Skip to main content

evaluation - Simplifying expression with non-commutating entries


Say I have an expression such as


(a + X)**(b-Y)


where the variables above possess the following commutation relations [a, b] = [a, X] = [a, Y] = [b, X] = [b, Y] = 0 and [X, Y] is nonzero.


I want to use mathematica to expand out these terms. This can be done using the "Distribute" command. The input is


Distribute[(a + X)**(b-Y)]

and the output is


a ** b + a ** (-Y) + X ** b + X ** (-Y).

I now want to simplify this expression using the commutation relations given above. I'm not sure how to go about uploading these commutation relations into mathematica such that this expression can be simplified.



Answer




One way to achieve what is asked in the question, is to introduce an identity id which commutes with all quantities but can be used together with X and Y to efficiently tell NonCommutativeMultiply how to treat scalars a, b, and c:


Clear[id]
id /: NonCommutativeMultiply[id, y_] := y
id /: NonCommutativeMultiply[x_, id] := x

Unprotect[NonCommutativeMultiply];
NonCommutativeMultiply[x___, HoldPattern[Times[id, a_]],
y___] := a NonCommutativeMultiply[x, id, y]
NonCommutativeMultiply[x___, HoldPattern[Times[X, a_]],
y___] := a NonCommutativeMultiply[x, X, y]

NonCommutativeMultiply[x___, HoldPattern[Times[Y, a_]],
y___] := a NonCommutativeMultiply[x, Y, y]
Protect[NonCommutativeMultiply];

In defining the properties of NonCommutativeMultiply, I had to temporarily use UnProtect. The purpose of id is seen in the three last lines: I can now define the linearity of ** under regular multiplication by a scalar a in the same way for the elements id, X and Y. But by specifying that id commutes with X and Y, I designate it as the element that accompanies all scalars a: instead of writing a for a commuting element, you therefore have to write a id.


The benefit of this additional convention is that I don't need to add specific definitions for each individual variable name that is intended to be a scalar. Anything that appears in the form a id or id c etc. is a scalar by definition.


Here is what the example looks like:


Distribute[(a id + X) ** (b id - Y)]

(* ==> a b id + b X - a Y - X ** Y *)


In the result, id again appears in the one term that has only scalars in it.


To make the definitions even shorter, you could replace all three lines between Unprotect and Protect by this:


NonCommutativeMultiply[x___,HoldPattern[Times[p:(id|X|Y),a_]],y___]:=
a NonCommutativeMultiply[x,p,y]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]