[x^2 + 21 y^3 - 17 z^4 == 632, {x, y, z}, Integers]



FindInstance::nsmet: The methods available to FindInstance are insufficient to find the requested instances or prove they do not exist. >>



FindInstance[x^2 + 21 y^3 - 17 z^4 == 632, {x, y, z}, Integers, 
 Method -> {"SieveMaxPoints" -> {10^4, 10^8}}]
(*  {{x -> -944, y -> 22, z -> 16}}  *)

Update - another example. This one is from Real Polynomial Systems mentioned by @belisarius. It is the last example in the tutorial and it is supposed to show a case in which "ZengDecision" -> True improves the timing. In that respect things seem to have changed, but the option still has an effect.


FindInstance[
  x^4 + y^4 + z^4 + w^4 - 5 x y z w + x^2 + y^2 + z^2 + w^2 + 1 < 0,

  {x, y, z, w}, Reals] // AbsoluteTiming
(*  {0.140519, {{x -> -6, y -> -5, z -> -6, w -> -4}}}  *)

FindInstance[
  x^4 + y^4 + z^4 + w^4 - 5 x y z w + x^2 + y^2 + z^2 + w^2 + 1 < 0,
  {x, y, z, w}, Reals, Method -> "ZengDecision" -> True] // AbsoluteTiming
(*  {0.4111, {{x -> -(7/2), y -> -4, z -> -3, w -> -3}}}  *)

Note: There are other Internal`*Options with corresponding Internal`Set*Options, which might be used in certain cases of FindInstance. And if not in FindInstance, then perhaps they can be used in other functions with an obscure Method option. Each with one exception corresponds to a group of SystemOptions[].


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....
Post a Comment
Read more