Skip to main content

numerical integration - Surface area of intersecting spheres


Given a sphere of radius 1 centered at the origin and $n$ spheres with radii $r_i$ centered at predefined coordinates, $c_i$, in space, I am after the surface area of the unit sphere that is not intersected by any of the surrounding spheres. E.g. given the coordinates


c = {{{1.2,0,0},1}, {{0,-1.7,0},1.2}, {{0.7,1,0},0.9}, {{-0.5,-0.5,-0.5},1}}

I am interested in the (potentially) visible blue surface area in the graphic generated by:


{Blue, Sphere[{0,0,0},1], Red, Sphere[#,#2]&@@@c} // Graphics3D

In principle, I can obtain this area by evaluating the following integral


fun = Function[{t,p}, 

Evaluate[ Times @@
(UnitStep[Total[({Sin[t]*Cos[p],Sin[t]*Sin[p],Cos[t]}-#)^2]-#2^2]& @@@ c)
]
]
NIntegrate[Evaluate[fun[t,p]*Sin[t]], {t,0,Pi}, {p,0,2Pi}] // AbsoluteTiming

However, this approach is slow (in particular for a large numbers of spheres), and has convergence issues.


In an attempt to speed up the integral evaluation, I have devised the following code snippet, which is based on a naive (non-adaptive) application of the trapezoidal rule:


n = 1000;
theta = N@Pi/(n-1)*Range[0,n-1];

phi = 2*N@Pi/(2*n-1)*Range[0,2*n-1];
int1 = ConstantArray[1.,n];
int1[[{1,-1}]] = 0.5;
int2 = ConstantArray[1.,2*n];
int2[[{1,-1}]]=0.5;
(* Calculating ptsT is slow. However, it could be pre-calculated once ... *)
ptsT=Transpose[Outer[{Sin[#]*Cos[#2],Sin[#]*Sin[#2],Cos[#]}&, theta, phi], {3,2,1}];

(
lv = Transpose @

Fold[#1*UnitStep[Total[(ptsT - #2[[1]])^2] - #2[[2]]^2] &,
ConstantArray[1., {2 n, n}], c];
int1.((lv.int2)*Sin[theta]) *Pi/(n - 1) * 2*Pi/(2 n - 1)
) // AbsoluteTiming

How can this calculation be sped up? I am also interested in increasing the number of surrounding spheres to approximately 50.


The following code snippet will generate $n$ spheres, which might be useful in comparing the performance of different approaches:


coords[n_] := Transpose@{
1.1 * Table[
With[{y = (2*i + 1)/n - 1, phi = i*(Pi*(3 - Sqrt[5]))},

{Cos[phi]*#, y, Sin[phi]*#} &[Sqrt[1 - y*y]]
],
{i, 0, n - 1}],
ConstantArray[0.3, n]}

Answer



I don't know your speed or precision requirements but here's an approach that yields a low precision estimate to your 50 sphere problem in a few seconds. It's based on the fact that the surface area of a sphere can be computed via $$\int_0^{2\pi}\int_0^{\pi} \sin(\varphi) \, d\varphi \, d\theta.$$ We'll simply write a test function to determine when a point is close to one of the spheres and use this to restrict the domain of integration.


ctest = Compile[{{phi, _Real}, {theta, _Real}, 
{centers, _Real, 2}, {radii, _Real, 1}},
Module[{p3d, result},
result = 1.0;

p3d = {Cos[theta] Sin[phi], Sin[theta] Sin[phi], Cos[phi]};
Do[If[Norm[p3d - centers[[i]]] < radii[[i]], result = 0.0;
Break[]],
{i, 1, Length[centers]}];
result]];
test[phi_?NumericQ, theta_?NumericQ,
ptsRadii : {{{_, _, _}, _} ..}] :=
ctest[phi, theta, Sequence @@ Transpose[ptsRadii]];
NIntegrate[
Sin[phi] test[phi, theta, coords[50]], {phi, 0, Pi}, {theta, 0, 2 Pi},

Method -> "AdaptiveMonteCarlo", PrecisionGoal -> 2] // AbsoluteTiming

(* Out: {4.800880, 1.72108} *)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....