Skip to main content

Compile from String using function arguments


I want to return a Compiled function built from a string that uses values of local variables:


f[x_] := Module[{code},
code = "Compile[{},x,CompilationTarget->\"C\"]";
ToExpression[code]
];


While f[1] is a compiled function, f[1][] yields an error due to x.


Plain use of Compile works:


g[x_] := Module[{},
Compile[{}, x, CompilationTarget -> "C"]
];

with g[1][] returning 1.


Why does the compilation from string not recognize the local variable?


PS: I can work around this by inserting ToString[x,InputForm] into the string, but would like to understand better what happens.


PPS: In the original code, both parameters and code string are more involved.




Answer



I think that J.M.s advice to avoid using strings for that kind of meta-programming is the best answer you can get for that question. Looking up the meta-programming question to gather ideas how you can better tackle your specific problem is certainly worth the effort, for completeness here is his suggestion for your simplified example once more:


f[x_] := Module[{code},
code = Hold[Compile[{}, x, CompilationTarget -> "C"]];
ReleaseHold[code]
];

If you are new to Mathematica or have done similar things in other languages, you might think it is easier to manipulate strings but in Mathematica (and other homoiconic languages) it is in fact easier and much safer to manipulate held expressions. Due to its powerful pattern matcher Mathematica makes many of these tasks quite easy, although it sometimes is a bit tricky to handle evaluation order correctly.


You have also asked why your string approach doesn't work. To understand that you have to understand that at a deeper level a function definition in Mathematica is nothing but a definition of a global replacement rule. So evaluating a function will essentially insert the arguments literally into the RHS of the function definition and then evaluate the result. So you can think of function evaluation of some function definition like:


f[x_]:=Sin[Pi*x]


that f[5] will actually do something like:


ReleaseHold[With[{x=5},Hold[Sin[Pi*x]]]]

or


ReleaseHold[Hold[f[5]] /. f[x_] :> Sin[Pi*x]]

This will even work for any symbol with Hold attributes, as this example illustrates:


f[x_]:=Hold[x]
f[1]


With this picture in mind, it does probably not come as a surprise that inserting into strings does not work. This is one of the many reasons why doing meta-programming with strings is usually not the best solution.


If you really decide to go with strings (which I wouldn't suggest) you should realize that what you actually want to do here is to insert a constant into the code to compile -- when working with strings that is more like filling a string template than actually using a variable. Here is what I would do in that case:


f[x_] := Module[{code},
code = "Compile[{},`x`,CompilationTarget->\"C\"]";
ToExpression[TemplateApply[code, <|"x" -> x|>]]
];

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....