Skip to main content

evaluation - Simplifying expression with non-commutating entries


Say I have an expression such as


(a + X)**(b-Y)


where the variables above possess the following commutation relations [a, b] = [a, X] = [a, Y] = [b, X] = [b, Y] = 0 and [X, Y] is nonzero.


I want to use mathematica to expand out these terms. This can be done using the "Distribute" command. The input is


Distribute[(a + X)**(b-Y)]

and the output is


a ** b + a ** (-Y) + X ** b + X ** (-Y).

I now want to simplify this expression using the commutation relations given above. I'm not sure how to go about uploading these commutation relations into mathematica such that this expression can be simplified.



Answer




One way to achieve what is asked in the question, is to introduce an identity id which commutes with all quantities but can be used together with X and Y to efficiently tell NonCommutativeMultiply how to treat scalars a, b, and c:


Clear[id]
id /: NonCommutativeMultiply[id, y_] := y
id /: NonCommutativeMultiply[x_, id] := x

Unprotect[NonCommutativeMultiply];
NonCommutativeMultiply[x___, HoldPattern[Times[id, a_]],
y___] := a NonCommutativeMultiply[x, id, y]
NonCommutativeMultiply[x___, HoldPattern[Times[X, a_]],
y___] := a NonCommutativeMultiply[x, X, y]

NonCommutativeMultiply[x___, HoldPattern[Times[Y, a_]],
y___] := a NonCommutativeMultiply[x, Y, y]
Protect[NonCommutativeMultiply];

In defining the properties of NonCommutativeMultiply, I had to temporarily use UnProtect. The purpose of id is seen in the three last lines: I can now define the linearity of ** under regular multiplication by a scalar a in the same way for the elements id, X and Y. But by specifying that id commutes with X and Y, I designate it as the element that accompanies all scalars a: instead of writing a for a commuting element, you therefore have to write a id.


The benefit of this additional convention is that I don't need to add specific definitions for each individual variable name that is intended to be a scalar. Anything that appears in the form a id or id c etc. is a scalar by definition.


Here is what the example looks like:


Distribute[(a id + X) ** (b id - Y)]

(* ==> a b id + b X - a Y - X ** Y *)


In the result, id again appears in the one term that has only scalars in it.


To make the definitions even shorter, you could replace all three lines between Unprotect and Protect by this:


NonCommutativeMultiply[x___,HoldPattern[Times[p:(id|X|Y),a_]],y___]:=
a NonCommutativeMultiply[x,p,y]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...