Skip to main content

Any solution to system of equations?


I need ANY combination of 8 variables which satisfy:


a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h=0
a^2+b^2+c^2+d^2+e^2+f^2+g^2+h^2=1
a*b+b*c+c*d+d*e+e*f+f*g+g*h+a*h>2/3


Ideally these would be numbers having simple closed forms...


If I exchange third restriction with


a*b+b*c+c*d+d*e+e*f+f*g+g*h+a*h=2/3

I get a solution a=b=c=6^(-0.5); e=f=g=-6^(-0.5); d=h=0;



Answer



This is a special kind of problem which succumbs to a standard approach.


Analysis


The question can be solved by maximizing $x \mathbb{A} x'$ and checking that this maximum exceeds $2/3$. The restrictions are (1) that $x=(a,b,\ldots,h)$ must have unit square length and (2) be orthogonal to $e_1 = (1,1,\ldots, 1)$, where $A$ is the matrix


$$\left( \begin{array}{cccccccc} 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \end{array} \right)$$



Solution


Because $\mathbb{A}$ is obviously a rotation matrix (it represents a cyclic permutation of the eight basis vectors), $e_1$ (by virtue of its constant coefficients) must be an eigenvector. Seven other complex eigenvectors can be found orthogonal to $e_1$. Their eigenvalues fall into three groups of complex conjugates, representing rotations by primitive multiples of $2\pi/8$, and one real eigenvalue of $-1$, representing a rotation by $\pi$. We seek the smallest rotation among these rotations, because that corresponds to the largest cosine of the angle, which geometrically is what $x\mathbb{A} x'$ is computing.


The eigensystem can be obtained and displayed as


MatrixForm /@ ({e, ev} = Eigensystem[a = RotateRight[#, 1] & /@ IdentityMatrix[8]] // Simplify)

The cosines are the real parts of the eigenvalues e:


Re[e]


$\left\{-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}},-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}},\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}},\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}},-1,0,0,1\right\}$




The two largest real parts, $1/\sqrt{2}\approx 0.7071 \gt 2/3$, occur in the third and fourth places. The real parts of either the third or fourth normalized eigenvectors therefore afford values of $x$ where the desired maximum is attained:


x = Normalize @ (Re /@ ev[[3]]) 


$\left\{\frac{1}{2 \sqrt{2}},0,-\frac{1}{2 \sqrt{2}},-\frac{1}{2},-\frac{1}{2 \sqrt{2}},0,\frac{1}{2 \sqrt{2}},\frac{1}{2}\right\}$



If any of this seems too abstract, let's check all the requirements:





  1. Confirm $x$ is orthogonal to $e_1$:


    x .ConstantArray[1, 8]


    $0$





  2. Confirm $x$ has unit squared length:


    x . x



    $1$





  3. Compute $x\mathbb{A} x'$:


    x . a . x



    $\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}$





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....