Skip to main content

equation solving - Apart for complex roots?


Let p[x] be a polynomial in x and consider the partial fraction decomposition of 1/p[x].


The function Apart[] fails in simple cases like this



Apart[1/(1 + x^2)]

(* Out[37]= 1/(1 + x^2) *)

We could define a function


cApart[invp_] := Module[{z, c},
   z = x /. Solve[0 == 1/invp, x];
   c[k_] := 
    Product[If[i != k, 1/(z[[k]] - z[[i]]), 1], {i, 1, Length[z]}];
   Sum[c[i]/(x - z[[i]]), {i, 1, Length[z]}]];


which does the job


cApart[1/(1 + x^2)]

(* Out[36] = -(I/(2 (-I + x))) + I/(2 (I + x)) *)

But my question: is there an option for Apart[] or another standard facility in Mathematica which gives the decomposition in general, i.e. in the complex domain?


EDIT #1.1 Standard solution using Extension


The hints given so far can be codensed in this example


With[{d = 1 + x + x^2}, 

 Apart[1/Factor[d, Extension -> (x /. Solve[d == 0, x])]]]

(* -(1/((-1 + 2 (-1)^(1/3)) (-1 + (-1)^(1/3) - x))) - 1/((-1 + 
    2 (-1)^(1/3)) ((-1)^(1/3) + x)) *)

But it turns out that this procedure is not useful in practical applications as it takes extremely long calculation times (e.g. 1+x+x^4 took to Long to wait for it).


The following form (or something similar) would be nice to have


Apart[1/p[x], Extension -> Complexes] (* proposal, not available *)

EDIT #1.2 Other applications of cApart



It is interesting to apply cApart to a polynomial of higher degree


cApart[1/(1 + x + x^6)]

(* 
Out[64]= 
 1/((x - Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 1]) (Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 1] -
       Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 2]) (Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 1] - 
      Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 3]) (Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 1] - 
      Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 4]) (Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 1] - 
      Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 5]) (Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 1] - 

      Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 6])) + 
 1/((x - Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 2]) (-Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 1] + 
      Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 2]) (Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 2] - 
      Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 3]) (Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 2] - 
      Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 4]) (Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 2] - 
      Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 5]) (Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 2] - 
      Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 6])) + 
 1/((x - Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 3]) (-Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 1] + 
      Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 3]) (-Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 2] + 
      Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 3]) (Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 3] - 

      Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 4]) (Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 3] - 
      Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 5]) (Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 3] - 
      Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 6])) + 
 1/((x - Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 4]) (-Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 1] + 
      Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 4]) (-Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 2] + 
      Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 4]) (-Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 3] + 
      Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 4]) (Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 4] - 
      Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 5]) (Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 4] - 
      Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 6])) + 
 1/((x - Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 5]) (-Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 1] + 

      Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 5]) (-Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 2] + 
      Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 5]) (-Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 3] + 
      Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 5]) (-Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 4] + 
      Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 5]) (Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 5] - 
      Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 6])) + 
 1/((x - Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 6]) (-Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 1] + 
      Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 6]) (-Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 2] + 
      Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 6]) (-Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 3] + 
      Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 6]) (-Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 4] + 
      Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 6]) (-Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 5] + 

      Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 6]))
*)

Which gives the solution in a very regular pattern involving the function Root[]. The numeric evaluation gives


% // N

(*
Out[65]= -((
  0.0965468 + 0.0295033 I)/((-0.945402 - 0.611837 I) + x)) - (
 0.0965468 - 0.0295033 I)/((-0.945402 + 0.611837 I) + x) - (

 0.084438 + 0.114801 I)/((0.154735 - 1.03838 I) + x) - (
 0.084438 - 0.114801 I)/((0.154735 + 1.03838 I) + x) + (
 0.180985 - 0.279696 I)/((0.790667 - 0.300507 I) + x) + (
 0.180985 + 0.279696 I)/((0.790667 + 0.300507 I) + x)
*)

We can even continue to use these symbolic Root[] expressions in more complicated environments such as


g[a_] = Integrate[
  Exp[-a x]/(x - Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 1]), {x, 0, \[Infinity]}, 
  Assumptions -> a > 0]


(* Out[69]= E^(-a Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 1]) (-I \[Pi] - 
   CoshIntegral[a Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 1]] - 
   SinhIntegral[a Root[1 + #1 + #1^6 &, 1]]) *)

It is gratifying that the integral is evaluated symbolically. We can now easily calculate numerical values, e.g.


g[1.]


(* Out[70]= 0.653737 - 0.158332 I *)


Regards,
Wolfgang





Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...
Post a Comment
Read more

How to thread a list

I have data in format data = {{a1, a2}, {b1, b2}, {c1, c2}, {d1, d2}} Tableform: I want to thread it to : tdata = {{{a1, b1}, {a2, b2}}, {{a1, c1}, {a2, c2}}, {{a1, d1}, {a2, d2}}} Tableform: And I would like to do better then pseudofunction[n_] := Transpose[{data2[[1]], data2[[n]]}]; SetAttributes[pseudofunction, Listable]; Range[2, 4] // pseudofunction Here is my benchmark data, where data3 is normal sample of real data. data3 = Drop[ExcelWorkBook[[Column1 ;; Column4]], None, 1]; data2 = {a #, b #, c #, d #} & /@ Range[1, 10^5]; data = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {10^6, 4}]; Here is my benchmark code kptnw[list_] := Transpose[{Table[First@#, {Length@# - 1}], Rest@#}, {3, 1, 2}] &@list kptnw2[list_] := Transpose[{ConstantArray[First@#, Length@# - 1], Rest@#}, {3, 1, 2}] &@list OleksandrR[list_] := Flatten[Outer[List, List@First[list], Rest[list], 1], {{2}, {1, 4}}] paradox2[list_] := Partition[Riffle[list[[1]], #], 2] & /@ Drop[list, 1] RM[list_] := FoldList[Transpose[{First@li...
Post a Comment
Read more

front end - keyboard shortcut to invoke Insert new matrix

I frequently need to type in some matrices, and the menu command Insert > Table/Matrix > New... allows matrices with lines drawn between columns and rows, which is very helpful. I would like to make a keyboard shortcut for it, but cannot find the relevant frontend token command (4209405) for it. Since the FullForm[] and InputForm[] of matrices with lines drawn between rows and columns is the same as those without lines, it's hard to do this via 3rd party system-wide text expanders (e.g. autohotkey or atext on mac). How does one assign a keyboard shortcut for the menu item Insert > Table/Matrix > New... , preferably using only mathematica? Thanks! Answer In the MenuSetup.tr (for linux located in the $InstallationDirectory/SystemFiles/FrontEnd/TextResources/X/ directory), I changed the line MenuItem["&New...", "CreateGridBoxDialog"] to read MenuItem["&New...", "CreateGridBoxDialog", MenuKey["m", Modifiers-...
Post a Comment
Read more