Skip to main content

`Part` like `Delete`: How to delete list of columns or arbitrarily deeper levels



On trying to write this answer I reached the frustrating realization that I didn't have an efficient way to delete a list of columns or deeper level components in a simple way as Part gives.


Given


MatrixForm[m = Partition[Partition[Range[4 4 3], 3], 4]]

Mathematica graphics



I can Delete rows {2,3} by


Delete[m, List /@ {2, 3}] // MatrixForm

Mathematica graphics


But to delete the columns or deeper levels I would need to Transpose twice. For instance using something like this


rDelete[m_, row_, col_] := Delete[
Transpose[
Delete[
Transpose[m]
, List /@ col

]
], List /@ row
]

Mathematica graphics


On the other hand to get a Part at any level I can easily use


Part[m, All, {1, 4}, {2, 3}] // MatrixForm

Mathematica graphics


Unfortunately, All and Span are not available for Delete.



Question: How can we delete columns or whole higher levels elegantly and efficiently, as we do with Part?



Answer



You can actually use Part for that:


ClearAll[delete];
delete[expr_, specs___] :=
Module[{copy = expr},
copy[[specs]] = Sequence[];
copy
];


So that for example


delete[m, All, All, 2]

(*
{
{{1, 3}, {4, 6}, {7, 9}, {10, 12}},
{{13, 15}, {16, 18}, {19, 21}, {22, 24}},
{{25, 27}, {28, 30}, {31, 33}, {34, 36}},
{{37, 39}, {40, 42}, {43, 45}, {46, 48}}
}

*)

Note that this is not exactly equivalent to Delete in all cases, since sequence splicing is an evaluation-time effect, so the results will be different if you delete inside held expressions - in which case the method I suggested may not work.


Here is a version that would probably be free of the mentioned flaw, but will be slower:


ClearAll[deleteAlt];
deleteAlt[expr_, specs___] :=
Module[{copy = Hold[expr], tag},
copy[[1, specs]] = tag;
ReleaseHold@Delete[copy, Position[copy, tag]]
];


You can test both on say, Hold[Evaluate[m]], with the spec 1, All, All, 2, to see the difference.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.