Skip to main content

graphics - How to generate a closed B-spline curve?


I wrote a function called deBoor using the Cox-de Boor algorithm to generate a B-spline curve.


(*Search the index of span [ui,ui+1)*)

searchSpan[knots_, u0_] :=
With[{max = Max[knots]},
If[u0 == max,
Position[knots, max][[1, 1]] - 2,
Ordering[UnitStep[u0 - knots], 1][[1]] - 2]
]
(*The definition of α coefficient*)
α[{deg_, knots_}, {j_, k_}, u0_] /;
knots[[j + deg + 2]] == knots[[j + k + 1]] := 0
α[{deg_, knots_}, {j_, k_}, u0_] :=

(u0 - knots[[j + k + 1]])/(knots[[j + deg + 2]] - knots[[j + k + 1]])

(*Implementation of de Boor algorithm*)
deBoor[pts : {{_, _} ..}, {deg_, knots_}, u0_] :=
Module[{calcNextGroup, idx = searchSpan[knots, u0]},
calcNextGroup =
Function[{points, k},
Module[{coords, coeffs},
coords = Partition[points, 2, 1];
coeffs = {1 - #, #} & /@ (α[{deg, knots}, {#, k + 1}, u0] & /@

Range[idx - deg, idx - k - 1]);
{Plus @@@ MapThread[Times, {coords, coeffs}], k + 1}]
];
Nest[calcNextGroup[Sequence @@ #] &,
{pts[[idx - deg + 1 ;; idx + 1]], 0}, deg][[1, 1]]
]

TEST


points = 
{{1, 4}, {.5, 6}, {5, 4}, {3, 12}, {11, 14}, {8, 4}, {12, 3}, {11, 9}, {15, 10}, {17, 8}};

(*here, I set the knots uniformly*)
knots = {0, 0, 0, 0, 1/7, 2/7, 3/7, 4/7, 5/7, 6/7, 1, 1, 1, 1};

ParametricPlot[
deBoor[points, {3, knots}, t], {t, 0, 1}, Axes -> False]

enter image description here


Now, I need to close this curve. My first thought is append the first point to the pts list.


pointsCLOSE = 
{{1, 4}, {.5, 6}, {5, 4}, {3, 12}, {11, 14}, {8, 4}, {12, 3},

{11, 9}, {15, 10}, {17, 8}, {1, 4}};
(*here, I set the knots uniformly*)
knotsCLOSE = {0, 0, 0, 0, 1/8, 2/8, 3/8, 4/8, 5/8, 6/8, 7/8, 1, 1, 1, 1};
ParametricPlot[
deBoor[pointsCLOSE, {3, knotsCLOSE}, t], {t, 0, 1}, Axes -> False]

enter image description here


However, the built-in BSplineCurve gives a different curve


Graphics[{BSplineCurve[points, SplineClosed -> True]}]


enter image description here


The comparison of two graphics


enter image description here


So my thought is wrong


In the chat room, thanks to halirutan's suggestion



For this closed form, you need to assume the endpoints to be periodic. It is not enough to just pre-/append one point.



QUESTION





  • What does the the endpoints to be periodic mean? I didn't learn it from The NURBS Book




  • How to generate a closed B-spline curve like the built-in BSplineCurve[pts, SplineClosed -> True] ?




UPDATE


uniformKnots[pts_, deg_] :=
With[{n = Length@pts},

Join[
ConstantArray[0, deg + 1],
Range[1, n - deg - 1]/(n - deg),
ConstantArray[1, deg + 1]]
]

Manipulate[
With[{pts = Join[points, points[[1 ;; n]]]},
ParametricPlot[
deBoor[pts, {3, uniformKnots[pts, 3]}, t], {t, 0, 1},

Axes -> False]], {n, 1, 10, 1}
]

enter image description here



  • I didn't how many points should I append to the original points list?



Answer



The following works for your curve:


points = {{1, 4}, {.5, 6}, {5, 4}, {3, 12}, {11, 14}, {8, 4}, {12, 3}, {11, 9},

{15, 10}, {17, 8}};
deg = 3;
pointsCLOSE1 = Join[points, points];
n = Length@pointsCLOSE1;
knotsCLOSE1 = Range[0, 1, 1/(n + 1)];
ParametricPlot[deBoor[pointsCLOSE1, {deg, knotsCLOSE1}, t], {t, deg/(n + 1), 1},
Axes -> False]

Mathematica graphics


And also for many other curves



curve[nPts_, deg_] := Module[{points, pointsCLOSE1, n, knotsCLOSE1},
points = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {nPts, 2}];
pointsCLOSE1 = Join[points, points];
n = Length@pointsCLOSE1;
knotsCLOSE1 = Range[0, 1, 1/(n + 1)];
ParametricPlot[ deBoor[pointsCLOSE1, {deg, knotsCLOSE1}, t],
{t, deg/(n + 1), 1}, Axes -> False]
]

degs = RandomInteger[{3, 6}, 6];

npoints = RandomInteger[{2 #, 3 #}] & /@ degs;
Partition[MapThread[curve, {npoints, degs}], 3] // Grid

Mathematica graphics


But I've also found some counterexamples, so it should be taken with care ...


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.