Skip to main content

numerical integration - What is the correct way to use NIntegrate inside the FindMinimum function?


I'm having minor issues with the FindMinimum function when using NIntegrate inside. The functions work perfectly well but I get warning messages and I was wondering if maybe I could be enlightened on the correct usage of these two functions together.


For the sake of illustration I provide the full set of functions I used on a simple example.


phi[t_, k_, h_] := (1/h)^3*
Piecewise[{{(h (1 - k) + t)^2 (h (1 + 2 k) - 2 t), (k - 1) h <= t <=

k*h}, {(h (1 + k) - t)^2 (h (1 - 2 k) + 2 t),
k*h <= t <= (k + 1) h}}];
psi[t_, k_, h_] := (1/h)^3*
Piecewise[{{(t - k*h) (h + t - k*h)^2, (k - 1) h <= t <=
k*h}, {(t - k*h) (h - t + k*h)^2, k *h <= t <= (k + 1)*h}}] ;
phipp[t_, k_, h_] := (1/h)^3*
Piecewise[{{2 (h (1 + 2 k) - 2 t) - 8 (h (1 - k) + t), (k - 1) h <=
t <= k*h}, {-8 (h (1 + k) - t) + 2 (h (1 - 2 k) + 2 t),
k*h <= t <= (k + 1) h}}];
psipp[t_, k_, h_] := (1/h)^3*

Piecewise[{{2 (-h k + t) + 4 (h - h k + t), (k - 1) h <= t <=
k*h}, {-4 (h + h k - t) + 2 (-h k + t),
k*h <= t <= (k + 1) h}}];
alpha[t_, k_, h_] := phi[t, k, h] + phipp[t, k, h];
beta[t_, k_, h_] := psi[t, k, h] + psipp[t, k, h];
T = Pi;
n = 2;
h = T/n;
FindMinimum[
NIntegrate[(h*beta[t, 0, h] - h*beta[t, n, h] +

a.Table[alpha[t, i, h], {i, 1, n - 1}] +
b.Table[h*beta[t, i, h], {i, 1, n - 1}])^2, {t, 0,
T}], {{a, {0.76}}, {b, {0.4}}}, Method -> "ConjugateGradient"]

I get the following warning message :


NIntegrate::inumr: "The integrand (a.{(8 Piecewise[{<<2>>},0])/\[Pi]^3+(8 Piecewise[{<<2>>},0])/\[Pi]^3}+b.{1/2\\[Pi]\(8\Power[<<2>>]\Piecewise[<<2>>]+8\Power[<<2>>]\Piecewise[<<2>>])}-1/2\\[Pi]\((8 Piecewise[{{<<2>>},{<<2>>}},0])/\[Pi]^3+(8 Piecewise[{{<<2>>},{<<2>>}},0])/\[Pi]^3)+1/2\\[Pi]\((8 Piecewise[{{<<2>>},{<<2>>}},0])/\[Pi]^3+(8 Piecewise[{{<<2>>},{<<2>>}},0])/\[Pi]^3))^2 has evaluated to non-numerical values for all sampling points in the region with boundaries {{0,3.14159}}"

I ask about this because FindMinimum takes unexpectedly long time to converge to the solution (which is a right one). But I thought that maybe using the functions correctly will accelerate the process.



Answer



The problem is indeed that Mathematica tries to do numerical operations before the symbols have value. You can fix this as follows.



Preliminary definitions, unchanged from yours


phi[t_, k_, h_] := (1/h)^3*
Piecewise[{{(h (1 - k) + t)^2 (h (1 + 2 k) - 2 t), (k - 1) h <=
t <= k*h}, {(h (1 + k) - t)^2 (h (1 - 2 k) + 2 t),
k*h <= t <= (k + 1) h}}];
psi[t_, k_, h_] := (1/h)^3*
Piecewise[{{(t - k*h) (h + t - k*h)^2, (k - 1) h <= t <=
k*h}, {(t - k*h) (h - t + k*h)^2, k*h <= t <= (k + 1)*h}}];
phipp[t_, k_, h_] := (1/h)^3*
Piecewise[{{2 (h (1 + 2 k) - 2 t) - 8 (h (1 - k) + t), (k - 1) h <=

t <= k*h}, {-8 (h (1 + k) - t) + 2 (h (1 - 2 k) + 2 t),
k*h <= t <= (k + 1) h}}];
psipp[t_, k_, h_] := (1/h)^3*
Piecewise[{{2 (-h k + t) + 4 (h - h k + t), (k - 1) h <= t <=
k*h}, {-4 (h + h k - t) + 2 (-h k + t),
k*h <= t <= (k + 1) h}}];
alpha[t_, k_, h_] := phi[t, k, h] + phipp[t, k, h];
beta[t_, k_, h_] := psi[t, k, h] + psipp[t, k, h];
T = Pi;
n = 2;

h = T/n;

Pull the integral out of the FindMinimum and make it only evaluate for numerical lists


Here's the integral, defined so as to only evaluate for numeric lists. This is cumbersome because of the way a is defined (to be a list).


ClearAll[fn];
fn[a_?(VectorQ[#, NumericQ] &), b_?(VectorQ[#, NumericQ] &)] :=
NIntegrate[(h*beta[t, 0, h] - h*beta[t, n, h] +
a.Table[alpha[t, i, h], {i, 1, n - 1}] +
b.Table[h*beta[t, i, h], {i, 1, n - 1}])^2, {t, 0, T}]


And now FindMinimum has no problem:


FindMinimum[fn[a, b], {{a, {0.76}}, {b, {0.4}}}, 
Method -> "ConjugateGradient"]

Mathematica graphics


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

Is there a way to do conditional matrix loop using 'continue'

I have the following: n = 3; m = 5; ww = RandomReal[{0, 0.1}, {n, n}]; uu = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {m, n}]; pp = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {n, n}]; ss = RandomInteger[{0, 5}, {m, n}]; Grid[{{"ww", "uu", "pp", "ss"}, {ww // TableForm, uu // TableForm, pp // TableForm, ss // TableForm}}, Spacings -> {5, 2}, Dividers -> All] where I would like to look at every element of matrix ss and produce a matrix tt , with zeroes at the locations in ss which have zeroes, and in all other positions do the following: tt = (-1/Subscript[ww, m]) Log[(1 - uu)/(Subscript[pp, m - 1])], where Subscript[ww, m] is the value at index of ww matrix and where Subscript[pp, m - 1] is the value at index-1 of pp matrix. So for example if the first value ever read from matrix ss happens to be 2, then value taken from matrix ww would be from the row 2, but from pp would be from row 1. Also how to tell difference between a 0 as a valid value from within the matrix elemen...