Skip to main content

programming - Improve the performance of solutions to Project Euler (#14)


Problem


I have following code, when n<=10^5 it's not slow, but n>2*10^5 it's became very slow. I think maybe some temp value greater than 2^31-1, so make compile invalid. Could you give any idea make it can be compiled? As far as possible not to use recursive algorithm.



pe14 = Compile[{},
Module[{n1, len, maxLen = 0, res = 0},
Do[n1 = n;
len = 1;
While[n1 != 1,
n1 = If[EvenQ@n1, n1~Quotient~2, 3 n1 + 1];
len++
];
If[len > maxLen, maxLen = len; res = n],
{n, 1, 10^6}];

{maxLen, res}
]
];

pe14[] // AbsoluteTiming

Answer



A print statement shows that this will overflow on platforms where Mathematica machine integers are 32 bits.


pe14 = Compile[{}, Module[{n1, len, maxLen = 0, res = 0, print = 0},
Do[n1 = n;
len = 1;

While[n1 != 1, n1 = If[EvenQ@n1, n1~Quotient~2, 3 n1 + 1];
If[n1 > 10^4*n && print < 10, print++; Print[{n, n1}]];
len++];
If[len > maxLen, maxLen = len; res = n], {n, 1, 2 10^5}];
{maxLen, res}]];

pe14[] // AbsoluteTiming

During evaluation of In[356]:= {77671,1047216490}


During evaluation of In[356]:= {77671,1570824736}

During evaluation of In[356]:= {77671,785412368}

During evaluation of In[356]:= {103561,1047216490}

During evaluation of In[356]:= {103561,1570824736}

During evaluation of In[356]:= {113383,1654740898}


During evaluation of In[356]:= {113383,2482111348}

During evaluation of In[356]:= {113383,1241055674}

During evaluation of In[356]:= {113383,1861583512}

During evaluation of In[356]:= {113383,1325287492}

Out[357]= {4.547872, {383, 156159}}


On 64 bit platforms it will run to completion. Takes around 18 seconds on my desktop.


You can cut a factor of 2 by only explicitly handling odd values, adjusting for evens that are multiples thereof. Another factor of 4 comes from compiling to C.


pe14b = Compile[{{top, _Integer}}, 
Module[{n1, len, maxLen = 0, res = 0},
Do[n1 = n;
len = 1;
While[n1 != 1, n1 = If[EvenQ@n1, n1~Quotient~2, 3 n1 + 1];
len++];
If[len > maxLen, maxLen = len + Floor[Log[2, top/N[n]]];
res = n], {n, 1, top, 2}];

{maxLen, res}], CompilationTarget -> "C"];

In[377]:= pe14b[10^6] // AbsoluteTiming

Out[377]= {2.396513, {525, 837799}}

For platforms that do not support 64 bit machine integers, one might try to emulate this with machine doubles. EvenQ would have to check whether dividing by two creates a fractional part. The variant below seems to work as it ought.


pe14c = Compile[{{top, _Integer}}, 
Module[{n1, len, maxLen = 0, res = 0.},
Do[n1 = n;

len = 1;
While[n1 != 1,
n1 = If[FractionalPart[n1/2.] == 0, n1/2, 3 n1 + 1];
len++];
If[len > maxLen, maxLen = len + Floor[Log[2, top/n]];
res = n], {n, 1., top, 2.}];
{maxLen, res}], CompilationTarget -> "C"];

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....