Skip to main content

replacement - Embedding StreamPlot in Graphics3D


I am trying to visualise the action of the infinitesimal generator of a Lie group on the solution of a 2-ODE system drawn in the 3D space (t,y1,y2): t is time and y1,y2 are the two dependent variables.


The infinitesimal generator of a Lie group is a vector field and can be visualized nicely using StreamPlot. For a system like this it would normally be a 3D vector field. In this case, however, the symmetry corresponding to the vector field is 2D and (by design) perpendicular to the time axis. Therefore, the vector field can be drawn as a vertical plane (since I am drawing the time axis horizontally).


In another post I found an answer that almost works: Can 2D and 3D plots be combined so that the 2D plot is the bottom surface of the 3D plot boundary?. In my case the 2D plot is at the back and vertical, rather than at the bottom, but it was easy to modify the code in that other post to obtain this effect.



Preliminaries:


Clear[y1, y2S1, y2S2, y2S3, S, R0, X0]
X0 = 1.5;
R0 = 1.5;
y1[t_, S_] := S - (S - X0) Exp[-t]
y2S1[t_] := 1 + Exp[Exp[-t] - t]*
((R0 - 1)/E - ExpIntegralEi[-1] + ExpIntegralEi[Sinh[t] - Cosh[t]])
y2S2[t_] := 1 - (1 - R0) Exp[-t/2]
y2S3[t_] := (1/3)*Exp[-2 Exp[-t] - 4 t]*(E^2 (3 R0 - 11) + 8 ExpIntegralEi[2] +
Exp[2 Exp[-t] + t]*(4 + 2 Exp[t] + 2 Exp[2 t] + 3 Exp[3 t]) -

8 ExpIntegralEi[2 Exp[-t]])

pp3d = ParametricPlot3D[{{t, y1[t, 0.5], y2S1[t]},
{t, y1[t, 1], y2S2[t]},
{t, y1[t, 2], y2S3[t]}}, {t, 0, 5},
PlotStyle -> {{Thickness[.007], RGBColor[1, 0, 0]},
{Thickness[.007], RGBColor[0, .7, 0]},
{Thickness[.007], RGBColor[0, 0, 1]}},
BoxRatios -> {2, 1, 1},
PlotRange -> {{0, 5}, {0, 2}, {0, 2}}]


Code:


S = 2;
test = StreamPlot[{x - S, 2 x*y - S}, {x, 0, 3}, {y, 0, 3}];
Make3d[plot_, height_] := Module[{newplot},
newplot = First@Graphics[plot];
newplot = N@newplot /. {x_?AtomQ, y_?AtomQ} :> {height, x, y}];
Show[{Graphics3D[Make3d[test, 0]], pp3d}, Axes -> True]

However, I got this error:



Encountered "1." where a Graphics was expected in the value of option Arrowheads.

With corresponding graphical output:


3D_Space_Curve_error


S is a parameter. The three curves in R, G, B are three solutions for three different values of S so the vector field is not mapping between these curves. It is acting on any one of these at a time, mapping it to some other solution not shown here. But no matter.


It's clear that there is something wrong with the arrows. I am guessing StreamPlot defines them as 2D and they need to be converted to a 3D spec, but I have no idea how to go about that. I can guess that the code above (which I understand only roughly) is doing this kind of conversion, but perhaps it is not reaching the arrow data structure within StreamPlot.


Can anyone help?


Thanks (Using MMA 9)



Answer



The problem lies in the overly general pattern used in Make3d to detect (x, y) pairs.



The quick fix is to skip Arrowheads expressions by using a superseding rule:


Make3d[plot_, height_] :=
N @ First @ Graphics @ plot /. {
skip : _Arrowheads :> skip,
{x_?AtomQ, y_?AtomQ} :> {height, x, y}
}

(I got rid of the Module because IMHO it was extraneous here.)


Result:


enter image description here



You could add any other problematic heads to the skip rule with Alternatives, e.g.


skip : _Arrowheads | _head1 | _head2 :> skip

More robust perhaps would be to create a list of primitives to operate inside, effectively skipping everything else. This could be done with a double (nested) replace operation, but my implementation will have to wait until later.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...