Skip to main content

mathematical optimization - Principal Axis Maximization



I know that, in order to use PrincipalAxis, for example in FindMaximum function:


FindMaximum[
f[x,y], {{x,x0,x1},{y,y0,y1}}, Method -> "PrincipalAxis"]

You have to provide two initial points, for each argument. However, PrincipalAxis also seems to work when just one initial point is given. Do you know what actually Mathematica does in such a case?



Answer



The starting point is the Principal Axis Method tutorial:



For an $n$-variable problem, take a set of search directions $u_1,u_2,...,u_n$ and a point $x_0$. Take $x_i$ to be the point that minimizes $f$ along the direction $u_i$ from $x_{i-1}$ (i.e. do a line search from $x_{i-1}$), then replace $u_i$ with $u_{i+1}$.


Two distinct starting conditions in each variable are required for this method because these are used to define the magnitudes of the vectors $u_i$.




I think that the first parameter is the starting point, $x_0$, and, combined with the second parameter, both define the magnitude of the search direction.


One can start to delve into the behaviour using EvaluationMonitor. First, using a single parameter of 0.5, the search is quite close to the initial starting point of 0.5.


FindMinimum[x^2, {{x, 0.5}}, Method -> "PrincipalAxis",
EvaluationMonitor :> Print["x = ", x]]
(* x = 0.5
x = 0.484
x = 0.474
x = 0.407
x = 5.8e-15

... *)

I think, for the case of the second parameter, not specifying it is the same as setting it to zero, since


FindMinimum[x^2, {{x, 0.5, 0}}, Method -> "PrincipalAxis", 
EvaluationMonitor :> Print["x = ", x]]

gives the same behaviour as above.


Compare with specifying a huge second parameter, where the search initially jumps a long way from the starting point.


FindMinimum[x^2, {{x, 0.5, 10000}}, Method -> "PrincipalAxis",
EvaluationMonitor :> Print["x = ", x]]

(* x = 0.5
x = 312.984
x = -192.626
x = 119.858
x = -73.276
x = 3.2e-15
... *)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.