Skip to main content

list manipulation - How to use Reap and Sow instead of Append to


I have matrix and and i want to do increment in a do loop and and i want to store in list using append to. It works fine for less values, But when i want to do it for values around 1 million the program is slow.


 x = {{0.1},{0.2}};xm = {{0.4},{0.5}};
Do[datax[i] = {}; dataxm[i] = {};, {i, 1, 2}]


Do[
x = x + t;
xm = xm + t;
Do[AppendTo[datax[i], Flatten[{t, x[[i]]}]];, {i, 1, 2}];
Do[AppendTo[dataxm[i], Flatten[{t, xm[[i]]}]];, {i, 1, 2}], {t, 0, 1, 0.1}]


datax[1]


{{0., 0.1}, {0.1, 0.2}, {0.2, 0.4}, {0.3, 0.7}, {0.4, 1.1}, {0.5, 1.6}, {0.6, 2.2}, {0.7, 2.9}, {0.8, 3.7}, {0.9, 4.6}, {1., 5.6}}

datax[2]

{{0., 0.2}, {0.1, 0.3}, {0.2, 0.5}, {0.3, 0.8}, {0.4, 1.2}, {0.5,
1.7}, {0.6, 2.3}, {0.7, 3.}, {0.8, 3.8}, {0.9, 4.7}, {1., 5.7}}

dataxm[1]

{{0., 0.4}, {0.1, 0.5}, {0.2, 0.7}, {0.3, 1.}, {0.4,

1.4}, {0.5, 1.9}, {0.6, 2.5}, {0.7, 3.2}, {0.8, 4.}, {0.9,
4.9}, {1., 5.9}}

dataxm[2]

{{0., 0.5}, {0.1, 0.6}, {0.2, 0.8}, {0.3, 1.1}, {0.4,
1.5}, {0.5, 2.}, {0.6, 2.6}, {0.7, 3.3}, {0.8, 4.1}, {0.9, 5.}, {1.,
6.}}

Similar to the above I want to use reap and sow functions to speed it up but i can store only the last value. Why?



 x = {{0.1},{0.2}};xm = {{0.4},{0.5}};


Do[
x = x + t;xm = xm + t;

Do[datax[i] = Reap[Sow[{t, x[[i]]}]][[2, 1]], {i, 1, 2}];

Do[dataxm[i] = Reap[Sow[{t, xm[[i]]}]][[2, 1]], {i, 1, 2}];



, {t, 0, 1, 0.1}]

datax[1]
{{1., {5.6}}}

datax[2]
{{1., {5.7}}}



datax[1]
{{1., {5.9}}}

datax[2]
{{1., {6.0}}

Can anyone help in fixing this issue? Thanks in advance



Answer



You need olny one Reap for all Sows -- that's primarily the advantage of using them.


Moreover, you may use tags to obtain datax[1] and datax[2]:



x = {{0.1}, {0.2}};
ClearAll[datax];
datax = Association@Reap[
Do[
x = x + t;
Do[
Sow[
Flatten[{t, x[[tag]]}],
tag
],

{tag, 1, 2}],
{t, 0, 1, 0.1}],
_, Rule][[2]]


<|1 -> {{0., 0.1}, {0.1, 0.2}, {0.2, 0.4}, {0.3, 0.7}, {0.4, 1.1}, {0.5, 1.6}, {0.6, 2.2}, {0.7, 2.9}, {0.8, 3.7}, {0.9, 4.6}, {1., 5.6}}, 2 -> {{0., 0.2}, {0.1, 0.3}, {0.2, 0.5}, {0.3, 0.8}, {0.4, 1.2}, {0.5, 1.7}, {0.6, 2.3}, {0.7, 3.}, {0.8, 3.8}, {0.9, 4.7}, {1., 5.7}}|>



Now you can access datax[1] and datax[2] as before.



Because the question changed: This should allow you to assemble more than one list in one go:



data = Merge[
Reap[
Do[
x = x + t;
xm = xm + t;
Do[
Sow[Flatten[{t, x[[i]]}], "datax" -> i];
Sow[Flatten[{t, xm[[i]]}], "dataxm" -> i]
,
{i, 1, 2}], {t, 0, 1, 0.1}],

_, #1[[1]] -> Association[#1[[2]] -> #2] &][[2]]
, Association
];

Now data["datax"] and data["dataxm"] should behave like datax and dataxm.



You can obtain essentially the same result much more efficiently with arrays produced by Table:


x = {0.1, 0.2};
xm = {0.4, 0.5};
{datax, dataxm} = Transpose[

Table[{{{t, t}, x += t}, {{t, t}, xm += t}}, {t, 0, 1, 0.1}],
{3, 1, 4, 2}];

Now you have (notice the double brackets):


datax[[1]]
datax[[2]]
dataxm[[1]]
dataxm[[2]]



Even faster for this particular problem is to avoid cursive addition and to use vectorized operations.


The Reap/Sow method from above:


n = 1000000;

x = {0.1, 0.2};
xm = {0.4, 0.5};
First@AbsoluteTiming[
data = Merge[
Reap[
Do[

x = x + t;
xm = xm + t;
Do[
Sow[Flatten[{t, x[[i]]}], "datax" -> i];
Sow[Flatten[{t, xm[[i]]}], "dataxm" -> i]
,
{i, 1, 2}], {t, 0., 1., 1./n}],
_, #1[[1]] -> Association[#1[[2]] -> #2] &][[2]]
, Association
];

]


11.4845



The Table method from above:


x = {0.1, 0.2};
xm = {0.4, 0.5};
First@AbsoluteTiming[
{datax, dataxm} =

Transpose[
Table[{{{t, t}, x += t}, {{t, t}, xm += t}}, {t, 0., 1.,
1./n}], {3, 1, 4, 2}];
]


2.74062



Vectorized version:


x = {0.1, 0.2};

xm = {0.4, 0.5};
First@AbsoluteTiming[
tlist = Subdivide[0., 1., n];
slist = Accumulate[tlist];
datax2 = {
Transpose[{tlist, x[[1]] + slist}],
Transpose[{tlist, x[[2]] + slist}]
};
dataxm2 = {
Transpose[{tlist, xm[[1]] + slist}],

Transpose[{tlist, xm[[2]] + slist}]
};
]


0.061355



So, the latter is 44/187 time faster than the other methods. So you should take these considerations into account when using Reap and Sow.


Errors:


Max[Abs[data["datax"][1] - datax[[1]]]]

Max[Abs[data["datax"][2] - datax[[2]]]]
Max[Abs[data["dataxm"][1] - dataxm[[1]]]]
Max[Abs[data["dataxm"][2] - dataxm[[2]]]]
Max[Abs[datax - datax2]]
Max[Abs[dataxm - dataxm2]]


0.


0.


0.



0.


5.82077*10^-11


5.82077*10^-11



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...