Skip to main content

Replacing multiplication of matrix elements by application of these elements as functions


I want to realize the following idea in Mathematica.


I've got a matrix



{{a,b},{c,d}}

which is multiplied to a vector {h,k} leading to


{{a h + b k}, {c h + d k}}.

Imagine now that a is an operator and I want to apply it to h, instead of multiplying. Primitive substitution {a h -> a@h} helps, but it is not quite a good approach while it's not working in more sophisticated cases.


Thank you!


EDIT1: The problem is solved partially, all comments are very useful. But still I am a little bit stacked, so I'm posting the update trying to explain my exact problem.


The problem is following. I want to construct the matrix


{{a[x], b},{c, d}}


where a[x] is an operator (function) and b,c and d are arbitrary expressions (which are symbolic in general). After applying the operation


{{a[x], b},{c, d}}.{{h}, {k}}

I want to obtain


{{a[h] + b k}, {c h + d k}}

I want this operation to work not only for numbers and functions as it was proposed in answers below but with arbitrary symbolic expressions. I mean I want Mathematica to understand that if x and p are not functions but just variables, then x*p means multiplication, otherwise it means x[p].


Moreover I want this operation to work in more general cases, e.g.


{{a[x], b},{c, d}}.M.Transpose[{{a[x], b},{c, d}}], 


where M is an arbitrary matrix.


I would be very grateful for any ideas.



Answer



Picking up on Marius tip on Inner in the comments:


Inner[Apply[#1, {#2}] &, {{a, b}, {c, d}}, {h, k}]

And @ciao offered a better version in comments:


Inner[#1[#2] &, {{a, b}, {c, d}}, {h, k}]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.