Skip to main content

Replacing multiplication of matrix elements by application of these elements as functions


I want to realize the following idea in Mathematica.


I've got a matrix



{{a,b},{c,d}}

which is multiplied to a vector {h,k} leading to


{{a h + b k}, {c h + d k}}.

Imagine now that a is an operator and I want to apply it to h, instead of multiplying. Primitive substitution {a h -> a@h} helps, but it is not quite a good approach while it's not working in more sophisticated cases.


Thank you!


EDIT1: The problem is solved partially, all comments are very useful. But still I am a little bit stacked, so I'm posting the update trying to explain my exact problem.


The problem is following. I want to construct the matrix


{{a[x], b},{c, d}}


where a[x] is an operator (function) and b,c and d are arbitrary expressions (which are symbolic in general). After applying the operation


{{a[x], b},{c, d}}.{{h}, {k}}

I want to obtain


{{a[h] + b k}, {c h + d k}}

I want this operation to work not only for numbers and functions as it was proposed in answers below but with arbitrary symbolic expressions. I mean I want Mathematica to understand that if x and p are not functions but just variables, then x*p means multiplication, otherwise it means x[p].


Moreover I want this operation to work in more general cases, e.g.


{{a[x], b},{c, d}}.M.Transpose[{{a[x], b},{c, d}}], 


where M is an arbitrary matrix.


I would be very grateful for any ideas.



Answer



Picking up on Marius tip on Inner in the comments:


Inner[Apply[#1, {#2}] &, {{a, b}, {c, d}}, {h, k}]

And @ciao offered a better version in comments:


Inner[#1[#2] &, {{a, b}, {c, d}}, {h, k}]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...