Skip to main content

Any solution to system of equations?


I need ANY combination of 8 variables which satisfy:


a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h=0
a^2+b^2+c^2+d^2+e^2+f^2+g^2+h^2=1
a*b+b*c+c*d+d*e+e*f+f*g+g*h+a*h>2/3


Ideally these would be numbers having simple closed forms...


If I exchange third restriction with


a*b+b*c+c*d+d*e+e*f+f*g+g*h+a*h=2/3

I get a solution a=b=c=6^(-0.5); e=f=g=-6^(-0.5); d=h=0;



Answer



This is a special kind of problem which succumbs to a standard approach.


Analysis


The question can be solved by maximizing $x \mathbb{A} x'$ and checking that this maximum exceeds $2/3$. The restrictions are (1) that $x=(a,b,\ldots,h)$ must have unit square length and (2) be orthogonal to $e_1 = (1,1,\ldots, 1)$, where $A$ is the matrix


$$\left( \begin{array}{cccccccc} 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \end{array} \right)$$



Solution


Because $\mathbb{A}$ is obviously a rotation matrix (it represents a cyclic permutation of the eight basis vectors), $e_1$ (by virtue of its constant coefficients) must be an eigenvector. Seven other complex eigenvectors can be found orthogonal to $e_1$. Their eigenvalues fall into three groups of complex conjugates, representing rotations by primitive multiples of $2\pi/8$, and one real eigenvalue of $-1$, representing a rotation by $\pi$. We seek the smallest rotation among these rotations, because that corresponds to the largest cosine of the angle, which geometrically is what $x\mathbb{A} x'$ is computing.


The eigensystem can be obtained and displayed as


MatrixForm /@ ({e, ev} = Eigensystem[a = RotateRight[#, 1] & /@ IdentityMatrix[8]] // Simplify)

The cosines are the real parts of the eigenvalues e:


Re[e]


$\left\{-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}},-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}},\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}},\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}},-1,0,0,1\right\}$




The two largest real parts, $1/\sqrt{2}\approx 0.7071 \gt 2/3$, occur in the third and fourth places. The real parts of either the third or fourth normalized eigenvectors therefore afford values of $x$ where the desired maximum is attained:


x = Normalize @ (Re /@ ev[[3]]) 


$\left\{\frac{1}{2 \sqrt{2}},0,-\frac{1}{2 \sqrt{2}},-\frac{1}{2},-\frac{1}{2 \sqrt{2}},0,\frac{1}{2 \sqrt{2}},\frac{1}{2}\right\}$



If any of this seems too abstract, let's check all the requirements:





  1. Confirm $x$ is orthogonal to $e_1$:


    x .ConstantArray[1, 8]


    $0$





  2. Confirm $x$ has unit squared length:


    x . x



    $1$





  3. Compute $x\mathbb{A} x'$:


    x . a . x



    $\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}$





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

list manipulation - Selecting multiple columns from a matrix?

Sample data: data = { {{2013, 1, 1}, 24.13, 167.67, 231.82}, {{2013, 1, 2}, 32.15, 170.92, 225.99}, {{2013, 1, 3}, 35.43, 172.68, 221.67}, {{2013, 1, 4}, 36.73, 173.05, 218.32}, {{2013, 1, 5}, 58.19, 165.96, 197.05}, {{2013, 1, 6}, 69.99, 163.50, 187.52}, {{2013, 1, 7}, 71.37, 154.21, 175.58}, {{2013, 1, 8}, 72.51, 149.66, 163.25}}; I want a DateListPlot with three graphs, so for a matrix formed by columns 1 and 2, one for columns 1 and 3, and 1 for columns 1 and 4. At the moment I'm using this code: data2 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 2]]}]; data3 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 3]]}]; data4 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 4]]}]; DateListPlot[{data2, data3, data4}, Joined -> True, Filling -> {3 -> {1}}] but I have a hunch that this can be done more efficiently. I don't like the Transpose s in particular. Any ideas? edit (for extra credit) What if I need to multiply the second column by 2, which in my solution is simp...