Skip to main content

Triangular numbers boolean function


I read the new book by Paul Wellin Programming in Mathematica. There is an exercise about triangular numbers. (The n-th triangular number is defined as the sum of the integers 1 through n.
They are so named because they can be represented visually by arranging rows of dots in a triangular manner. The first ten triangular numbers are: 1, 3, 6, 10, 15, 21, 28, 36, 45.)


In the solution there are given functions which will give the nth triangular number.



For instance:


f1[n_] := Total[Range[n]]

f2[n_] := Fold[#1 + #2 &, 0, Range[n]]

f3[n_] := Binomial[n + 1, 2]

Regarding the timings, we have f3 > f1 > f2 (using the number 50000005000000 from Wellin's book) (in my laptop t3 = 0.01 sec, t1 = 0.18 sec, t3 = 3.8 sec).


I was thinking about a boolean function that will return true or false, whether the number is triangular or not.


My procedural style approach is:



triangularQ[n_] :=
Module[{y, dy}, For[y = 0; dy = 1, y < n, y += dy++];
If[y == n, Print[True], Print[False]]]

But it does not look so efficient.


Are there other approaches that use functional programming?


It seems good to compare the various solutions (the number 50000005000000 is from Wellin's book).


First the procedural:


In[182]:= triangularQ[50000005000000] // Timing


During evaluation of In[182]:= True

Out[182]= {41.562500, Null}

Aky's


In[185]:= f[x_, n_] := f[x - n, n + 1]; f[0, n_] := True;
f[x_ /; x < 0, n_] := False

In[193]:=
Block[{$IterationLimit = ∞}, f[50000005000000, 1]] // Timing


Out[193]= {114.703125, True}

Eldo's


I coud not get true for


MemberQ[ f2 /@ Range@(10^7), 50000005000000]

in reasonable time (less than $2$ minutes).


Nasser's


In[226]:= triangularQ[50000005000000] // Timing


During evaluation of In[226]:= True

Out[226]= {41.421875, Null}

So the procedural style is not deficient at all :-)!



Answer



Here is another approach (based on $t_n=\frac{n(n+1)}{2}$):


fn[x_] := Mod[Sqrt[1 + 8 x], 2] == 1


For the test example fn[3003] is true:


Just for fun (but factoring extremely large numbers an issue):


an[x_?(# > 0 &)] := 
Abs[# - 2 x/#] & @@ Nearest[Divisors[ 2 x], Sqrt[2 x]] == 1
an[0] := True

Just for illustration (and not proof but are straightforward to show): this is picking from 0,1,...,100 the triangular numbers.


fnf = Pick[Range[0, 100], fn[#] & /@ Range[0, 100]]
anf = Pick[Range[0, 100], an[#] & /@ Range[0, 100]]
tn = Table[j (j + 1)/2, {j, 0, Length[anf] - 1}]

Grid[Prepend[
Transpose[
{tn, fnf, anf}], {"Triangular number", "fn", "an"}],
Frame -> All]

enter image description here


UPDATE


Testing the case in edited question (and using Mr Wizard timeAvg function):


timeAvg[func_] := 
Do[If[# > 0.3, Return[#/5^i]] & @@ Timing@Do[func, {5^i}], {i, 0,

15}]
{timeAvg[#], #} &@fn[50000005000000]

yields:{1.47200*10^-8, True}


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....