Skip to main content

manipulate - trouble with Dynamic range in SetterBar


It appears that I can set the range to a Dynamic variable in a Manipulate control, but not in a SetterBar control? :


Manipulate[
tick;
Dynamic@If[ tabNumber == dynTab, Plot[ x^2, {x, 0, 1}],

Plot[ 1 - x^2, {x, 0, 1}]]
, TabView[ {
"dynamic range" -> Column[ tabNumber = dynTab ; {
Row[{Manipulator[
Dynamic[m2, (m2 = #; tick = Not[tick]) &], {2, Dynamic@range,
2}], " ", Dynamic[m2] }],
Row[{SetterBar[Dynamic[s2, (s2 = #; tick = Not[tick]) &],
Range[Dynamic@range]], " ", Dynamic[s1] }]
}],
"static range" -> Column[ tabNumber = staticTab ; {

Row[{Manipulator[
Dynamic[m1, (m1 = #; tick = Not[tick]) &], {2, 8, 2}], " ",
Dynamic[m1] }],
Row[{SetterBar[Dynamic[s1, (s1 = #; tick = Not[tick]) &],
Range[8]], " ", Dynamic[s1] }]
}]
}, Dynamic @tabNumber ]
, {{tick, False}, None}
, {{tabNumber, 1}, None}, {{dynTab, 1}, None}, {{staticTab, 2}, None}
, {{m1, 2}, None}, {{m2, 2}, None}, {{s1, 2}, None}, {{s2, 2}, None}

, {{range, 8}, None}
, TrackedSymbols :> {tick}, ControlPlacement -> Left
]

This produces an error 'Range::range: "Range specification in Range[range] does not have appropriate bounds. "':


Range error


Observe that the Manipulate in the same tab that uses a Dynamic range works fine. The other tab (not shown in the image) that uses static ranges is fine (for both Manipulate and SetterBar)?


[EDIT:]


Nasser suggested Evaluate@With[{range = ...}, ...], which assumed range was constant, as in the example above. Here's an example that is more representitive of what I'm attempting to do (with range based on the count of the number of Locators in a LocatorPane, which can be added with Alt-Click in that pane).


Manipulate[tick;

If[tabNumber == dynTab, Plot[x^2, {x, 0, 1}],
Plot[1 - x^2, {x, 0, 1}]]
, TabView[{
"use n-loc as range" -> Column[tabNumber = dynTab; {
"dynamic range manipulators:",
Row[{Manipulator[Dynamic[m2, (m2 = #; tick = Not[tick]) &],
Dynamic@{1, 2 range}], " ", Dynamic[m2]}],
Row[{SetterBar[Dynamic[s2, (s2 = #; tick = Not[tick]) &],
Dynamic@Range[range]], " ", Dynamic[s1]}],
"static range manipulators:",

Row[{Manipulator[
Dynamic[m1, (m1 = #; tick = Not[tick]) &], {1, 4}], " ",
Dynamic[m1]}],
Row[{SetterBar[Dynamic[s1, (s1 = #; tick = Not[tick]) &],
Range[4]], " ", Dynamic[s1]}]
}],
"loc" -> Column[tabNumber = staticTab; {
LocatorPane[ Dynamic[u, (
u = # ;
range = (Dimensions[u] // First);

tick = Not[tick]) &],
Plot[x^3, {x, -1, 1}, PlotRange -> {{-1, 1}, {-1, 1}}],
LocatorAutoCreate -> True,
ContinuousAction -> False
]
, Row[{"u = ", Dynamic@u}]
}]
}, Dynamic@tabNumber]
, {{tick, False}, None}
, {{u, {{0.5, 0.3}, {0.3, 0.9}}}, None}

, {{tabNumber, 1}, None} , {{dynTab, 1}, None} , {{staticTab, 2}, None}
, {{m1, 2}, None} , {{m2, 2}, None} , {{s1, 2}, None} , {{s2, 2}, None}
, {{range, 2}, None}
, TrackedSymbols :> {tick}, ControlPlacement -> Left
(*use a global (comment out range above to try) ... doesn't work: *)
(*, Initialization\[RuleDelayed] { range = 2 ; }*)
]

In this example, I put the Dynamic outside of the Range expression. This eliminates the error text, but still doesn't work. The SetterBar shows up as text: SetterBar[2, {1,2}]



Answer




Dynamic[SetterBar[Dynamic[s2, (s2 = #; tick = Not[tick]) &], Range[range]], 
TrackedSymbols :> {range}]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

functions - What best practices or performance considerations are there for choosing between Cases, Position, Pick and Select?

Cases , Select , Pick and Position each have different syntaxes and purposes, but there are times when you can express the same calculation equivalently using either of them. So with this input: test = RandomInteger[{-25, 25}, {20, 2}] {{-15, 13}, {-8, 16}, {-8, -19}, {7, 6}, {-21, 9}, {-3, -25}, {21, -18}, {4, 4}, {2, -2}, {-24, 8}, {-17, -8}, {4, -18}, {22, -24}, {-4, -3}, {21, 0}, {19, 18}, {-23, -8}, {23, -25}, {14, -2}, {-1, -13}} You can get the following equivalent results: Cases[test, {_, _?Positive}] {{-15, 13}, {-8, 16}, {7, 6}, {-21, 9}, {4, 4}, {-24, 8}, {19, 18}} Select[test, #[[2]] > 0 &] {{-15, 13}, {-8, 16}, {7, 6}, {-21, 9}, {4, 4}, {-24, 8}, {19, 18}} Pick[test, Sign[test[[All, 2]] ], 1] {{-15, 13}, {-8, 16}, {7, 6}, {-21, 9}, {4, 4}, {-24, 8}, {19, 18}} test[[Flatten@Position[test[[All, 2]], _?Positive] ]] {{-15, 13}, {-8, 16}, {7, 6}, {-21, 9}, {4, 4}, {-24, 8}, {19, 18}} Are there performance or other considerations that should guide which you shou...