Skip to main content

polynomials - How to express the original ideal elements in the Groebner basis?


Suppose I call


GroebnerBasis[{f1, f2, ...}, {x1,x2, ...}]

The output is a list


{g1,g2,...}


For each $g_j$, there should be an expression $g_j = \sum f_i h_{ij}$ for some polynomials $h_{ij}$. How do I make Mathematica output the $h$'s?




In case there is a better approach, I'll tell you my actual goal. I have polynomials $\{ f_1, f_2, \ldots, \}$ which generate an ideal $I$, and an element $q$ which I know to be invertible in the quotient ring $\mathbb{R}[x_1, x_2, \ldots]/I$. I want to generate an explicit polynomial representative for $q^{-1}$. My plan is to compute the Groebner basis of the ideal $\langle f_1, f_2, \ldots, q \rangle$, which will be $\{ 1 \}$, and find the expression $1 = \sum f_i h_i + pq$; the answer is then $p$. Calling PolynomialReduce[1,{f1, f2, ..., q}] does not have the intended effect because {f1, f2, ..., q} is not a Groebner basis.



Answer



Here is how I would go about finding the reciprocal as a member of that quotient ideal. I'll demonstrate with an example.


We start with polynomials that generate an ideal I in Q[x,y,z].


polys = {x^2 + x*y - z^3 + 3, x*y - y^2 + 2*z - 5, 
58 x - 4*y^2*z - 3*x*z + 7};


Here is the polyniomial we wish to invert in Q/I. We will set it equal to a new variable 'q'.


qpoly = x*y*z^2 + x^2*z^2 - 3*y^2 - 4*x + 2;

We make an explicit inversion relation using a new "reciprocal" variable.


recippoly = q*qrecip - 1;

Now form a Groebner basis, eliminating 'q' but not its reciprocal.


Timing[
gb = GroebnerBasis[
Join[polys, {q - qpoly, recippoly}], {qrecip, x, y, z}, q];]


(* Out[228]= {0.050000, Null} *)

Now filter out members that do not involve that reciprocal.


rpolys = Select[gb, ! FreeQ[#, qrecip] &];

Last we explicitly solve for the reciprocal.


qrecip /. Solve[rpolys == 0, qrecip]

(* Out[237]= \

{(26865976210184208452733700652828855812422384556246644691932501381503\
562817680 -
243502922707328415287593805560731167473204552630142461410610182847\
7051371070 z +
159758899358659297213970169948368802291120932841779568680462060819\
8342054959 z^2 +
117356001085553879314729354875822466004292087013976143694746220636\
08549556104 z^3 +
670871729437581239452745061221877350353798793983114023985403960308\
9597922596 z^4 +

742733530743532277159318817234115610566358359729018365599178560074\
149841571 z^5 -
123017424636603617320966572335457938227737349248956271019315675654\
817148075 z^6 -
120597839923722484422028319621260872787188437259504489268758105960\
490943543 z^7 -
589550060248794720654074609791788306633207078515514201007961400753\
44770617 z^8 -
959376629620096206267937411987608577860579884873406028793609896234\
3719923 z^9 -

161491469959962690666417014268063263295810695614595035192399568987\
4377976 z^10 +
281126429639293832101523727394804818571984663246643057444386184104\
014888 z^11 -
842500954350297074203419395874006533554497667367625627509322289419\
9144 z^12)/
94053848810936873074377725665691572019272504902971426379079192228628\
9247813475} *)

To respond to your original question, which may be relevant if you absolutely require expression the reciprocal in terms of the original idfeal generators, you might have a look at this post: http://forums.wolfram.com/mathgroup/archive/2011/Mar/msg00362.html



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....