Skip to main content

probability or statistics - Function of a random variable


Here is a probability density function (PDF)


pdfq[q_] = C q^(4 n ν - 1) (1 - q)^(4 n μ - 1)


Pq(Q=q)=Cq4nν1(1q)4nμ1


I'd like to find the PDF of l (noted Pl(L=l)), which is a function of q.


f[q_] = 2 q s

f(q)=2qs


What is the PDF of l?




Here is my try


I think f(q) is an invertible, differentiable and continuously increasing function of q and therefore:



Pl(L=l)=Pq(f1(l))|df1(l)dl|


according to wiki, where f1(..) is the inverse function of f(..).


Calculating this with Mathematica gives:


In[1]:= pdfq[q_] = 
C E^(4 n s q ) q^(4 n ν - 1) (1 - q)^(4 n μ - 1)

Out[1]= C E^(4 n q s) (1 - q)^(-1 + 4 n μ) q^(-1 + 4 n ν)

In[2]:= f[q_] = 2 q s


Out[2]= 2 q s

In[3]:= Solve[l == f[q], q]

Out[3]= {{q -> l/(2 s)}}

In[4]:= finverse[l_] = l/(2 s)

Out[4]= l/(2 s)


In[5]:= Absdfinversedl[l] = Abs[Integrate[finverse[l], l]]

Out[5]= 1/4 Abs[l^2/s]

In[7]:= pdfl[l_] = pdfq[finverse[l]] Absdfinversedl[l]

Out[7]= 2^(-1 - 4 n ν) C E^(
2 l n) (1 - l/(2 s))^(-1 + 4 n μ) (l/s)^(-1 + 4 n ν)
Abs[l^2/s]


In[8]:= pdfl[0.5] /. C -> 1 /. n -> 1000 /. μ -> 0.02 /. ν ->
0.05 /. s -> 0.1 // N

Out[8]= -1.554651720194871*10^527

But the result is obviously not correct as I get negative probability densities. What am I doing wrong? Does the problem have to do with my constant of integration C? Thanks a lot for your help.



Answer



First look into the documentation to see if your distribution is already defined. If it is not, you can define your own distribution based on its PDF or CDF using ProbabilityDistribution.


dist=ProbabilityDistribution[ C q^(4 n Nu - 1) (1 - q)^(4 n Mu - 1), {q, 0, 1}, ...]


(This is incomplete, you need to define the ranges of the parameters)


Whatever ranges you variables and parameters are, you could test it by obtaining Mean[dist] or PDF[dist,x] and checking that the there are no errors.


Now you have your original distribution, you want to transform it using TransformedDistribution .


tDist = TransformedDistribution[2 q s, q \[Distributed] dist[Nu, Mu]]

Now the PDF of your new transformed distributions would be PDF[tDist,x]


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]