Skip to main content

`Part` like `Delete`: How to delete list of columns or arbitrarily deeper levels



On trying to write this answer I reached the frustrating realization that I didn't have an efficient way to delete a list of columns or deeper level components in a simple way as Part gives.


Given


MatrixForm[m = Partition[Partition[Range[4 4 3], 3], 4]]

Mathematica graphics



I can Delete rows {2,3} by


Delete[m, List /@ {2, 3}] // MatrixForm

Mathematica graphics


But to delete the columns or deeper levels I would need to Transpose twice. For instance using something like this


rDelete[m_, row_, col_] := Delete[
Transpose[
Delete[
Transpose[m]
, List /@ col

]
], List /@ row
]

Mathematica graphics


On the other hand to get a Part at any level I can easily use


Part[m, All, {1, 4}, {2, 3}] // MatrixForm

Mathematica graphics


Unfortunately, All and Span are not available for Delete.



Question: How can we delete columns or whole higher levels elegantly and efficiently, as we do with Part?



Answer



You can actually use Part for that:


ClearAll[delete];
delete[expr_, specs___] :=
Module[{copy = expr},
copy[[specs]] = Sequence[];
copy
];


So that for example


delete[m, All, All, 2]

(*
{
{{1, 3}, {4, 6}, {7, 9}, {10, 12}},
{{13, 15}, {16, 18}, {19, 21}, {22, 24}},
{{25, 27}, {28, 30}, {31, 33}, {34, 36}},
{{37, 39}, {40, 42}, {43, 45}, {46, 48}}
}

*)

Note that this is not exactly equivalent to Delete in all cases, since sequence splicing is an evaluation-time effect, so the results will be different if you delete inside held expressions - in which case the method I suggested may not work.


Here is a version that would probably be free of the mentioned flaw, but will be slower:


ClearAll[deleteAlt];
deleteAlt[expr_, specs___] :=
Module[{copy = Hold[expr], tag},
copy[[1, specs]] = tag;
ReleaseHold@Delete[copy, Position[copy, tag]]
];


You can test both on say, Hold[Evaluate[m]], with the spec 1, All, All, 2, to see the difference.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]