Skip to main content

How to use custom Dynamic inside Manipulate


I was wondering if it is possible to use a custom Dynamic[var, function] inside a Manipulate. The reason for the need is this:


Suppose you have a time consuming computation like


timeConsuming[x_] := (Pause[1]; x)

and you want to use it in a Manipulate. Writing


DynamicModule[{y},
Manipulate[

y = timeConsuming[x]; {x, y, other},
{x, 0, 1},
{other, 0, 1}]
]

entails the following issue: you have to wait for timeConsuming to be computed even when you change other and leave x unmodified. A (simple) solution is to code the dynamic by hand:


DynamicModule[{x = 0, y = timeConsuming[0], other = 0},
Panel@Column[{
Grid[{
{"x", Slider[Dynamic[x, (x = #; y = timeConsuming[x]) &], {0, 1}]},

{"other", Slider[Dynamic[other], {0, 1}]}
}],
Dynamic@{x, y, other}
}]
]

This is feasible, but as a drawback makes you renounce all other Module's conveniences.


I tried coding something like


Module[(* result *), {x, 0, 1, some-suitable-function}]


but had no success in the attempt. A (clean) use of Manipulate would be much appreciated.


Just to summarize, the question is: How can I make some statements be executed only when some specified controls are touched?



Answer



Is this what you're after?


timeConsuming[x_] := (Pause[1]; x);
DynamicModule[{y},
Manipulate[y = timeConsuming[x]; {Dynamic@x, y, Dynamic@other},
{x, 0, 1}, {other, 0, 1},
SynchronousUpdating -> False]
]


SynchronousUpdating -> False keeps the front end from being blocked while timeConsuming is computing, and Dynamic lets different segments be updated. So x and other both update when the sliders are moved, and y is updated one second after x is.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.