Skip to main content

mathematical optimization - Principal Axis Maximization



I know that, in order to use PrincipalAxis, for example in FindMaximum function:


FindMaximum[
f[x,y], {{x,x0,x1},{y,y0,y1}}, Method -> "PrincipalAxis"]

You have to provide two initial points, for each argument. However, PrincipalAxis also seems to work when just one initial point is given. Do you know what actually Mathematica does in such a case?



Answer



The starting point is the Principal Axis Method tutorial:



For an n-variable problem, take a set of search directions u1,u2,...,un and a point x0. Take xi to be the point that minimizes f along the direction ui from xi−1 (i.e. do a line search from xi−1), then replace ui with ui+1.


Two distinct starting conditions in each variable are required for this method because these are used to define the magnitudes of the vectors ui.




I think that the first parameter is the starting point, x0, and, combined with the second parameter, both define the magnitude of the search direction.


One can start to delve into the behaviour using EvaluationMonitor. First, using a single parameter of 0.5, the search is quite close to the initial starting point of 0.5.


FindMinimum[x^2, {{x, 0.5}}, Method -> "PrincipalAxis",
EvaluationMonitor :> Print["x = ", x]]
(* x = 0.5
x = 0.484
x = 0.474
x = 0.407
x = 5.8e-15

... *)

I think, for the case of the second parameter, not specifying it is the same as setting it to zero, since


FindMinimum[x^2, {{x, 0.5, 0}}, Method -> "PrincipalAxis", 
EvaluationMonitor :> Print["x = ", x]]

gives the same behaviour as above.


Compare with specifying a huge second parameter, where the search initially jumps a long way from the starting point.


FindMinimum[x^2, {{x, 0.5, 10000}}, Method -> "PrincipalAxis",
EvaluationMonitor :> Print["x = ", x]]

(* x = 0.5
x = 312.984
x = -192.626
x = 119.858
x = -73.276
x = 3.2e-15
... *)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]