Skip to main content

list manipulation - How to use Reap and Sow instead of Append to


I have matrix and and i want to do increment in a do loop and and i want to store in list using append to. It works fine for less values, But when i want to do it for values around 1 million the program is slow.


 x = {{0.1},{0.2}};xm = {{0.4},{0.5}};
Do[datax[i] = {}; dataxm[i] = {};, {i, 1, 2}]


Do[
x = x + t;
xm = xm + t;
Do[AppendTo[datax[i], Flatten[{t, x[[i]]}]];, {i, 1, 2}];
Do[AppendTo[dataxm[i], Flatten[{t, xm[[i]]}]];, {i, 1, 2}], {t, 0, 1, 0.1}]


datax[1]


{{0., 0.1}, {0.1, 0.2}, {0.2, 0.4}, {0.3, 0.7}, {0.4, 1.1}, {0.5, 1.6}, {0.6, 2.2}, {0.7, 2.9}, {0.8, 3.7}, {0.9, 4.6}, {1., 5.6}}

datax[2]

{{0., 0.2}, {0.1, 0.3}, {0.2, 0.5}, {0.3, 0.8}, {0.4, 1.2}, {0.5,
1.7}, {0.6, 2.3}, {0.7, 3.}, {0.8, 3.8}, {0.9, 4.7}, {1., 5.7}}

dataxm[1]

{{0., 0.4}, {0.1, 0.5}, {0.2, 0.7}, {0.3, 1.}, {0.4,

1.4}, {0.5, 1.9}, {0.6, 2.5}, {0.7, 3.2}, {0.8, 4.}, {0.9,
4.9}, {1., 5.9}}

dataxm[2]

{{0., 0.5}, {0.1, 0.6}, {0.2, 0.8}, {0.3, 1.1}, {0.4,
1.5}, {0.5, 2.}, {0.6, 2.6}, {0.7, 3.3}, {0.8, 4.1}, {0.9, 5.}, {1.,
6.}}

Similar to the above I want to use reap and sow functions to speed it up but i can store only the last value. Why?



 x = {{0.1},{0.2}};xm = {{0.4},{0.5}};


Do[
x = x + t;xm = xm + t;

Do[datax[i] = Reap[Sow[{t, x[[i]]}]][[2, 1]], {i, 1, 2}];

Do[dataxm[i] = Reap[Sow[{t, xm[[i]]}]][[2, 1]], {i, 1, 2}];



, {t, 0, 1, 0.1}]

datax[1]
{{1., {5.6}}}

datax[2]
{{1., {5.7}}}



datax[1]
{{1., {5.9}}}

datax[2]
{{1., {6.0}}

Can anyone help in fixing this issue? Thanks in advance



Answer



You need olny one Reap for all Sows -- that's primarily the advantage of using them.


Moreover, you may use tags to obtain datax[1] and datax[2]:



x = {{0.1}, {0.2}};
ClearAll[datax];
datax = Association@Reap[
Do[
x = x + t;
Do[
Sow[
Flatten[{t, x[[tag]]}],
tag
],

{tag, 1, 2}],
{t, 0, 1, 0.1}],
_, Rule][[2]]


<|1 -> {{0., 0.1}, {0.1, 0.2}, {0.2, 0.4}, {0.3, 0.7}, {0.4, 1.1}, {0.5, 1.6}, {0.6, 2.2}, {0.7, 2.9}, {0.8, 3.7}, {0.9, 4.6}, {1., 5.6}}, 2 -> {{0., 0.2}, {0.1, 0.3}, {0.2, 0.5}, {0.3, 0.8}, {0.4, 1.2}, {0.5, 1.7}, {0.6, 2.3}, {0.7, 3.}, {0.8, 3.8}, {0.9, 4.7}, {1., 5.7}}|>



Now you can access datax[1] and datax[2] as before.



