Skip to main content

compile - How to boost the performance of my own BSplineFunction


In my CAGD package, I implemented a CAGDBSplineFunction[] like built-in BSplineFunction[]. Here is a performance comparison:


pts = Table[{ Cos[2 Pi u/6] Cos[v], Sin[2 Pi u/6] Cos[v], v}, {u, 6}, {v, -1, 1, 1/2}];
f = BSplineFunction[pts]
g = CAGDBSplineFunction[pts]

ParametricPlot3D[f[u, v], {u, 0, 1}, {v, 0, 1}] // AbsoluteTiming
ParametricPlot3D[g[u, v], {u, 0, 1}, {v, 0, 1}] // AbsoluteTiming


enter image description here


Obviously, my CAGDBSplineFunction[] is far slower(about 20X) than the built-in BSplineFunction[]


The CAGDBSplineFunction[] mainly uses an auxiliary function functionalNonzeroBasis[] to compute the coordinate of a parameter pair $(u,v)$.


To improve the performance, I refactor the functionalNonzeroBasis[] to compiledNonzeroBasis[]


searchSpan[{deg_, knots_}, u_] := 
With[{un = knots[[-(deg + 1)]]},
If[u == un,
Position[knots, un][[1, 1]] - 2,
Ordering[UnitStep[u - knots], 1][[1]] - 2

]
]

coeff[u_, U_, i_, p_] :=
If[U[[i + p + 1]] != U[[i + 1]],
(u - U[[i + 1]])/(U[[i + p + 1]] - U[[i + 1]]), 0]

compiledNonzeroBasis=
ReleaseHold[
Hold@Compile[{{i, _Integer}, {p, _Integer}, {u, _Real, 1}, {u0, _Real}},

Module[
{lst = Table[0., {p + 2}, {p + 1}], cc = i - 2},
lst[[2, 1]] = 1.0;
Do[
lst[[m + n - cc, n + 1]] =
coeff[u0, u, m, n] lst[[m + n - 1 - cc, n]] + (1 -
coeff[u0, u, m + 1, n]) lst[[m + n - cc, n]],
{n, 1, p}, {m, i - n, i}
];
lst // Transpose // Last // Rest

], CompilationTarget -> "C", RuntimeOptions -> "Speed"
] /. DownValues[coeff]
]

compiledBSplineSurf[
ctrlnets_, {{deg1_, knots1_}, {deg2_, knots2_}},
u_?NumericQ, v_?NumericQ] :=
Module[{i, j, validnets, row, col},
i = searchSpan[{deg1, knots1}, u];
j = searchSpan[{deg2, knots2}, v];

validnets =
Take[ctrlnets, {i - deg1 + 1, i + 1}, {j - deg2 + 1, j + 1}];
row = compiledNonzeroBasis[i, deg1, knots1, u];
col = compiledNonzeroBasis[j, deg2, knots2, v];
row.Transpose[validnets, {1, 3, 2}].col
]

Test


(*knot vector*)
k1 = {0., 0., 0., 0., 0.333333, 0.666667, 1., 1., 1., 1.};

k2 = {0., 0., 0., 0., 0.5, 1., 1., 1., 1.};

ParametricPlot3D[
compiledBSplineSurf[pts, {{3, k1}, {3, k2}}, u, v],
{u, 0, 1}, {v, 0, 1}] // AbsoluteTiming

This time the performance improves about 2X


enter image description here


Another trial is trying Compile`GetElement


With[{get = Compile`GetElement},

basisCoeff[deg_, U_, i_, u_] :=
If[U[[i + deg + 1]] != U[[i + 1]],
(u - get[U, i + 1])/(get[U, i + deg + 1] - get[U, i + 1]),
(*case for ui=uj*)
0.0
];
optimizedNonzeroBasis =
ReleaseHold[
Hold@Compile[{{i, _Integer}, {deg, _Integer}, {knots, _Real, 1}, {u0, _Real}},
Module[{lst = Table[0., {deg + 2}, {deg + 1}], c = i - 2},

lst[[2, 1]] = 1.0;
Do[
With[{mn = m + n},
lst[[mn - c, n + 1]] =
basisCoeff[n, knots, m, u0] get[lst, mn - c - 1, n] +
(1 - basisCoeff[n, knots, m + 1, u0]) get[lst,
mn - c, n]
],
{n, 1, deg}, {m, i - n, i}
];

Rest@Last[Transpose[lst]
]
], CompilationTarget -> "C", RuntimeOptions -> "Speed"
] /. DownValues[basisCoeff]]
]

ParametricPlot3D[
optimizedBSplineSurf[pts, {{3, k1}, {3, k2}}, u, v],
{u, 0, 1}, {v, 0, 1}] // AbsoluteTiming


enter image description here


So I would like to know:



  • Is it possible to further improve/boost the performance of compiledBSplineSurf[]?




Update:


For the optimizedBSplineSurf[], just replace compiledNonzeroBasis[] with optimizedNonzeroBasis[]



Answer



You just need to fully compile your function:



fullycompiledBSplineSurf = 
Hold@Compile[{{ctrlnets, _Real, 3}, {deg1, _Integer}, {deg2, _Integer},
{knots1, _Real, 1}, {knots2, _Real, 1}, {u, _Real}, {v, _Real}},
Module[{i, j, validnets, row, col},
i = searchSpan[{deg1, knots1}, u];
j = searchSpan[{deg2, knots2}, v];
validnets = Take[ctrlnets, {i - deg1 + 1, i + 1}, {j - deg2 + 1, j + 1}];
row = optimizedNonzeroBasis[i, deg1, knots1, u];
col = optimizedNonzeroBasis[j, deg2, knots2, v];
row.Transpose[validnets, {1, 3, 2}].col

],
CompilationOptions -> {"InlineExternalDefinitions" -> True},
"RuntimeOptions" -> {"EvaluateSymbolically" -> False},
CompilationTarget -> C, RuntimeOptions -> "Speed"
] /. DownValues@searchSpan // ReleaseHold;

ParametricPlot3D[
fullycompiledBSplineSurf[pts, 3, 3, k1, k2, u, v],
{u, 0, 1}, {v, 0, 1}] // AbsoluteTiming


enter image description here


Now the function is about half as fast as the built-in:


ParametricPlot3D[f[u, v], {u, 0, 1}, {v, 0, 1}] // AbsoluteTiming

enter image description here


I think I don't need to make any explanation, because all the techniques above have been used in answering your previous questions.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....