Skip to main content

numerical integration - Surface area of intersecting spheres


Given a sphere of radius 1 centered at the origin and $n$ spheres with radii $r_i$ centered at predefined coordinates, $c_i$, in space, I am after the surface area of the unit sphere that is not intersected by any of the surrounding spheres. E.g. given the coordinates


c = {{{1.2,0,0},1}, {{0,-1.7,0},1.2}, {{0.7,1,0},0.9}, {{-0.5,-0.5,-0.5},1}}

I am interested in the (potentially) visible blue surface area in the graphic generated by:


{Blue, Sphere[{0,0,0},1], Red, Sphere[#,#2]&@@@c} // Graphics3D

In principle, I can obtain this area by evaluating the following integral


fun = Function[{t,p}, 

Evaluate[ Times @@
(UnitStep[Total[({Sin[t]*Cos[p],Sin[t]*Sin[p],Cos[t]}-#)^2]-#2^2]& @@@ c)
]
]
NIntegrate[Evaluate[fun[t,p]*Sin[t]], {t,0,Pi}, {p,0,2Pi}] // AbsoluteTiming

However, this approach is slow (in particular for a large numbers of spheres), and has convergence issues.


In an attempt to speed up the integral evaluation, I have devised the following code snippet, which is based on a naive (non-adaptive) application of the trapezoidal rule:


n = 1000;
theta = N@Pi/(n-1)*Range[0,n-1];

phi = 2*N@Pi/(2*n-1)*Range[0,2*n-1];
int1 = ConstantArray[1.,n];
int1[[{1,-1}]] = 0.5;
int2 = ConstantArray[1.,2*n];
int2[[{1,-1}]]=0.5;
(* Calculating ptsT is slow. However, it could be pre-calculated once ... *)
ptsT=Transpose[Outer[{Sin[#]*Cos[#2],Sin[#]*Sin[#2],Cos[#]}&, theta, phi], {3,2,1}];

(
lv = Transpose @

Fold[#1*UnitStep[Total[(ptsT - #2[[1]])^2] - #2[[2]]^2] &,
ConstantArray[1., {2 n, n}], c];
int1.((lv.int2)*Sin[theta]) *Pi/(n - 1) * 2*Pi/(2 n - 1)
) // AbsoluteTiming

How can this calculation be sped up? I am also interested in increasing the number of surrounding spheres to approximately 50.


The following code snippet will generate $n$ spheres, which might be useful in comparing the performance of different approaches:


coords[n_] := Transpose@{
1.1 * Table[
With[{y = (2*i + 1)/n - 1, phi = i*(Pi*(3 - Sqrt[5]))},

{Cos[phi]*#, y, Sin[phi]*#} &[Sqrt[1 - y*y]]
],
{i, 0, n - 1}],
ConstantArray[0.3, n]}

Answer



I don't know your speed or precision requirements but here's an approach that yields a low precision estimate to your 50 sphere problem in a few seconds. It's based on the fact that the surface area of a sphere can be computed via $$\int_0^{2\pi}\int_0^{\pi} \sin(\varphi) \, d\varphi \, d\theta.$$ We'll simply write a test function to determine when a point is close to one of the spheres and use this to restrict the domain of integration.


ctest = Compile[{{phi, _Real}, {theta, _Real}, 
{centers, _Real, 2}, {radii, _Real, 1}},
Module[{p3d, result},
result = 1.0;

p3d = {Cos[theta] Sin[phi], Sin[theta] Sin[phi], Cos[phi]};
Do[If[Norm[p3d - centers[[i]]] < radii[[i]], result = 0.0;
Break[]],
{i, 1, Length[centers]}];
result]];
test[phi_?NumericQ, theta_?NumericQ,
ptsRadii : {{{_, _, _}, _} ..}] :=
ctest[phi, theta, Sequence @@ Transpose[ptsRadii]];
NIntegrate[
Sin[phi] test[phi, theta, coords[50]], {phi, 0, Pi}, {theta, 0, 2 Pi},

Method -> "AdaptiveMonteCarlo", PrecisionGoal -> 2] // AbsoluteTiming

(* Out: {4.800880, 1.72108} *)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...