Because the question changed: This should allow you to assemble more than one list in one go:



data = Merge[
Reap[
Do[
x = x + t;
xm = xm + t;
Do[
Sow[Flatten[{t, x[[i]]}], "datax" -> i];
Sow[Flatten[{t, xm[[i]]}], "dataxm" -> i]
,
{i, 1, 2}], {t, 0, 1, 0.1}],

_, #1[[1]] -> Association[#1[[2]] -> #2] &][[2]]
, Association
];

Now data["datax"] and data["dataxm"] should behave like datax and dataxm.



You can obtain essentially the same result much more efficiently with arrays produced by Table:


x = {0.1, 0.2};
xm = {0.4, 0.5};
{datax, dataxm} = Transpose[

Table[{{{t, t}, x += t}, {{t, t}, xm += t}}, {t, 0, 1, 0.1}],
{3, 1, 4, 2}];

Now you have (notice the double brackets):


datax[[1]]
datax[[2]]
dataxm[[1]]
dataxm[[2]]



Even faster for this particular problem is to avoid cursive addition and to use vectorized operations.


The Reap/Sow method from above:


n = 1000000;

x = {0.1, 0.2};
xm = {0.4, 0.5};
First@AbsoluteTiming[
data = Merge[
Reap[
Do[

x = x + t;
xm = xm + t;
Do[
Sow[Flatten[{t, x[[i]]}], "datax" -> i];
Sow[Flatten[{t, xm[[i]]}], "dataxm" -> i]
,
{i, 1, 2}], {t, 0., 1., 1./n}],
_, #1[[1]] -> Association[#1[[2]] -> #2] &][[2]]
, Association
];

]


11.4845



The Table method from above:


x = {0.1, 0.2};
xm = {0.4, 0.5};
First@AbsoluteTiming[
{datax, dataxm} =

Transpose[
Table[{{{t, t}, x += t}, {{t, t}, xm += t}}, {t, 0., 1.,
1./n}], {3, 1, 4, 2}];
]


2.74062



Vectorized version:


x = {0.1, 0.2};

xm = {0.4, 0.5};
First@AbsoluteTiming[
tlist = Subdivide[0., 1., n];
slist = Accumulate[tlist];
datax2 = {
Transpose[{tlist, x[[1]] + slist}],
Transpose[{tlist, x[[2]] + slist}]
};
dataxm2 = {
Transpose[{tlist, xm[[1]] + slist}],

Transpose[{tlist, xm[[2]] + slist}]
};
]


0.061355



So, the latter is 44/187 time faster than the other methods. So you should take these considerations into account when using Reap and Sow.


Errors:


Max[Abs[data["datax"][1] - datax[[1]]]]

Max[Abs[data["datax"][2] - datax[[2]]]]
Max[Abs[data["dataxm"][1] - dataxm[[1]]]]
Max[Abs[data["dataxm"][2] - dataxm[[2]]]]
Max[Abs[datax - datax2]]
Max[Abs[dataxm - dataxm2]]


0.


0.


0.



0.


5.82077*10^-11


5.82077*10^-11



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

list manipulation - Selecting multiple columns from a matrix?

Sample data: data = { {{2013, 1, 1}, 24.13, 167.67, 231.82}, {{2013, 1, 2}, 32.15, 170.92, 225.99}, {{2013, 1, 3}, 35.43, 172.68, 221.67}, {{2013, 1, 4}, 36.73, 173.05, 218.32}, {{2013, 1, 5}, 58.19, 165.96, 197.05}, {{2013, 1, 6}, 69.99, 163.50, 187.52}, {{2013, 1, 7}, 71.37, 154.21, 175.58}, {{2013, 1, 8}, 72.51, 149.66, 163.25}}; I want a DateListPlot with three graphs, so for a matrix formed by columns 1 and 2, one for columns 1 and 3, and 1 for columns 1 and 4. At the moment I'm using this code: data2 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 2]]}]; data3 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 3]]}]; data4 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 4]]}]; DateListPlot[{data2, data3, data4}, Joined -> True, Filling -> {3 -> {1}}] but I have a hunch that this can be done more efficiently. I don't like the Transpose s in particular. Any ideas? edit (for extra credit) What if I need to multiply the second column by 2, which in my solution is simp...